Reattachment of the tuberosities with cable wires and bone graft in hemiarthroplasties done for proximal humeral fractures with cable wire and bone graft: 58 Patients with a 22-month minimum follow-up

Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

Volumn 21, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 682-686

  Krause, Fabian G ^a,d   Huebschle, Lars ^b   Hertel, Ralph ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b Sykehuset Buskerud HF ^*  (Norway)

^c Lindenhofspital Berne   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Fixation technique; Hemiarthroplasty; Proximal humerus fracture; Tuberosity

Indexed keywords

SUTURE MATERIAL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY; BONE GRAFT; BONE STRENGTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE FIXATION; FRACTURE HEALING; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; HUMERUS FRACTURE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT; OSTEOLYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; RANGE OF MOTION; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SHOULDER RADIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT FAILURE; WIRE FIXATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; BONE WIRES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SHOULDER FRACTURES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 35948988478     PISSN: 08905339     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31815917e0     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Ballmer FT, Hertel R. Indikation und Resultate der Schulterprothetik bei komplexen proximalen Humerusfrakturen. Ther Umschau. 1998;55:197-202.
2. Bosch U, Fremerey RW, Skutek M, et al. Die Hemiarthroplastik - Primäroder Sekundärmassnahme für 3- und 4-Fragment-Frakturen des proximalen Humerus beim älteren Menschen. Unfallchirurg. 1996;99:656-664.
3. Goldmann RT, Koval KJ, Cuomo F, et al. Functional outcome after humeral head replacement for acute three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995;4:81-86.
4. Hawkins RJ, Switlyk P. Acute prosthetic replacement for severe fractures of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1993;289:156-160.
5. Neer CS. Displaced proximal humeral fractures, II: treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52:1090-1103.
6. Tanner MW, Cofield RH. Prosthetic arthroplasty for fractures and fracture-dislocation of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1983;179:116-130.
7. Cofield RH. Comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1988;230:49-57.
8. Compito CA, Edward B, Bigliani LU. Arthroplasty and acute shoulder trauma. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1994;307:22-36.
9. Norris TR, Green A, McGuigan FX. Late prosthetic shoulder arthroplasty for displaced proximal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995;4:271-280.
10. Wirth MA, Rockwood CA. Complications of shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1994;307:47-69.
11. Constant CR, Murley AHG. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1987;214:160-164.
12. Hempfing A, Leunig M, Ballmer FT, et al. Surgical landmarks to determine humeral head retrotorsion for hemiarthroplasty in fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001;10:460-463.
13. Dines DM, Warren RF. Modular shoulder hemiarthroplasty for acute fractures. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1994;307:18-26.
14. Levine WN, Connor PM, Yamaguchi K, et al. Humeral head replacement for proximal humeral fractures. Orthopedics. 1998;21:68-73.
15. Neer CS. Fractures. In: Shoulder Reconstruction. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co; 1990:363-420.
16. Reuther F, Müller S, Wahl D. Management of humeral head fractures with a trauma shoulder prosthesis: correlation between joint function and healing of the tuberosities. Acta Orthop Belg. 2007;73:179-187.
17. Kwon YW, Zuckerman JD. Outcome after treatment of proximal humeral fractures with humeral head replacement. Instr Course Lect. 2005;54:363-369.
18. Boileau P, Walch G. Shoulder arthroplasty in acute fractures of the proximal humerus: problems and solutions. In: Walch G, Boileau P, eds. Shoulder Arthroplasty. New York: Springer; 1999:297-314.
19. Habermeyer P, Ebert T. Aktueller Entwicklungsstand und Perspektiven der Schulterendoprothetik. Unfallchirurg. 1999;102:668-683.
20. Bigliani LU, Flatow EL, McCluskey GM, et al. Failed prosthetic replacement for displaced proximal humerus fractures. Orthop Trans 1991;15:747-748.
21. Boilieu P, Trojani C, Walch G, et al. Shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of sequelae of fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001;10:299-308.
22. Frankle MA, Mighell MA. Techniques and principles of tuberosity fixation for proximal humeral fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13:239-247.
23. Mark AF, Greenwald DP, Markee BA, et al. Biomechanical effects of malposition of tuberosity fragments on the humeral prosthetic reconstruction for four-part proximal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001;10:321-326.
24. Demirhan M, Kilicoglu O, Altinel L, et al. Prognostic factors in prosthetic replacement for acute proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17:181-188.
25. Boileau P, Krishnan GS, Tinsi L, et al. Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:401-412.
26. Schatzmann L, Hertel R, Beutler T, et al. In vitro stability of three muscles, fixation of the tuberosity and hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures. In: Proceedings of the 14th Congress of the European Society of the Shoulder and Elbow; Lisbon, Portugal; September 20-23, 2000.