Faceted navigation and browsing features in new opacs: Robust support for scholarly information seeking?

Knowledge Organization

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 78-90

  La Barre, Kathryn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36148950510     PISSN: 09437444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5771/0943-7444-2007-2-78     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Anderson, James D. and Pérez-Carballo, José. 2005. Information retrieval design: principles and options for information description, organization, display, and access in information retrieval databases, digital libraries, catalogs, and indexes. East Brunswick, N.J.: Omecteca Institute.
2. Antelman, Kristin, Lynema, Emily, and Pace, Andrew K. 2006. Toward a 21st century library catalog. Information technology and libraries 25: 128-39.
3. Atherton, Pauline and Freeman, Robert R. 1967. File organization and search strategy using the Universal Decimal Classification in mechanized reference retrieval systems (AIP/UDC-5). New York: American Institute of Physics: UDC Project.
4. Bates, Marcia J., Wilde, Deborah N. and Siegfried, Susan. 1995. Research practices of humanities scholars in an online environment: The Getty online searching project report No. 3. Library and information science research 17(5): 40-58.
5. Bibliographic Services Task Force. 2005. Rethinking how we provide bibliographic services for the University of California. http://libraries.universityofcalifornia.edu/sopag/BSTF/Final.pdf (accessed 27 June 2007).
6. Binns, Jean, (undated, unpublished, manuscript). A faceted classification scheme: construction and operation. Held as part of the Cochrane papers at Syracuse University archives. (Notation indicates "Classification Research Study Group holdings").
7. Binns, Jean. 1961. Operating experience with a facet system in the English Electric Company. Unpublished manuscript held as part of the Cochrane papers at Syracuse University Archives.
8. rd ed. Whetstone: English Electric Company. Ltd.
9. Broughton, Vanda. 2001. Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organisation in a digital environment: The Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multidimensional knowledge structures. New review of hypermedia and multimedia 7: 67-102.
10. th International ISKO Conference, 10-13 July 2002, Granada, Spain. Würzburg: Ergon, pp. 135-42.
11. Broughton, Vanda. 2004. Faceted classification: a tool for subject access in the twenty first century. Signum 8: 5-18.
12. Broughton, Vanda and Lane, Heather. 2000. Classification schemes revisited: applications to Web indexing and searching. Journal of internet cataloging 2(3/4): 143-55.
13. Byrd, Jackie et al. 2006. A white paper on the future of cataloging at Indiana University. http://www.iub.edu/∼libtserv/pub/ Future_of_Cataloging_White_Paper.pdf (accessed 27 June 2007).
14. Calhoun, Karen. 2006. The changing nature of the catalog and its integration with other discovery tools. Prepared for the Library of Congress. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/calhoun-report-final.pdf (accessed 27 June 2007).
15. Carlisle, Kenneth Eugene. 1986. Analyzing jobs and tasks. Techniques in training and performance development series. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications, Inc.
16. Cochrane, Pauline. 1978. Books are for use. Final report of the Subject Access Project to the Council on Library Resources. ERIC Document 156131.
17. Cochrane, Pauline. 1981. Improving the quality of information retrieval - online to a library catalog or other access service ... or ... where do we go from here? Online 5(3): 30-41.
18. Collins, Maria, Samples, Jacquie, Pennell, Charley and Goldsmith, David. 2007. Magnifying the ILS with Endeca. Serials librarian 51 (3/4): 75-100.
19. Cutter, Charles Ammi. 1876. Rules for a printed dictionary catalogue. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
20. Dempsey, Lorcan. 2005. Making data work harder. Lorcan Dempsey's weblog on libraries, services and networks. http://orweblog.oclc.org/ archives/000535.html (accessed 27 June 2007).
21. Fast, Karl V. and Campbell, D. Grant. 2004. 'I still prefer Google': university student perceptions of searching OPACs and the Web. In Managing and enhancing information: cultures and conflicts, Proceedings of the 67th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Providence, Rhode Island, November 13-18, 2004. Medford, N.J.: Information Today, pp. 138-46.
22. Flanagan, John C. 1954. The critical incident technique. Psychological bulletin 51: 327-59.
23. Freeman, Robert R. and Atherton, Pauline. 1968a. AUDACIOUS: An experiment with online, interactive reference retrieval system using the Universal Decimal Classification as the index language in the field of nuclear Science. AIP.UDC-7. New York: American Institute of Physics, UDC Project.
24. Freeman, Robert R. and Atherton, P. 1968b. Final report of the research project for the evaluation of the UDC as the indexing language for a mechanized reference retrieval system. Springfield, VA: American Institute of Physics.
25. Freeman, Robert R. and Atherton, Pauline. 1969. Proceedings of a first seminar the UDC in a mechanized retrieval system. In: R. Moelgaard-Hansen and Rigby, Malcolm eds, Committee on Classification Research Seminar. FID/CR Report No. 9. Serie-No. 405. Copenhagen: Danish Center for Documentation.
26. Friedlander, Amy. 2002. Dimensions and use of the scholarly information environment: introduction to a data set. DLF/CLIR pub 110. http://www.clir. org/pubs/abstract/pub110abst.html (accessed 27 June 2007).
27. Hearst, Marti A. 2006. Clustering versus faceted categories for information exploration. Communications of the ACM 49(4): 59-61.
28. Hearst, Marti A., Elliott, Ame, English, Jennifer, Sinha, Rashimi, Swearingen, Kirsten, and Lee, Ka-Ping. 2002. Finding the flow in web site search: designing a search system and interface may best be served (and executed) by scrutinizing usability studies. Communications of the ACM, 45(9): 42-49.
29. Hearst, Marti A., Smalley, Preston and Chandler, Corey. 2006. Faceted metadata for information architecture and search. CHI 2006 course. http://bailando.sims.berkeley.edu/talks/chi_course06.pdf (accessed 27 June 2007).
30. Hildreth, Charles R. 1982. Online public access catalogs: the user interface. Dublin, OH: OCLC Online Computer Library Center.
31. Hildreth, Charles R. 1995. Online catalog design models: are we moving in the right direction? Washington, D.C.: Commissioned by the Council on Library Resources. http://myweb.cwpost.liu.edu/childret/clr-opac.html (accessed 27 June 2007).
32. Hockey, Susan, Broughton, Vanda and Slavic, Aida. 2004. Facet analytical theory in managing knowledge structures for the humanities. (FATKS). http://www.ucl.ac.uk/fatks/fat.htm (accessed 27 June 2007).
33. Horrigan, John B. and Rainie, Lee. 2002. Counting on the Internet. Washington, D.C.: Pew Internet & American Life Project. http://www. pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp? Report=80 (accessed 27 June 2007).
34. IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. 1998. Functional requirements for bibliographic records: final report. München: K.G. Saur. http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr.pdf (accessed 27 June 2007).
35. IFLA Working Group on Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records (FRANAR). 2007. Functional requirements for authority data: a conceptual model. Draft 2007-04-01. http://www.ifla.org/VII/d4/FRANAR-Conceptual_Model- 2ndReview.pdf (accessed 27 June 2007).
36. Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). 2006. http://www.jisc.ac.uk (accessed 27 June 2007).
37. Kuhlthau, Carol C. 2005. Towards collaboration between information seeking and information retrieval. Information research 10(2). http://informationr.net/ir/10-2/paper225.html (accessed 27 June 2007).
38. La Barre, Kathryn. 2006. The use of faceted analytico-synthetic theory as revealed in the practice of website construction and design. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.
39. Mann, Thomas. 2006a. A critical review [of] The changing nature of the catalog and its integration with other discovery tools. Final Report." March 17, 2006. Prepared for the Library of Congress by Karen Calhoun. http://www.guild2910.org/AFSCMECalhounReviewREV.pdf (accessed 27 June 2007).
40. Mann, Thomas. 2006b. What is going on at the Library of Congress? http://www.guild2910.org/AFSCMEWhatIsGoingOn.pdf (accessed 27 June 2007).
41. Mann, Thomas. 2007. The Peloponnesian war and the future of reference, cataloging, and scholarship in research libraries. http://guild2910.org/ Pelopponesian%20War%20June%2013% 202007.pdf (accessed 27 June 2007).
42. Marcum, Deanna B. 2005. The future of cataloging: address to the Ebsco Leadership Seminar, Boston, Massachusetts, January 16, 2005. http://www.loc.gov/library/reports/CatalogingSpeech.pdf (accessed 27 June 2007).
43. Meho, Lokman I. and Tibbo, Helen R. 2003. Modeling the information-seeking behavior of social scientists: Ellis's study revisited. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54: 570-87.
44. Miller, William and Pellen, Rita M. eds. 2006. Libraries and Google. Binghampton, N.Y: Haworth Press.
45. Murphy, Janet. 2003. Information-seeking habits of environmental scientists: A study of interdisciplinary scientists at the environmental protection agency in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. Issues in science & technology librarianship 38. http://www.istl.org/03-summer/ refereed.html (accessed 12 July 2007).
46. North Carolina State University. 2006. Endeca at the NCSU libraries. http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/endeca/ (accessed 27 June 2007).
47. Nelsonville Public Library. https://www.athenscounty.lib.oh.us/ (accessed 27 June 2007).
48. OCLC Online Computer Library Center. 2002. OCLC white paper on the information habits of college students. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. http://www5.oclc.org/downloads/community/informationhabits. pdf (accessed 27 June 2007).
49. Palmer, Carole L. 1996. Information work at the boundaries of science: linking library services to research practices: findings of a study of scientists at an interdisciplinary institute. Library trends 45(2): 165-91.
50. Palmer, Carole L. and Neumann, Laura. 2002. The information work of interdisciplinary humanities scholars: exploration and translation. Library quarterly 72: 85-117.
51. Pollitt, A. Steven. 1998. The essential role of dynamic faceted classification in improving access to online information. Proceedings of the 22nd International Online Information Meeting. New York: Learned Information, pp. 17-21.
52. Pollitt, A. Steven., Ellis, Geoffrey P., and Smith, Martin P. 1994. HIBROWSE for Bibliographic Databases. Journal of information science 20: 413-26.
53. Pollitt, A. Steven, Smith, Martin P., Braekevelt, Patrick A.J. and Treglown, Mark. 1996. HIGHBROWSE for EMBASE: The application of view-based searching techniques to Europe's most important biomedical database. In INFO 96 11th Annual Information Meeting, Tel Aviv, Israel May 5-9 1996. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
54. Queens Library Aquabrowser Library. http://aqua.queenslibrary.org/ (accessed 27 June 2007).
55. Ranganathan, S.R. 1962. Elements of library classification, based on lectures delivered at the University of Bombay in December 1944 and in the schools of librarianship in Great Britain in December 1956. Bombay: Asia Publishing House.
56. Richmond, Phyllis A. 1988. Precedent-setting contributions to modern classification. Journal of documentation 44: 242-49.
57. Research Information Network. 2006. Researchers and discovery services: Behaviour, perceptions and needs. http://www.rin.ac.uk/files/Report%20-%20final. pdf (accessed 27 June 2007).
58. Research Information Network (RIN). http://www.rin.ac.uk/ (accessed 27 June 2007).
59. Saracevic, Tefko. 1997. Users lost: reflections on the past, future, and limits of information science. SIGIR Forum 31(2): 16-27.
60. Sparks, Sue. 2005. JISC disciplinary differences report. London: Rightscom. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/ Disciplinary%20Differences%20and%20Needs.doc (accessed 27 June 2007).
61. Tenopir, Carol. 2003. User and users of electronic library resources: an overview and analysis of recent research studies. With the assistance of Brenda Hitchcock and Ashley Pillow. CLIR pub. 120.
62. Washington, D.C.: Council on Library and Information Resources. http://www.clir.org/PUBS/reports/pub120/pub120.pdf (accessed 27 June 2007).
63. Unsworth, John. 2000. Scholarly primitives: what methods do humanities researchers have in common, and how might our tools reflect this?" In Symposium on Humanities Computing: Formal Methods, Experimental Practice, King's College, London, 13 May 2000. http://www.iath.virginia.edu/∼jmu2m/ Kings.5-00/primitives.html (accessed 27 June 2007).
64. Vickery, B. C. 1966. Faceted classification schemes. Rutgers series on systems for the intellectual organization of information v. 5. New Brunswick, NJ: Graduate School of Library Service, Rutgers, the State University.
65. Wilson, T.D. 2000. Human information behavior. Informing science, 3 (2): 49-55. http://inform.nu/Articles/Vol3/v3n2p49-56.pdf (accessed 27 June 2007).