Learning large-scale spatial relationships in a maze and effects of MK-801 on retrieval in the rhesus monkey

Developmental Neurobiology

Volumn 67, Issue 13, 2007, Pages 1731-1741

  Jian, Hong Wang ^a,b,c   Zhang, Bo ^a,b,c   Zhi, Qiang Meng ^a,b,c   Ning, Lei Sun ^a,b,c   Man, Xiu Ma ^d   Hua, Xian Zhang ^a,b   Tang, Xiangdong ^e   Sanford, Larry D ^e   Wilson, Fraser A W ^a,b   Xin, Tian Hu ^a,b   Carlson, Synnöve ^f,g   Ma, Yuan Ye ^a,b  

^a KUNMING INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^d JILIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^e EASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^g TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Maze; MK 801; Rhesus monkey; Spatial memory; Working memory

Indexed keywords

DIZOCILPINE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; FOOD; HUMAN CHARACTERISTIC; LEARNING; MALE; MAZE TEST; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; NONHUMAN; PRIMATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RHESUS MONKEY; SPATIAL MEMORY; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL MEMORY; WORKING MEMORY;

ANIMALS; DIZOCILPINE MALEATE; EXCITATORY AMINO ACID ANTAGONISTS; MACACA MULATTA; MALE; MAZE LEARNING; MEMORY; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 35848970782     PISSN: 19328451     EISSN: 1932846X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dneu.20547     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Astur RS, Taylor LB, Mamelak AN, Philpott L, Sutherland RJ. 2002. Humans with hippocampus damage display severe spatial memory impairments in a virtual Morris water task. Behav Brain Res 132:77-84.
2. Bast T, da Silva BM, Morris RG. 2005. Distinct contributions of hippocampal NMDA and AMPA receptors to encoding and retrieval of one-trial place memory. J Neurosci 25:5845-5856.
3. Benvenga MJ, Spaulding TC. 1988. Amnesic effect of the novel anticonvulsant MK-801. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 30:205-207.
4. Bohbot VD, Jech R, Ruzicka E, Nadel L, Kalina M, Stepankova K, Bures J. 2002. Rat spatial memory tasks adapted for humans: Characterization in subjects with intact brain and subjects with selective medial temporal lobe thermal lesions. Physiol Res 51 (Suppl 1):S49-S65.
5. Buffalo EA, Gillam MP, Allen RR, Paule MG. 1994. Acute behavioral effects of MK-801 in rhesus monkeys: Assessment using an operant test battery. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 48:935-940.
6. Collingridge GL, Bliss TV. 1995. Memories of NMDA receptors and LTP. Trends Neurosci 18:54-56.
7. de Jong IC, Prelle IT, van de Burgwal JA, Lambooij E, Korte SM, Blokhuis HJ, Koolhaas JM. 2000. Effects of environmental enrichment on behavioral responses to novelty, learning, and memory, and the circadian rhythm in Cortisol in growing pigs. Physiol Behav 68:571-578.
8. Driscoll I, Hamilton DA, Yeo RA, Brooks WM, Sutherland RJ. 2005. Virtual navigation in humans: The impact of age, sex, and hormones on place learning. Horm Behav 47:326-335.
9. Dudchenko PA. 2001. How do animals actually solve the T maze? Behav Neurosci 115:850-860.
10. Ehlers CL, Kaneko WM, Wall TL, Chaplin RI. 1992. Effects of dizocilpine (MK-801) and ethanol on the EEG and event-related potentials (ERPS) in rats. Neuropharmacology 31:369-378.
11. Filliat P, Blanchet G. 1995. Effects of TCP on spatial memory: Comparison with MK-801. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 51:429-434.
12. Gilbert DB, Patterson TA, Rose SP. 1989. Midazolam induces amnesia in a simple, one-trial, maze-learning task in young chicks. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 34:439-442.
13. Harrod SB, Flint RW, Riccio DC. 2001. MK-801 induced retrieval, but not acquisition, deficits for passive avoidance conditioning. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 69:585593.
14. Heale V, Harley C. 1990. MK-801 and AP5 impair acquisition, but not retention, of the Morris milk maze. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 36:145-149.
15. Hlinak Z, Krejci I. 2003. N-methyl-D-aspartate prevented memory deficits induced by MK-801 in mice. Physiol Res 52:809-812.
16. Kentros C, Hargreaves E, Hawkins RD, Kandel ER, Shapiro M, Muller RV. 1998. Abolition of long-term stability of new hippocampal place cell maps by NMDA receptor blockade. Science 280:2121-2126.
17. Kretschmer BD, Fink S. 1999. Spatial learning deficit after NMDA receptor blockade and state-dependency. Behav Pharmacol 10:423-428.
18. Laughlin K, Mendl M. 2000. Pigs shift too: Foraging strategies and spatial memory in the domestic pig. Anim Behav 60:403-410.
19. Mondadori C, Weiskrantz L. 1993. NMDA receptor blockers facilitate and impair learning via different mechanisms. Behav Neural Biol 60:205-210.
20. Morris R. 1984. Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat. J Neurosci Methods 11:47-60.
21. Morris RG, Anderson E, Lynch GS, Baudry M. 1986. Selective impairment of learning and blockade of long-term potentiation by an N-methyl-D- aspartate receptor antagonist, AP5. Nature 319:774-776.
22. Nakazawa K, Quirk MC, Chitwood RA, Watanabe M, Yeckel MF, Sun LD, Kato A, et al. 2002. Requirement for hippocampal CA3 NMDA receptors in associative memory recall. Science 297:211-218.
23. Parwani A, Weiler MA, Blaxton TA, Warfel D, Hardin M, Frey K, Lahti AC. 2005. The effects of a subanesthetic dose of ketamine on verbal memory in normal volunteers. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 183:265-274.
24. Paule MG, Fogle CM, Allen RR, Pearson EC, Hammond TG, Popke EJ. 2003. Chronic exposure to NMDA receptor and sodium channel blockers during development in monkeys and rats: Long-term effects on cognitive function. Ann N Y Acad Sci 993:116-122.
25. Popke EJ, Allen RR, Pearson EC, Hammond TG, Paule MG. 2001. Differential effects of two NMDA receptor antagonists on cognitive-behavioral performance in young non-human primates II. Neurotoxicol Teratol 23:333-347.
26. Robledo P, Lumeng L, Li TK, Ehlers CL. 1994. Effects of MK 801 and diazepam on the EEG of P and NP rats. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 18:363-368.
27. Rockstroh S, Emre M, Tarral A, Pokorny R. 1996. Effects of the novel NMDA-receptor antagonist SDZ EAA 494 on memory and attention in humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 124:261-266.
28. Shapiro ML, O'Connor C. 1992. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist MK-801 and spatial memory representation: Working memory is impaired in an unfamiliar environment but not in a familiar environment. Behav Neurosci 106:604-612.
29. Tan H, Meng ZQ, Liu N, Ma YY, Wilson AWF. 2006. A training program for visual discrimination tasks in monkeys. Zoology Res 27:601-605.
30. Tsukada H, Nishiyama S, Fukumoto D, Sato K, Kakiuchi T, Domino EF. 2005. Chronic NMDA antagonism impairs working memory, decreases extracellular dopamine, and increases D1 receptor binding in prefrontal cortex of conscious monkeys. Neuropsychopharmacology 30:1861-1869.
31. Wang JH, Fu Y, Wilson FA, Ma YY. 2006. Ketamine affects memory consolidation: Differential effects in T-maze and passive avoidance paradigms in mice. Neuroscience 140:993-1002.
32. Washburn DA, Astur RS. 2003. Exploration of virtual mazes by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Anim Cogn 6:161-168.
33. Whishaw IQ, Auer RN. 1989. Immediate and long-lasting effects of MK-801 on motor activity, spatial navigation in a swimming pool and EEG in the rat. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 98:500-507.