Acceleration response modification factors for nonstructural components attached to inelastic moment-resisting frame structures

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 36, Issue 14, 2007, Pages 2189-2210

  Sankaranarayanan, Ragunath ^a   Medina, Ricardo A ^b  

^a AREVA NP INC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Acceleration response modification factor; Floor acceleration demands; Floor response spectra; Moment resisting frames; Nonstructural components; Seismic design

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; AMPLIFICATION; DAMPING; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL FRAMES;

FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRUM; NONSTRUCTURAL COMPONENTS; PEAK COMPONENT ACCELERATION;

SEISMIC DESIGN;

DAMPING; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; GROUND MOTION; PEAK ACCELERATION; SEISMIC DESIGN; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 35948954435     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.724     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. McKevitt WE, Timler PAM, Lo KK. Nonstructural damage from the Northridge Earthquake. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 1995; 22(2):428-437.
2. Myrtle RC, Masri SE, Nigbor RL, Caffrey JP. Classification and prioritization of essential systems in hospitals under extreme events. Earthquake Spectra 2005; 21(3):779-802.
3. Filiatrault A, Christopoulos C, Stearns C. Guidelines, specifications, and seismic performance characterization of nonstructural building components and equipment. PEER 2002/05, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA, 2002.
4. Taghavi S, Miranda E. Probabilistic study of peak floor acceleration demands in linear structures. Ninth International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, San Francisco, CA, 2003; 1565-1572.
5. Naeim F. Learning from structural and nonstructural seismic performance of 20 extensively instrumented buildings. Twelfth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, 2000.
6. Scholl RE. Nonstructural issues of seismic design and construction. EERI 84-04, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA, 1984.
7. ATC. ATC-58 Project Task Report, Phase 2, Task 2.3, Engineering Demand Parameters for Nonstructural Components. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA, 2004.
8. ATC. Guidelines for Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings - 25% Complete Draft - ATC-58 Project Task Report. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA, 2005.
9. Miranda E, Taghavi S. Approximate floor acceleration demands in multistory buildings. 1: formulation. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2005; 131(2):203-211.
10. Singh MP, Moreschi LM, Suarez LE, Matheu EE. Seismic design forces. I: rigid nonstructural components. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2006; 132(10):1524-1532.
11. Medina RA, Sankaranarayanan R, Kingston KM. Floor response spectra for light components mounted on regular moment-resisting frame structures. Engineering Structures 2006; 28(14):1927-1940.
12. Sankaranarayanan R, Medina RA. Estimation of seismic acceleration demands of nonstructural components exposed to near-fault ground motions. First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006; Paper Number 1248.
13. ASCE. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, SEI/ASCE 7-02. ASCE Standard No. 7-02, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2003.
14. BSSC. The 2003 NEHRP Recommended Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures Parts 1 and 2: Provisions and Commentary (FEMA 450). Washington, DC, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2003.
15. ICC. 2003 International Building Code. International Code Council: Falls Church, VA, 2003.
16. Villaverde R. Approximate procedure for the seismic nonlinear analysis of nonstructural components in buildings. Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering 2005; 7(1):9-24.
17. Sewell RT, Cornell CA, Toro GR, Mcguire RK, Kassawara RP, Singh A, Stepp JC. Factors influencing equipment response in linear and nonlinear structures. In Ninth International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland, Wittmann FH (ed.). AA Balkema: Rotterdam, 1987; 849-856.
18. Singh MP, Chang TS, Suarez LE. Floor response spectrum amplification due to yielding of supporting structure. Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, 1996.
19. Singh MP, Moreschi LM, Suarez LE, Matheu EE. Seismic design forces. II: flexible nonstructural components. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2006; 132(10):1533-1542.
20. Villaverde R. Simple method to estimate the seismic nonlinear response of nonstructural components in buildings. Engineering Structures 2006; 28(8):1209-1221.
21. Sewell RT, Cornell CA, Toro GR, McGuire RK. A study of factors influencing floor response spectra in nonlinear multi-degree-of-freedom structures. JABEEC Report No. 82, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, 1986.
22. Medina RA, Krawinkler H. Seismic demands for nondeteriorating frame structures and their dependence on ground motions. PEER Report 2003/ 15, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA, 2004.
23. Medina RA, Krawinkler H. Influence of hysteretic behavior on the nonlinear response of frame structures. Thirteenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 13WCEE, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2004; Paper Code 239.
24. Sankaranarayanan R. Seismic response of acceleration-sensitive nonstructural components mounted on moment-resisting frame structures. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 2007.
25. Goel RK, Chopra AK. Period formulas for moment-resisting frame buildings. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1997; 123(11):1454-1461.
26. Goel RK, Chopra AK. Period formulas for concrete shear wall buildings. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1998; 124(4):426-433.
27. Crowley H, Pinho R. Period-height relationship for existing European reinforced concrete buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2004; 8:93-119.
28. Medina RA, Krawinkler H. Strength demand issues relevant for the seismic design of moment-resisting frames. Earthquake Spectra 2005; 21(2):415-439.
29. PEER. PEER Strong Motion Database. 2003 [cited December, 2003]; available at: http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat
30. Villaverde R. Seismic analysis and design of nonstructural components. In Earthquake Engineering: From Engineering Seismology to Performance-based Engineering, Bozorgnia Y, Bertero VV (eds). CRC: Boca Raton, FL, 2004.
31. Lin J, Mahin SA. Seismic response of light subsystems on inelastic structures. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1985; 111(2):400-417.
32. Singh MP, Suarez LE, Matheu EE, Maldonado GO. Simplified procedures for seismic design of nonstructural components and assessment of current code provisions. NCEER-93-0013, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 1993.
33. Kawakatsu T, Kitade K, Takemori T, Kuwabara Y, Ogiwara Y. Floor response spectra considering elasto-plastic behavior of nuclear facilities. In Transactions of the 5th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Jaeger T, Boley BA (eds). North-Holland Pub. Co. for the Commission of the European Communities: Berlin, Germany, 1979.
34. Kennedy RP, Short SA, Newmark NM. The response of a nuclear power plant to near-field moderate magnitude earthquakes. Transactions of the 6th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Palais des Congres. North-Holland Pub. Co. for the Commission of the European Communities: Paris, France, 1981.
35. Wesley DA, Hashimoto PS. Nonlinear structural response characteristics of nuclear power plant shear wall structures. Transactions of the 6th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Palais des Congres. North-Holland Pub. Co. for the Commission of the European Communities: Paris, France, 1981.
36. Bumpus S, Johnson J, Smith P. Best estimate method versus evaluation method: a comparison of two techniques in evaluating seismic analysis and design. UCRL52746; NUREGCR1489, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 1980.
37. LLNL. Seismic safety margins research program. Executive summary 1, best estimate versus evaluation method. Report LLL-TB-026. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: Livermore, CA, 1980.
38. Toro GR, McGuire RK, Cornell CA, Sewell RT. Linear and nonlinear response of structures and equipment to California and Eastern United States earthquakes. EPRI Report NP-5566, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, 1989.
39. Chen YQ, Soong TT. Seismic response of secondary systems. Engineering Structures 1988; 10(4):218-228.
40. Soong TT. Seismic behavior of nonstructural elements state-of-art report. Tenth European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vienna, Austria, 1994.
41. Phan LT, Taylor AW. State of the art report on seismic design requirements for nonstructural building components. Report NISTIR 5857, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburgh, MD, 1996.
42. Villaverde R. Seismic design of secondary structures: state of the art. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1997; 123(8):1011-1019.
43. Gupta AK. Response Spectrum Method in Seismic Analysis and Design of Structures. Blackwell Scientific Publications: Boston, MA, 1990.
44. Cornell CA, Sewell RT. Equipment response in linear and non-linear nuclear power plant structures: small-magnitude versus design-type motions. Proceedings: Engineering Characterization of Small-magnitude Earthquakes, Palo Alto, CA, U.S.A., 27-29 January 1987, EPRI NP-6389, Electric Power Research Institute, 1987.
45. Nayfeh AH, Mook DT. Nonlinear Oscillations. Wiley: New York, 1979.
46. Mojaddidy Z, Mook DT, Nayfeh AH. Nonlinear analysis of the aperiodic responses of beams. Sixth Canadian Conference of Applied Mechanics, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 1977.
47. Ye LP, Otani S. Maximum seismic displacement of inelastic systems based on energy concept. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999; 28(12):1483-1499.