The methods of herbarium taxonomy

Systematic Botany

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 456-459

  Henderson, Andrew ^a  

^a NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 20744439700     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1600/0363644054223701     Document Type: Note

References (19)

1. BROWER, A. 1999. Delimitation of phylogenetic species with DNA sequences: a critique of Davis and Nixon's Population Aggregation Analysis. Systematic Biology 48: 199-213.
2. CARPENTER, J. 2003. Critique of pure folly. Botanical Review 69: 79-92.
3. DAVIS, J. and K. NIXON. 1992. Populations, genetic variation, and the delimitation of phylogenetic species. Systematic Biology 41: 421-435.
4. DE QUEIROZ, K. 1998. The general lineage concept of species, species criteria, and the process of speciation: a conceptual unification and terminological recommendations. Pp. 57-75 in Endless forms - species and speciation, eds. D. Howard and S. Berlocher. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. HENDERSON, A. 2004. A multivariate analysis of Hyospathe (Palmae). American Journal of Botany 91: 953-965.
6. JENSEN, R. 2003. The conundrum of morphometrics. Taxon 52: 663-671.
7. _, K. CIOFANI, and L. MIRAMOTES. 2002. Lines, outlines, and landmarks: morphometric analyses of leaves of Acer rubrum, Acer saccharinum (Aceraceae) and their hybrid. Taxon 51: 475-492.
8. LUCKOW, M. 1995. Species concepts: assumptions, methods, and applications. Systematic Botany 20: 589-605.
9. MACLEOD, N. and P. FOREY. 2002. Morphology, shape and phylogeny. Systematics Association Special Volume 64.
10. MAYDEN, R. 1997. A hierarchy of species concepts: the denouement in the saga of the species problem. Pp. 381-424 in Species: the units of biodiversity, eds. M. Claridge, H. Dawah and M. Wilson. London: Chapman and Hall.
11. NIXON, K. and Q. WHEELER. 1990. An amplification of the phylogenetic species concept. Cladistics 6: 211-223.
12. SIMPSON, G. 1961. Principles of animal taxonomy. New York: Columbia University Press.
13. SITES, J. and J. CRANDALL. 1997. Testing species boundaries in biodiversity studies. Conservation Biology 11: 1289-1297.
14. _ and J. MARSHALL. 2003. Delimiting species: a Renaissance issue in systematic biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 462-470.
15. STEVENS, P. 1991. Character states, morphological variation, and phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Botany 16: 553-583.
16. _. 2000. Botanical systematics 1950-2000: change, progress, or both? Taxon 49: 635-659.
17. THIELE, K. 1993. The holy grail of the perfect character: the cladistic treatment of morphometric data. Cladistics 9: 275-304.
18. WHEELER, Q. 2004. Taxonomic triage and the poverty of phylogeny. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London B 359: 571-583.
19. _ and N. PLATNICK. 2000. The phylogenetic species concept (sensu Wheeler and Platnick). Pp. 55-69 in Species concepts and phylogenetic theory. A debate, eds. Q. Wheeler & R. Meier. New York: Columbia University Press.