The first phenetic analysis of species limits in Bertya (Euphorbiaceae)

Australian Systematic Botany

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 448-463

  Fatemi, M ^a   Gross, C L ^a   Bruhl, J J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; ENDANGERED SPECIES; MORPHOLOGY; NEW GENUS; NEW TAXON; PHYTOGEOGRAPHY; TAXONOMY;

BERTYA; EUPHORBIA; EUPHORBIACEAE;

EID: 35948952353     PISSN: 10301887     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/SB06019     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Andersson L (1990) The driving force: species concepts and ecology. Taxon 39, 375-382. doi: 10.2307/1223084
2. Baillon HE (1866) Species Euphorbiacearum Euphorbiacées Australiennes. Adansonia 6, 313-317.
3. Barker B (2005) Standardising informal names in Australian publications. ASBS Newsletter 122, 11-12.
4. Belbin L (1991) Semi-strong hybrid scaling, a new ordination algorithm. Journal of Vegetation Science 2, 491-496. doi: 10.2307/3236031
5. Belbin L (1993) 'PATN pattern analysis package. Users guide.' (CSIRO, Division of Wildlife and Ecology: Canberra)
6. Benstead JP, Douglas MM, Pringle CM (2003) Relationships of stream invertebrate communities to deforestation in Eastern Madagascar. Ecological Applications 13, 1473-1490. doi: 10.1890/02-5125
7. Bentham G (1873) 'Flora Australiensis: a description of plants of the Australian territory.' (L. Reeve & Co.: London)
8. Blakely WF (1929) A further contribution to our knowledge of the flora of New South Wales. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 54, 681-685.
9. Blakely WF (1941) Additions to the Australian flora. Contributions from the New South Wales National Herbarium 1, 120-124.
10. Bremer B, Struwe L (1992) Phylogeny of the Rubiaceae and the Loganiaceae: congruence or conflict between morphological and molecular data? American Journal of Botany 79, 1171-1184. doi: 10.2307/2445217
11. Briggs JD, Leigh JH (1995) 'Rare or threatened Australian plants.' (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)
12. Brown EA, Wiecek BM (1996) Morphological variation in Leucopogon rufus Lindl.: a preliminary study. Annals of Botany 77, 327-331. doi: 10.1006/anbo.1996.0039
13. Burke JM, Adams P (2002) Variation in the Dendrobium speciosum (Orchidaceae) complex: a numerical approach to the species problem. Australian Systematic Botany 15, 63-80. doi: 10.1071/SB01005
14. Cracraft J (2002) The seven great questions of systematic biology: an essential foundation for conservation and the sustainable use of biodiversity. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 89, 127-144. doi: 10.2307/3298558
15. Crisp M, Chandler G (1996) Paraphyletic species. Telopea 6, 813-844.
16. Crisp MD, Weston PH (1993) Geographic and ontogenetic variation in morphology of Australian Waratahs (Telopea: Proteaceae). Systematic Biology 42, 49-76. doi: 10.2307/2992556
17. Dallwitz MJ, Paine TA, Zurcher EJ (1993 onwards) 'User's guide to the DELTAsystem: a general system for processing taxonomic descriptions.' 4th edn. http://delta-intkey.com.
18. Delaporte KL, Collins GG, Conran JG, Sedgley M (2001) Molecular analysis of an interspecific hybrid ornamental eucalypt for parental identification. Euphytica 122, 165-170. doi: 10.1023/A:1012619314419
19. Faith DP, Minchin PR, Belbin L (1987) Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance. Vegetatio 69, 57-68. doi: 10.1007/BF00038687
20. Gower JC (1971) A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27, 857-871. doi: 10.2307/2528823
21. Gower JC, Legendre P (1986) Metric and Euclidean properties of dissimilarity coefficients. Journal of Classification 3, 5-48. doi: 10.1007/BF01896809
22. Grüning G (1913) (Ed.) 'Euphorbiaceae-Porantheroideae et Ricinocarpoideae.' Das Pflanzenreich. (Verlag von H. R. Engelmann Wienheim: Bergstrabe)
23. Guymer GP (1985) A name change in the genus Bertya (Euphorbiaceae). Austrobaileya 2, 147.
24. Guymer GP (1988) Notes on Bertya Planchon (Euphorbiaceae). Austrobaileya 2, 427-431.
25. Halford DA, Henderson RJF (2002) Studies in Euphorbiaceae A.L.Juss. sens. lat. 3. A revision of Bertya Planch. (Ricinocarpeae Müll. Arg., Bertyinae Müll. Arg.). Austrobaileya 6, 187-245.
26. Henderson A (2005) The methods of herbarium taxonomy. Systematic Botany 30, 456-459. doi: 10.1600/0363644054223701
27. Hodgon J, Bruhl JJ, Wilson KL (2006) Systematic studies in Lepidosperma (Cyperaceae: Schoeneae) with particular reference to L. laterale. Australian Systematic Botany 19, 273-288. doi: 10.1071/SB06007
28. Holmgren PK, Holmgren NH (1998) [continuously updated]. 'Index Herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff.' (New York Botanical Garden's Virtual Herbarium.) http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/
29. Holmgren PK, Holmgren N, Barnett LC (1990) 'Index Herbariorum: part 1: the herbaria of the world.' (New York Botanical Gardens: New York)
30. James TA (1998) Bertya ingramii (Euphorbiaceae), a new species from New South Wales. Telopea 3, 285-286.
31. James TA, Harden GJ (1990) Euphorbiaceae. In 'Flora of New South Wales'. (Ed. GJ Harden) pp. 389-430. (New South Wales University Press: Sydney)
32. Kraaijeveld K (2000) The phylogenetic species concept and its place in modern evolutionary thinking. Ardea 88, 73-90.
33. Krauss S (1996) A multivariate analysis of geographic variation in morphology in Persoonia mollis (Proteaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 202, 65-90. doi: 10.1007/BF00985818
34. Luckow M (1995) Species concepts: assumptions, methods, and applications. Systematic Botany 20, 589-605. doi: 10.2307/2419812
35. Marchant R, Barmuta LA, Chessman BC (1994) Preliminary study of the ordination and classification of macroinvertebrate communities from running waters in Victoria, Australia. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 45, 945-962. doi: 10.1071/MF9940945
36. Moore SLM (1905) Alabastra Diversa. Part 12. Sertulum Asiatico-Australiense. Journal of Botany 43, 137-150.
37. von Mueller FJH (1882) Definitions of some new Australian plants. The Southern Science Record 98.
38. Müller J (1865) Euphorbiaceae. Vorläufige Mittheilungen aus dem für DeCandolle's Prodromus bestimmten Manuscript über diese Familie. Linnaea 34, 1-224.
39. Müller J (1866) Euphorbiaceae. In 'Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis'. (Ed. AP de Candolle) pp. 189-214. (Masson: Paris)
40. Noor MAF (2002) Is the biological species concept showing its age? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17, 153-154. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02452-7
41. Planchon JE (1845) Description de deux Euphorbiacées. London Journal of Botany 4, 471-474.
42. Scott B, Gross CL (2004) Recovery directions for monoecious and endangered Bertya ingramii using autoecology and comparisons with common B. rosmarinifolia (Euphorbiaceae). Biodiversity and Conservation 13, 885-899. doi: 10.1023/B:BIOC.0000014458.16767.d4
43. Stuessy TF (1990) 'Plant taxonomy: the systematic evaluation of comparative data.' (Columbia University: New York)
44. Webster GL (1994) Systematics of the Euphorbiaceae: introduction. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 81, 1-2.
45. White CT (1939) Contributions to the Queensland flora. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Queensland 50, 86.
46. Wiens JJ (1998) The accuracy of methods for coding and sampling higherlevel taxa for phylogenetic analysis: a simulation study. Systematic Biology 47, 397-413. doi: 10.1080/106351598260789
47. Wilkinson M (1995) Coping with abundant missing entries in phylogenetic inference using parsimony. Systematic Biology 44, 501-514. doi: 10.2307/2413657
48. Wills KE, Whalley RDB, Bruhl JJ (2000) Systematic studies in Paniceae (Poaceae): Homopholis and Whalleya gen. et sp. nov. Australian Systematic Botany 13, 437-468. doi: 10.1071/SB99007
49. Wurdack KJ, Hoffmann P, Chase MW (2005) Molecular phylogenetic analysis of uniovulate Euphorbiaceae (Euphorbiaceae sensu stricto) using plastid RBCL and TRNL-F DNA sequences. American Journal of Botany 92, 1397-1420.