Techniques and principles of tuberosity fixation for proximal humeral fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 239-247

  Frankle, Mark A ^a,b   Mighell, Mark A ^a  

^a FLORIDA ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPLASTY; BONE SCREW; CADAVER; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORTICAL BONE; EXTERNAL FIXATOR; FRACTURE REDUCTION; HUMAN; HUMERUS FRACTURE; HUMERUS HEAD; JOINT STABILITY; JOINT STIFFNESS; MOBILIZATION; MUSCLE ATROPHY; OSTEOSYNTHESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; BIOMECHANICS; HUMANS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SHOULDER FRACTURES;

EID: 1442358052     PISSN: 10582746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1058-2746(02)00041-1     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. Bhushan B, Gupta BF. Handbook of tribiology - materials, coatings, and surface treatments. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1991
2. Eide, A, et al. Engineering fundamentals and problem solving. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1979
3. Aufranc O, Jones W, Turner. Comminuted fracture-dislocation of the proximal humerus. JAMA 1966;195:150-8
4. Ballmer F.T., Hertel R. Indications and results of shoulder prosthetics in complex humerus fractures. Ther Umsch. 55:1998;197-202. in German.
5. Bigliani L., McCluskey G. Prosthetic replacement in acute fracture of the proximal humerus. Semin Arthroplasty. 1:1990;129-137.
6. Boileau P, Romeo A, LeHeuc J. et al A prospective multicenter outcome study of shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. Paper 038. Presented at: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 67th Annual Meeting; March 19, 2000; Orlando, Fla
7. Boileau P., Tagligaris-Cordero B., Payeur F., Argenson C. Prognostic factors during rehabilitation after shoulder arthroplasty prosthesis for fracture. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 85:1999;106-115. in French.
8. Boileau P., Walch G., Krishnan S. Three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus. Implications for surgical technique and prosthetic design. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 79:1997;857-865.
9. Boileau P., Walch G., Krishnan S. Tuberosity osteosynthesis and hemiarthroplasty for four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1:2000;96-109.
10. Bosch U., Skutek M., Fremerey R., Tscherne H. Outcomes after primary and secondary hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 7:1998;479-484.
11. Cofield R.H. Comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop. 230:1988;49-57.
12. Compito C.A., Self E.B., Bigliani L.U. Arthroplasty and acute shoulder trauma. Reasons for success and failure. Clin Orthop. 307:1994;27-36.
13. Conner P.M., D'Alessandro D.F. Role of hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures. J South Orthop Assoc. 4:1995;9-22.
14. Coumo F, Loebenberg M, Zuckerman J. The effect of greater tuberosity placement on active range of motion after hemiarthroplasty for acute fractures of the proximal humerus. Paper 28. Presented at: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons 16th Annual Open Meeting Proceedings; March 15-19, 2000; Orlando, Fla
15. Darder A., Darder A. Jr, Sanchis V., Gastaldi E., Gomar F. Four-part displaced proximal humerus fractures operative treatment using Kirschner wires and a tension band. J Orthop Trauma. 7:1993;497-505.
16. Depuy surgical techniques guide. Global fracture system
17. Dimakopoulos P., Potamitis N., Lambiris E. Hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of comminuted intraarticular fractures of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop. 341:1997;7-11.
18. Encore surgical technique guide. Encore fracture system
19. Fischer RA, Nicholson GP, McIlveen SJ, et al. Primary humeral head replacement for severely displaced proximal humerus fractures. Paper presented at: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 59th Annual Meeting; February 1992; Washington, DC
20. Frankle MA, Markee B, Greenwald D. The biomechanical effects of malpositioned tuberosity fractures on the humeral prosthetic reconstruction for four-part proximal humerus. Paper 359. Presented at: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 65th Annual Meeting; 1998; New Orleans, La
21. Frankle M.A., Greenwald D.P., Markee B., Ondrovic L.E., Lee W.E. III. Biomechanical effects of malposition of tuberosity fragments on the humeral prosthetic reconstruction for four-part proximal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 10:2001;321-326.
22. Gallinaro P., Crova M., Calderale P.M. Biomechanical failure in osteosynthesis. Ital J Orthop Traumatol. 3:1977;321-332.
23. Gobel F., Wuthe T., Reichel H. Results of shoulder hemiarthroplasty in patients with acute and old fractures of the proximal humerus. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 137:1999;25-30. in German.
24. Goldman R.T., Koval K.J., Cuomo F., Gallagher M.A., Zuckerman J.D. Functional outcome after humeral head replacement for acute three and four-part proximal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 4:1995;81-86.
25. Hartsock L.A., Estes W.J., Murray C.A., Friedman R.J. Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 29:1998;467-475.
26. Hawkins R.J., Switlyk P. Acute prosthetic preplacement for severe fractures of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop. 289:1993;156-160.
27. Iannotti J.P., Gabriel J.P., Schneck S.L., Evans B.G., Misra S. The normal glenohumeral relationships an anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 74:1992;491-500.
28. Iannotti J.P., Williams G.R. Total shoulder arthroplasty. Factors influencing prosthetic design. Orthop Clin North Am. 29:1998;377-391.
29. Jensen G.F., Christiansen C., Boesen J., Hegedos V., Transbol I. Relationship between bone mineral content and frequency of postmenopausal fractures. Acta Med Scand. 213:1983;61-63.
30. Ko J.Y., Yamamoto R. Surgical treatment of complex fracture of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop. 327:1996;225-237.
31. Koval K.J., Blair B., Takei R., Kummer F.J., Zuckerman J.D. Surgical neck fractures of the proximal humerus a laboratory evaluation of ten fixation techniques. J Trauma. 40:1996;778-783.
32. Kraulis J., Hunter G. The results of prosthetic replacement in fracture-dislocations of the upper end of the humerus. Injury. 8:1976;129-131.
33. Laval-Geantet A.M., Bergot C., Carroll R., Garcia-Schaefer F. Cortical bone senescence and mineral bone density of the humerus. Calcif Tissue Int. 35:1983;68-272.
34. Levy A, Bono C, Renard R. et al Greater tuberosity fractures of the humerus: a biomedical malunion model delineating the effects of preplacement on mechanics. Paper 283. Presented at: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 66th Annual Meeting; 1999; Anaheim, Calif
35. Lim T.E., Ochsner P.E., Marti R.K., Holscher A.A. The results of treatment of comminuted fractures and fracture-dislocations of the proximal humerus. Neth J Surg. 35:1983;139-143.
36. Marotte J.H., Lord G., Bancel P. Neer arthroplasty in complex fractures and fracture-dislocations of the shoulder, 12 cases. Chirurgie. 104:1978;816-821. in French.
37. Mast J., Jakob R., Ganz R. Planning and reduction techniques in fracture surgery. 1989;Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
38. Mighell M, Collinge C, Frankle M. Outcomes of hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal humerus. Paper 15. Presented at: AAOS Specialty Day, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons 2nd Biennial Proceedings; May 4-7, 2000; Miami, Fla. p. 119
39. Mills H.J., Horne G. Fracture of the proximal humerus in adults. J Trauma. 25:1985;801-805.
40. Moeckel B.H., Dines D.M., Warren R.F., Altchek D.W. Modular hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 74:1992;884-889.
41. Moskal M, Campbell B, Smith K, Matsen FA. Radiographic analysis of 122 failed shoulder arthroplasties. Paper 137. Presented at: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 66th Annual Proceedings; 1999; Anaheim, Calif
42. Mueller M.E., Allogower M., Schneider R., Willenegger H. Manual of internal fixation. 2nd edition:1979;Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
43. Naidu S.H., Bixler B., Capo J.T., Moulton M.J., Radin A. Percutaneous pinning of proximal humerus fractures a biomedical study. Orthopedics. 20:1997;1073-1076.
44. Neer C.S. II. Displaced proximal humerus fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 52:1970;1077-1089.
45. Neer C.S. II. Displaced proximal humerus fractures. II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 52:1970;1090-1103.
46. Neumann K., Muhr G., Breitfuss H. Primary humerus head replacement in dislocated proximal humeral fracture. Indications, techniques, results. Orthopade. 21:1992;140-147. in German.
47. Nicholson G., Fischer S., McIlveen J., et al. Proximal humeral head replacement for severely displaced proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2:1993;S12.
48. Paavolainen J., Djorkenheim J. Fractures of the proximal humerus involving the intertubercular groove. Acta Radiol. 30:1989;4.
49. Palmer S.H., Bishay M., Ross A.C. Displaced fractures of the proximal humerus a case report which highlights the difference in the outcome using two orthodox methods of treatment. Injury. 26:1995;702-704.
50. Pearl M.L., Volk A.G. Retroversion of the proximal humerus in relationship to prosthetic replacement arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 4:1995;286-289.
51. Perren S.M., Rahn B.A. Biomechanics of fracture healing. Can J Surg. 23:1980;228-232.
52. Ruch D.S., Gillisson R.R., Marr A.W., Russell G.B., Nunley J.A. Fixation of three-part proximal humeral fractures a biomechanical evaluation. J Orthop Trauma. 14:2000;36-40.
53. Shaw J.A., Daubert H.B. Compression capability of cerclage fixation systems a biomechanical study. Orthopedics. 11:1988;1169-1174.
54. Skutek M., Frenmerey R.W., Bosch U. Level of physical activity in elderly patients after hemiarthroplasty for three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 117:1988;252-255.
55. Stableforth P.G. Four-part fractures of the neck of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 66:1984;104-108.
56. Szyszkowitz R., Seggl W., Schleifer P., Cundy P.F. Proximal humerus fractures. Management techniques and expected results. Clin Orthop. 292:1993;13-25.
57. Tanner M.W., Cofield R.H. Prosthetic arthroplasty for fractures and fracture-dislocations of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop. 179:1983;116-128.
58. Tencer A.F., Johnson K.D., Kyle R.F., Fu F.H. Biomechanics of fracture and fracture fixation. Instr Course Lect. 42:1993;19-55.
59. Tillet E., Smith M., Fulcher M. Anatomic determination of humeral head retroversion the relationship of the central axis of the humeral head to the bicep groove. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2:1993;255-256.
60. Van Mao C., Hayes W.C. Basic orthopaedic biomechanics. 1997;Raven Press, New York.
61. Weaver J., Chalmers J. Cancellous bone its strength and changes with aging and an evaluation of some methods of measuring its mineral content. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 48:1966;289-298.
62. Wheeler D., Colpille M. Biomechanical comparison of intramedullary and percutaneous pin fixation for proximal humerus fracture fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 11:1994;363-367.
63. Willems W., Lim T. Neer arthroplasty for humeral fracture. Acta Orthop Scand. 56:1984;394-395.
64. Willems G.R. Jr, Copley L.A., Iannotti J.P., Lisser S.P. The influence of intramedullary fixation on figure-of-eight wiring for surgical neck fractures of the proximal humerus a biomechanical comparison. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 6:1997;423-428.
65. Wretenberg P., Ekelund A. Acute hemiarthroplasty after proximal humerus fractures in old patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 68:1997;121-123.
66. Zukerman J., Cuomo F., Koval K. Proximal humeral replacement for complex fractures indications and surgical technique. Instr Course Lect. 46:1997;7-14.
67. Zyto K., Wallace W.A., Frostick S.P., Preston B.J. Outcome after hemiarthroplasty for three and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 7:1998;85-89.