Characterizing dissolved organic matter and evaluating associated nanofiltration membrane fouling

Chemosphere

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 495-502

  Her, Namguk ^a   Amy, Gary ^b   Chung, Jinwook ^c   Yoon, Jaekyung ^d   Yoon, Yeomin ^e  

^a Korea Army Academy at Young Cheon   (South Korea)

^b UNESCO IHE INSTITUTE FOR WATER EDUCATION   (Netherlands)

^c D Center   (South Korea)

^d Korea Institute of Energy Research (KIER)   (South Korea)

^e CH2M HILL Korea ^*  (South Korea)

Author keywords

Flux decline; Foulants; Nanofiltration; Natural organic matter; Rejection; Water treatment

Indexed keywords

FOULING; NANOFILTRATION; SIZE EXCLUSION CHROMATOGRAPHY; WATER QUALITY;

FLUX DECLINE; FOULANTS; NATURAL ORGANIC MATTER;

WATER TREATMENT;

DISSOLVED ORGANIC MATTER; GROUND WATER; ORGANIC CARBON;

FOULING; NANOFILTRATION; SIZE EXCLUSION CHROMATOGRAPHY; WATER QUALITY; WATER TREATMENT;

ADSORPTION; CHROMATOGRAPHY; DISSOLVED ORGANIC MATTER; FOULING; FRACTIONATION; FTIR SPECTROSCOPY; GROUNDWATER; MEMBRANE; NANOTECHNOLOGY; SAMPLING; WATER QUALITY; WATER TABLE; WATER TREATMENT;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; BIOFOULING; FRACTIONATION; GEL PERMEATION CHROMATOGRAPHY; HYDROPHILICITY; HYDROPHOBICITY; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NANOFILTRATION; WATER QUALITY; WATER TREATMENT;

EID: 36148995453     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.06.025     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Childress A., and Elimelech M. Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membrane Sci. 119 (1996) 253-268
2. Chin Y., Aiken G., and O'Loughlin E. Molecular weight, polydispersity, and spectroscopic properties of aquatic humic substances. Environ. Sci. Technol. 28 (1994) 1853-1858
3. Cho J., Amy G., Pellegrino J., and Yoon Y. Characterization of clean and natural organic matter (NOM) fouled NF and UF membranes, and foulants characterization. Desalination 118 (1998) 101-108
4. Cho J., Amy G., and Pellegrino J. Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: Initial comparison of rejection and flux decline characteristics with ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes. Water Res. 33 (1999) 2517-2526
5. Cho J., Amy G., and Pellegrino J. Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: factors and mechanisms affecting rejection and flux-decline with charged ultrafiltration (UF) membrane. J. Membrane Sci. 164 (2000) 89-110
6. Deshmukh S., and Childress A. Zeta potential of commercial RO membranes: Influence of source water type and chemistry. Desalination 140 (2001) 87-95
7. Gilron J., and Hasson D. Calcium sulfate fouling of RO membrane. Chem. Eng. Sci. 42 (1987) 2351-2360
8. Her N., Amy G., Foss D., Cho J., Yoon Y., and Kosenka P. Optimization of method for detecting and characterizing NOM by HPLC-size exclusion chromatography with UV and on-line DOC detection. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36 (2002) 1069-1076
9. Her N., Amy G., and Jarusutthirak C. Seasonal variation of nanofiltration (NF) foulants: Identification and control. Desalination 132 (2000) 143-160
10. Hong S., and Elimelech M. Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membrane Sci. 132 (1997) 159-181
11. Kaiya Y., Itoh Y., Takizawa S., Fujita K., and Tagawa T. Analysis of organic matter causing membrane fouling in drinking water treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 41 (2000) 59-67
12. 4 scale formation mechanism in various nanofiltration module. J. Membrane Sci. 163 (1999) 63-74
13. McKnight D., Boyer E., Westerhoff P., Doran P., Kulbe T., and Andersen D. Spectrofluorometric characterization of dissolved organic matter for indication of precursor organic material and aromaticity. Limnol. Oceanogr. 46 (2001) 38-48
14. Pervov A.G. Scale formation prognosis and cleaning procedure schedules in RO system operation. Desalination 83 (1991) 77-118
15. Septh T.F., Summers R.S., and Guesses A.M. Nanofiltration foulants from a treated surface water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32 (1998) 3612-3617
16. Stevenson F.J. Humus Chemistry: Genesis, Composition, Reactions. second ed. (1994), John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, USA
17. Tang C.Y., Kwon Y.N., and Leckie J.O. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by humic acid - effect of solution composition and hydrodynamic conditions. J. Membrane Sci. 290 (2007) 86-94
18. Wilbert M.C., Delagah S., and Pellegrino J. Variance of streaming potential measurements. J. Membrane Sci. 161 (1999) 247-261
19. Yoon Y., Amy G., Cho J., and Her N. Effects of retained natural organic matter (NOM) on NOM rejection and membrane flux with nanofiltration and ultrafiltration. Desalination 173 (2005) 209-221
20. -) rejection mechanisms by nanofiltration and ultrafiltration membranes. Sep. Sci. Technol. 39 (2004) 2105-2135
21. Yoon Y., and Lueptow R. Removal of organic contaminants by RO and NF membranes. J. Membrane Sci. 261 (2005) 76-86
22. Yoon Y., Westerhoff P., Snyder S., and Wert E. Nanofiltration and ultrafiltration of endocrine disrupting compounds, pharmaceuticals, and personal care products. J. Membrane Sci. 270 (2006) 88-100
23. -) removal. Water Res. 37 (2003) 2001-2012