Coexistence of hydrogen-bonded loop and extended tetrapeptide conformations

Chemistry - A European Journal

Volumn 13, Issue 32, 2007, Pages 9004-9011

  Cervetto, Valentina ^a   Pfister, Rolf ^a   Kolano, Christoph ^a   Bregy, Harald ^a   Heimgartner, Heinz ^a   Helbing, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Conformation analysis; Hydrogen bonds; NMR spectroscopy; Peptides; Photoisomerization

Indexed keywords

CONFORMATIONS; HYDROGEN BONDS; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; ISOTOPES; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PHOTOISOMERIZATION;

CONFORMATION ANALYSIS; TETRATHIOPEPTIDES;

PEPTIDES;

OLIGOPEPTIDE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; HYDROGEN BOND; INFRARED SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; ISOMERISM; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYNTHESIS;

HYDROGEN BONDING; ISOMERISM; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; OLIGOPEPTIDES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY, INFRARED;

EID: 36148969752     PISSN: 09476539     EISSN: 15213765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200700396     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. P. Hamm, M. Lim, R. M. Hochstrasser. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 6123-6138.
2. M. Khalil, N. Demirdöven, A. Tokmakoff, J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 5258-5279.
3. S. Woutersen, P. Hamm, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2002, 14, R1035.
4. J. Bredenbeck, P. Hamm, J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 119, 1569-1578.
5. S. Woutersen, P. Hamm, J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 11316-11320.
6. M. T. Zanni, M. C. Asplund, R. M. Hochstrasser, J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 4579-4590.
7. S. Woutersen, R. Pfister, P. Hamm, Y. Mu. D. S. Kosov. G. Stock, J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 6833-6840.
8. J. Bredenbeck, J. Helbing, A. Sieg, T. Schrader, W. Zinth, C. Renner, R. Behrendt, L. Moroder, J. Wachtveitl. P. Hamm, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 6452.
9. M. Volk, Y. Kholodenko, H. S. M. Lu. E. A. Gooding, W. F. DeGrado, R. M. Hochstrasser, J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 8607-8616.
10. J. Bredenbeck, J. Helbing, J. R. Kumita, G. A. Woolley, P. Hamm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 2379-2384.
11. C. Kolano, J. Helbing, M. Kozinski, W. Sander, P. Hamm, Nature 2006, 444, 469-472.
12. J. Helbing, H. Bregy, J. Bredenbeck, R. Pfister, R. H. P. Hamm, J. Wachtveitl, L. D. Vico, M. Olivucci, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8823-8834.
13. H. Satzger, C. Root, P. Gilch, W. Zinth, D. Wildemann, G. Fischer, J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 4770-4775.
14. J. Zhao, J.-C. Micheau, C. Vargas, C. Schiene-Fischer, Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 6093-6101.
15. J. H. Miwa, A. K. Patel, N. Vivatrat, S. M. Popek, A. M. Meyer, Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3373-3375.
16. J. H. Miwa, L. Pallivathucal, S. Gowda, K. E. Lee, Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4655-4657.
17. O. E. Jensen, S. O. Lawesson, R. Bardi, A. M. Piazzesi, C. Toniolo, Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 5595-5606.
18. R. Bosch, G. Jung, W. Winter, Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1982, 1952, 1322-1329.
19. R. Nagaraj, P. Balaram, Acc. Chem. Res. 1981, 14, 356-362.
20. I. Thomsen, K. Clausen, S. Scheibye, S.-O. Lawesson, Org. Synth. 1984, 62, 158-162.
21. J. Lehmann, A. Linden, H. Heimgartner, Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 5359-5376.
22. S. Ham, M. Cho, J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 6915-6922.
23. H. Torii, T. Tatsumi, T. Kanazawa, M. Tasumi, J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 309-314.
24. The factor by which the perpendicular signal was scaled in order to suppress the amide I diagonal signals in the difference spectra (factor used: 2.75) is not suitable for the ester band (factor: 2.64). As a result, in the weighted difference between the 2D-IR spectra recorded with parallel and perpendicular polarization the diagonal peak of the ester band is still weakly present. This difference (and the deviation from the theoretical scaling factor of 3) is tentatively assigned to faster fluctuations in the orientation of the ester C=O mode, which leads to a partial anisotropy decay before the probe pulse arrives 1 ps after the pump pulse.
25. H. Kessler, Angew. Chem. 1982, 94, 509-520;
26. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1982, 21, 512-523.
27. Another reason for the differences between the two tetrapeptides. in addition to that between crystal and solution structures, may be the conformation of the peptide bond between the Boc protection group and the first amino acid, which can adopt both the Z and the E forms. Crystalline Boc-L-phenylalanine, for example, is found in the E form, while the Z form typical of a regular peptide bond seems to dominate in solution (refs. [31, 32]).
28. S. Ganesh, R. Jayakumar, J. Pept. Res. 2002, 59, 249-256.
29. S. Woutersen, Y. Mu, G. Stock, P. Hamm, Chem. Phys. 2001, 266. 137-147.
30. J. Bredenbeck, P. Hamm, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2003, 74, 3188-3189.
31. P. Hamm, R. A. Kaindl, J. Stenger, Opt. Lett. 2000, 25, 1798-1800.
32. E. Benedetti, B. Di Blasio, V. Pavone, C. Pedone, C. Toniolo, G. M. Bonora, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1980, 2, 217-224.
33. J. W. Bats, H. Fuess, H. Kessler, R. Schuck. Chem. Ber. 1980, 113, 520-530.