Regulating translation of maternal messages: multiple repression mechanisms

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 547-554

  Vardy, Leah ^a,b   Orr Weaver, Terry L ^a,c  

^a WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

^b GENOME INSTITUTE OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYCLIN B; MESSENGER RNA;

CELL CYCLE; DROSOPHILA; EMBRYO CELL; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; MEIOSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGENY; PROTEIN BINDING; REVIEW; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BODY PATTERNING; CYCLIN B; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA PROTEINS; EUKARYOTIC INITIATION FACTOR-4E; EUKARYOTIC INITIATION FACTORS; EXORIBONUCLEASES; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; HUMANS; MEIOSIS; PROTEIN BIOSYNTHESIS; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; RNA CAPS; RNA, MESSENGER; RNA-BINDING PROTEINS;

EID: 36049009977     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2007.09.002     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Zaessinger S., et al. Oskar allows nanos mRNA translation in Drosophila embryos by preventing its deadenylation by Smaug/CCR4. Development 133 (2006) 4573-4583
2. Cho P.F., et al. A new paradigm for translational control: inhibition via 5′-3′ mRNA tethering by Bicoid and the eIF4E cognate 4EHP. Cell 121 (2005) 411-423
3. Tadros W., and Lipshitz H.D. Setting the stage for development: mRNA translation and stability during oocyte maturation and egg activation in Drosophila. Dev. Dyn. 232 (2005) 593-608
4. Potireddy S., et al. Analysis of polysomal mRNA populations of mouse oocytes and zygotes: dynamic changes in maternal mRNA utilization and function. Dev. Biol. 298 (2006) 155-166
5. Tadros W., et al. SMAUG is a major regulator of maternal mRNA destabilization in Drosophila and its translation is activated by the PAN GU kinase. Dev. Cell 12 (2007) 143-155
6. de Moor C.H., et al. Mechanisms of translational control by the 3′ UTR in development and differentiation. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 16 (2005) 49-58
7. Kozak M. Rethinking some mechanisms invoked to explain translational regulation in eukaryotes. Gene 382 (2006) 1-11
8. Piccioni F., et al. Translational regulation during oogenesis and early development: the cap-poly(A) tail relationship. C. R. Biol. 328 (2005) 863-881
9. Gingras A.C., et al. Regulation of translation initiation by FRAP/mTOR. Genes Dev. 15 (2001) 807-826
10. Richter J.D., and Sonenberg N. Regulation of cap-dependent translation by eIF4E inhibitory proteins. Nature 433 (2005) 477-480
11. Stebbins-Boaz B., et al. Maskin is a CPEB-associated factor that transiently interacts with elF-4E. Mol. Cell 4 (1999) 1017-1027
12. Nakamura A., et al. Drosophila cup is an eIF4E binding protein that associates with Bruno and regulates oskar mRNA translation in oogenesis. Dev. Cell 6 (2004) 69-78
13. Nelson M.R., et al. Drosophila Cup is an eIF4E-binding protein that functions in Smaug-mediated translational repression. EMBO J. 23 (2004) 150-159
14. Sugimura I., and Lilly M.A. Bruno inhibits the expression of mitotic cyclins during the prophase I meiotic arrest of Drosophila oocytes. Dev. Cell 10 (2006) 127-135
15. Rom E., et al. Cloning and characterization of 4EHP, a novel mammalian eIF4E-related cap-binding protein. J. Biol. Chem. 273 (1998) 13104-13109
16. Cho P.F., et al. Cap-dependent translational inhibition establishes two opposing morphogen gradients in Drosophila embryos. Curr. Biol. 16 (2006) 2035-2041
17. Dubnau J., and Struhl G. RNA recognition and translational regulation by a homeodomain protein. Nature 379 (1996) 694-699
18. Niessing D., et al. Bicoid associates with the 5′-cap-bound complex of caudal mRNA and represses translation. Genes Dev. 16 (2002) 2576-2582
19. Chagnovich D., and Lehmann R. Poly(A)-independent regulation of maternal hunchback translation in the Drosophila embryo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98 (2001) 11359-11364
20. Wreden C., et al. Nanos and pumilio establish embryonic polarity in Drosophila by promoting posterior deadenylation of hunchback mRNA. Development 124 (1997) 3015-3023
21. Macdonald P.M. Translational repression by Bicoid: competition for the cap. Cell 121 (2005) 321-322
22. Benoit B., et al. An essential cytoplasmic function for the nuclear poly(A) binding protein, PABP2, in poly(A) tail length control and early development in Drosophila. Dev. Cell 9 (2005) 511-522
23. Kadyrova L.Y., et al. Translational control of maternal Cyclin B mRNA by Nanos in the Drosophila germline. Development 134 (2007) 1519-1527
24. Vardy L., and Orr-Weaver T.L. The Drosophila PNG kinase complex regulates the translation of cyclin B. Dev. Cell 12 (2007) 157-166
25. Kim-Ha J., et al. oskar mRNA is localized to the posterior pole of the Drosophila oocyte. Cell 66 (1991) 23-35
26. Ephrussi A., et al. Oskar organizes the germ plasm and directs localization of the posterior determinant nanos. Cell 66 (1991) 37-50
27. Asaoka-Taguchi M., et al. Maternal Pumilio acts together with Nanos in germline development in Drosophila embryos. Nat. Cell Biol. 1 (1999) 431-437
28. Wickens M., et al. A PUF family portrait: 3′UTR regulation as a way of life. Trends Genet. 18 (2002) 150-157
29. Sonoda J., and Wharton R.P. Drosophila Brain Tumor is a translational repressor. Genes Dev. 15 (2001) 762-773
30. Wang C., and Lehmann R. Nanos is the localized posterior determinant in Drosophila. Cell 66 (1991) 637-647
31. Murata Y., and Wharton R.P. Binding of pumilio to maternal hunchback mRNA is required for posterior patterning in Drosophila embryos. Cell 80 (1995) 747-756
32. Goldstrohm A.C., et al. PUF protein-mediated deadenylation is catalyzed by Ccr4p. J. Biol. Chem. 282 (2007) 109-114
33. Goldstrohm A.C., et al. PUF proteins bind Pop2p to regulate messenger RNAs. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13 (2006) 533-539
34. Hake L.E., and Richter J.D. CPEB is a specificity factor that mediates cytoplasmic polyadenylation during Xenopus oocyte maturation. Cell 79 (1994) 617-627
35. Fenger D.D., et al. PAN GU: a protein kinase that inhibits S phase and promotes mitosis in early Drosophila development. Development 127 (2000) 4763-4774
36. Huang J., and Raff J.W. The disappearance of cyclin B at the end of mitosis is regulated spatially in Drosophila cells. EMBO J. 18 (1999) 2184-2195
37. Kuersten S., and Goodwin E.B. The power of the 3′ UTR: translational control and development. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4 (2003) 626-637
38. Lehmann R., and Nusslein-Volhard C. Abdominal segmentation, pole cell formation, and embryonic polarity require the localized activity of oskar, a maternal gene in Drosophila. Cell 47 (1986) 141-152
39. Ephrussi A., and Lehmann R. Induction of germ cell formation by oskar. Nature 358 (1992) 387-392
40. Chekulaeva M., et al. Bruno acts as a dual repressor of oskar translation, promoting mRNA oligomerization and formation of silencing particles. Cell 124 (2006) 521-533
41. Castagnetti S., et al. Control of oskar mRNA translation by Bruno in a novel cell-free system from Drosophila ovaries. Development 127 (2000) 1063-1068
42. Pillai R.S., et al. Repression of protein synthesis by miRNAs: how many mechanisms?. Trends Cell Biol. 17 (2007) 118-126
43. Johnstone O., and Lasko P. Translational regulation and RNA localization in Drosophila oocytes and embryos. Annu. Rev. Genet. 35 (2001) 365-406
44. Preiss T., and Hentze M.W. From factors to mechanisms: translation and translational control in eukaryotes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9 (1999) 515-521
45. Mendez R., et al. Differential mRNA translation and meiotic progression require Cdc2-mediated CPEB destruction. EMBO J. 21 (2002) 1833-1844