SUBMARINES AND TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION: U.S. CONTINUATION PATENTING IN SOFTWARE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY TECHNOLOGIES IN THE 1980s AND 1990s

Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Growth

Volumn 15, Issue , 2004, Pages 71-101

  Graham, Stuart J H ^a   Mowery, David C ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36148991007     PISSN: 10484736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1048-4736(04)01503-6     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Aharonian, G. (2000). Worst software engineering patent of 1999. Patent News (January).
2. N. Argyres J. Porter Liebeskind Governance inseparability and the governance of U.S. biotechnology industry Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 47 2002 197 219
3. D. Audretsch The role of small firms in U.S. biotechnology clusters Small Business Economics 17 2001 3 15
4. J. Barton Adapting the intellectual property system to new technologies International Journal of Technology Management 2/3 1995 151 172
5. Glazier, S. (1997). Patent strategies for business . 3d. LBI Institute, Washington, DC.
6. Graham, S., Hall, B. H., Harhoff, D., & Mowery, D. C. (2002). Patent quality control: A comparison of U.S. patent re-examinations and European patent oppositions. In: W. Cohen & S. Merrill (Eds), Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy . Washington, DC: Board on Science, Technology and Economic Policy (STEP), The National Academies.
7. Graham, S., & Mowery, D. C. (2003). Intellectual property protection in the U.S. software industry. In: W. Cohen & S. Merrill (Eds), Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy . Washington, DC: Board on Science, Technology and Economic Policy (STEP), The National Academies.
8. Hall, B., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2000). Market value and patent citations: A first look. NBER Working Paper No. 7741.
9. Hall, B., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights, and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper No. 8498.
10. B. Hall R.H. Ziedonis The determinants of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1980–1994 Rand Journal of Economics 32 2001 101 128
11. Harhoff, D., & Reitzig, M. (2001). Determinants of opposition against EPO grants: The case of biotechnology and pharmaceuticals. Working Paper, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat, Munich.
12. Johnson, D. K. N., & Popp, D. (2001). Forced out of the closet: The impact of the American Inventors Protection Act of 1999 on the timing of patent disclosure. NBER Working Paper No. 8374.
13. Lanjouw, J., & Schankerman, M. (1997). Stylized facts of patent litigation: Value, scope and ownership. NBER Working Paper No. 6267 (December).
14. Lemley, M. (2001). Rational ignorance at the patent office. Northwestern University Law Review , 95 (4).
15. J. Lerner Patenting in the shadow of competitors Journal of Law and Economics 38 1995 463 495
16. Med Ad News (1998). Top 100 biotechnology companies. Engel Publishing Partners, 17 (July), 31–35.
17. Mowery, D. C. (1999). The computer software industry. In: D. C. Mowery & R. R. Nelson (Eds), The Sources of Industrial Leadership . New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. G.L. Priest B. Klein The selection of disputes for litigation Journal of Legal Studies 13 1984 1 55
19. Quillen, C., & Webster, O. (2001). Continuing patent applications and performance of the United States patent office. Federal Circuit Bar Journal (August).
20. M. Sharp The science of nations: European multinationals and American biotechnology Biotechnology 1 1999 132 162
21. Trajtenberg, M., Jaffe, A., & Henderson, R. (1997). University vs. corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Economics of Innovation and New Technology , 5 (1).
22. J. Wright Implications of recent patent law changes on biotechnology research and the biotechnology industry Virginia Journal of Law and Technology 1 1997 2 11