Towards collaboration between information seeking and information retrieval

Information Research

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2005, Pages

  Kuhlthau, Carol C ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 14744303429     PISSN: 13681613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Bates, M. (1989). The design of browsing and berry picking techniques for the online search interface. Online Review, 13(5), 407-423.
2. Bystrom, K. (2000). The effects of task complexity on the relationship between information types acquired and information sources used. The New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 1, 85-102.
3. Bystrom, K. & Jarvelin, K. (1995). Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Information Processing and Management, 31(2), 191-213.
4. Choo, C. & Auster, E. (1993). Environmental scanning: acquisition and use of information by managers. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 28, 279-314.
5. Dervin, B. (1983). An overview of sensemaking research: concepts, methods and results to date. Paper presented at the International Communications Association Annual Meeting. Dallas, Texas.
6. Dervin, B. (1999). On studying information seeking methodologically: the implications of connecting metatheory to method. Information Processing and Management, 35(6), 727-750.
7. Ellis, D. (1989). A behavioural approach to information retrieval system design. Journal of Documentation, 48(3), 171-212.
8. Ellis, D., Allen, D., & Wilson, T.D. (1999). Information science and information systems: conjunct subjects, disjunct disciplines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1095-1107.
9. Erdelez, S. (1997). Information encountering: a conceptual framework for accidental information discovery. In P. Vakkari, R. Savolainen & B. Dervin (Eds.), Information seeking in context: proceedings of an international conference on research in information needs, seeking and use in different contexts. Tampere, Finland: 14-16 August 1996 (pp. 412-421). London: Taylor Graham.
10. Fisher, K., Durrance, J., & Hinton, M. (2004). Information grounds and the use of need-based services by immigrants in Queens, New York: a context-based, outcome evaluation approach. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(8), 754-766.
11. Heinstrom, J. (2002). Fast surfers, broad scanners and deep divers: personality and information-seeking behavior. Åbo (Turku), Finland: Åbo Akademi University Press.
12. Ingwersen, P. & Jarvelin, K. (forthcoming). The turn: integration of information seeking and retrieval in context. Berlin: Springer/Kluwer.
13. Kuhlthau, C. (1991). Inside the Information Search Process: information seeking from the user's perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 361-371.
14. Kuhlthau, C. (2004) Seeking meaning: a process approach to library and information services. 2nd edition. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
15. Limberg, L. (1997). Information use for learning purposes. In P. Vakkari, R. Savolainen & B. Dervin (Eds.) Information seeking in context: proceedings of an international conference on research in information needs, seeking and use in different contexts. Tampere, Finland: 14-16 August 1996 (pp. 275-289). London: Taylor Graham.
16. Rice, R. E., McCreadie, M., & Chang, S. L. (2001). Accessing and browsing information and communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Saracevic, T. (1975). Relevance: a review of and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 26(6), 321-343.
18. Saracevic, T. (1996) Relevance reconsidered. In P. Ingwersen & N. O. Pors (Eds.) Colibrary and information science 2: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science: Integration in Perspective (pp. 201-218). Copenhagen: Royal School of Librarianship.
19. Savolainen, R. (1995). Everyday life information seeking approaching information seeking in the context of 'way of life'. Library and Information Science Research, 17(3), 259-294.
20. Taylor, R. (1991). Information use environments. Progress in Communication Sciences, 10, 217-255.
21. Todd, R. J. (1997). Information utilisation: a cognitive analysis of how girls utilize drug information based on Brookes' fundamental equation [K[S] + Δ I = K[S + Δ S]. In P. Vakkari, R. Savolainen & B. Dervin (Eds.), Information seeking in context: proceedings of an international conference on research in information needs, seeking and use in different contexts. Tampere, Finland: 14-16 August 1996 (pp. 351-370). London: Taylor Graham.
22. Vakkari, P. (2001). A theory of the task-based information retrieval process: a summary and generalization of a longitudinal study. Journal of Documentation, 57(1), 44-60.
23. Vakkari, P. (2003). Task-based information searching. Annual review of information science and technology, 37, 413-464.
24. Wilson, T.D. (1999). Models in information behaviour research. Journal of Documentation, 55(3), 249-133.