Performance and application criteria of two fast formulations for flexible multibody dynamics

Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 381-404

  Lugris U ^a   Naya, M A ^a   Gonzalez F ^a   Cuadrado, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF A CORUÑA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Absolute and relative coordinates; Efficiency; Flexible multibody dynamics

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; RIGIDITY; TOPOLOGY; VEHICLE SUSPENSIONS;

FLEXIBLE MULTIBODY DYNAMICS; GLOBAL FORMULATION; RELATIVE COORDINATES;

FLEXIBLE STRUCTURES;

EID: 36049023419     PISSN: 15397734     EISSN: 15397742     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15397730701617947     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Bae, D., Haug, E. (1987). A recursive formulation for constrained mechanical system dynamics: Part I. Open loop systems. Mechanics of Structures and Machines 15(3):359-382.
2. Craig, R., Bampton, M. (1968). Coupling of substructures for dynamic analyses. AIAA Journal 6(7):1313-1319.
3. Cuadrado, J., Cardenal, J., Bayo, E. (1997). Modeling and solution methods for efficient real-time simulation of multibody dynamics. Multibody System Dynamics 1(3):259-280.
4. Cuadrado, J., Cardenal, J., Morer, P., Bayo, E. (2000). Intelligent simulation of multibody dynamics: space-state and descriptor methods in sequential and parallel computing environments. Multibody System Dynamics 4(1):55-73.
5. Cuadrado, J., Gutiérrez, R., Naya, M., Morer, P. (2001). A comparison in terms of accuracy and efficiency between a MBS dynamic formulation with stress analysis and a non-linear FEA code. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 51(9):1033-1052.
6. Cuadrado, J., Dopico, D., González, M., Naya, M. (2004). A combined penalty and recursive real-time formulation for multibody dynamics. Journal of Mechanical Design 126(4):602-608.
7. Frik, S., Leister, G., Schwartz, W. (1993). Simulation of the IAVSD road vehicle benchmark bombardier iltis with FASIM, MEDYNA, NEWEUL, and SIMPACK. In: Multibody Computer Codes in Vehicle System Dynamics. Korthüm, N., Sharp, R. S., eds. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.
8. Funes, F., Jalón, J., García de, Ribera, F., de Alvarez, E. (2004). Solución de la dinámica de sistemas flexibles mediante formulaciones topológicas, In: Métodos Computacionais em Engenharia, AMPTAC, Lisbon, Portugal.
9. Géradin, M., Cardona, A. (2001). Flexible Multibody Dynamics: A Finite Element Approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
10. Newmark, N. (1959). A method of computation for structural dynamics. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE 85(EM3):67-94.
11. Schwertassek, R., Wallrapp, O., Shabana, A. (1999). Felxible multibody simulation and choice of shape functions. Nonlinear Dynamics 20(4):361-380.
12. Shabana, A. (2005). Dynamics of Multibody Systems, 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press.