Genetic variation and structure of Chinook salmon life history types in the snake river

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Volumn 136, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1252-1262

  Narum, Shawn R ^a   Stephenson, Jeffrey J ^a   Campbell, Matthew R ^b  

^a Hagerman Fish Culture Experiment Station ^*  (United States)

^b IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLONIZATION; DISPERSAL; GENE FLOW; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GENETIC VARIATION; HATCHERY; LIFE HISTORY; METAPOPULATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SALMONID;

NORTH AMERICA; SNAKE RIVER; UNITED STATES;

ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA;

EID: 35848963200     PISSN: 00028487     EISSN: 15488659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/T06-240.1     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Banks, M. A., M. S. Blouin, B. A. Baldwin, V. K. Rashbrook, H. A. Fitzgerald, S. M. Blankenship, and D. Hedgecock. 1999. Isolation and inheritance of novel microsatellites in Chinook salmon. Journal of Heredity 90:281-288.
2. Beacham, T. D., J. R. Candy, K. L. Jonsen, J. Supernault, M. Wetklo, L. Deng, K. M. Miller, and R. E. Withler. 2006. Estimation of stock composition and individual identification of Chinook salmon across the Pacific Rim using microsatellite variation. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 135:861-888.
3. Beacham, T. D., K. J. Supernault, M. Wetklo, B. Deagle, K. Labaree, J. R. Irvine, J. R. Candy, K. M. Miller, R. J. Nelson, and R. E. Withler. 2003. The geographic basis for population structure in the Fraser River Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 101:229-242.
4. Benjamini, Y., and D. Yekutieli. 2001. The control of false discovery rate under dependency. Annals of Statistics 29:1165-1188.
5. Brannon, E. L., M. S. Powell, T. P. Quinn, and A. J. Talbot. 2004. Population structure of Columbia River basin Chinook salmon and steelhead trout. Reviews in Fisheries Science 12:99-232.
6. Caimey, M., J. B. Taggart, and B. Hoyheim. 2000. Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) and cross-species amplification in other salmonids. Molecular Ecology 9:2175-2178.
7. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and W. W. F. Edwards. 1967. Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Evolution 32:550-570.
8. Connor, W. P., J. G. Sneva, K. F. Tiffan, R. K. Steinhorst, and D. Ross. 2005. Two alternative juvenile life history types for fall Chinook salmon in the Snake River basin. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 134:291-304.
9. Cooper, A. B., and M. Mangel. 1999. The dangers of ignoring metapopulation structure for the conservation of salmonids. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 97:213-226.
10. Crateau, E. 1997. Straying of hatchery origin spring/summer-run Chinook salmon in the Grande Ronde basin. Pages 9-15 in W. S. Grant, editor. Genetic effects of straying of nonnative fish hatchery fish into natural populations: proceedings of the workshop. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-30.
11. Duchesne, P., and L. Bernatchez. 2002. An analytical investigation of the dynamics of inbreeding in multigeneration supportive breeding. Conservation Genetics 3:47-60.
12. Felsenstein, J. 1993. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package), version 3.5c. Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle.
13. Ford, M. J. 2002. Selection in captivity during supportive breeding may reduce fitness in the wild. Conservation Biology 16:815-825.
14. Ford, M. J., T. A. Lundrigan, and P. C. Moran. 2004. Population genetics of Entiat River spring Chinook salmon. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-60.
15. Garza, J. C., and E. G. Williamson. 2001. Detection of reduction in population size using data from microsatellite loci. Molecular Ecology 10:305-318.
16. Gilligan, D. M., and R. Frankham. 2003. Dynamics of genetic adaptation to captivity. Conservation Genetics 4:189-197.
17. Goudet, J. 2001. FSTAT: a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices, version 2.9.3. Available: www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/ fstat.html. (June 2006).
18. Greig, C., and M. A. Banks. 1999. Five multiplexed microsatellite loci for rapid response run identification of California's endangered winter Chinook salmon. Animal Genetics 30:316-317.
19. Greig, C., D. P. Jacobson, and M. A. Banks. 2003. New tetranucleotide microsatellites for fine-scale discrimination among endangered Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Molecular Ecology Notes 3:376-379.
20. Healey, M. C. 1991. Life history of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Pages 311-395 in C. Groot and L. Margolis, editors. Pacific salmon life histories. UBC Press, Vancouver.
21. Hedrick, P. W. 2005. A standardized genetic differentiation measure. Evolution 59:1633-1638.
22. Hedrick, P. W., D. Hedgecock, S. Hamelberg, and S. J. Croci. 2000. The impact of supplementation in winter-run Chinook salmon on effective population size. Journal of Heredity 91:112-116.
23. Isaak, D. J., and R. F. Thurow. 2006. Network-scale spatial and temporal variation in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) redd distributions: patterns inferred from spatially continuous replicate surveys. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63:285-296.
24. Isaak, D. J., R. F. Thurow, B. E. Rieman, and J. B. Dunham. 2003. Temporal variation in synchrony among Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) redd counts from a wilderness area in central Idaho. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60:840-848.
25. Kalinowski, S. T. 2005. HP-Rare: a computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic diversity. Molecular Ecology Notes 5:187-189.
26. Keifer, S., M. Rowe, and K. Hatch. 1992. Stock summary reports for Columbia River anadromous salmonids, volume V. Idaho. Bonneville Power Administration, Project 88-108, Portland, Oregon.
27. Liss, W. J., J. A. Stanford, J. A. Lichatowich, R. N. Williams, C. C. Coutant, P. R. Mundy, and R. R. Whitney. 2005. Developing a new conceptual foundation for salmon conservation. Pages 51-98 in R. N. Williams, editor. Return to the river: restoring salmon to the Columbia River. Elsevier, Burlington, Massachusetts.
28. LSRCP (Lower Snake River Compensation Plan). 1998. Proceedings of the Lower Snake River Compensation Plan status review symposium. Available: www.fws.gov/lsnakecomplan/Reports/LSRCP/LSRCPStatusReview.pdf. (June 2006).
29. McConnaha, W. E., R. N. Williams, and J. A. Lichatowich. 2005. The problem of the Columbia River salmon. Pages 1-28 in R. N. Williams, editor. Return to the river: restoring salmon to the Columbia River. Elsevier, Burlington, Massachusetts.
30. Myers, J. M., R. G. Kope, G. J. Bryant, D. Teel, L. J. Lierheimer, T. C. Wainwright, W. S. Grant, F. W. Waknitz, K. Neely, S. T. Lindley, and R. S. Waples. 1998. Status review of Chinook salmon from Washington, Idaho, Oregon, and California. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-35.
31. Narum, S. R. 2006. Beyond Bonferroni: less conservative analyses for conservation genetics. Conservation Genetics 7:783-787.
32. Narum, S. R., W. D. Arnsberg, A. J. Talbot, and M. S. Powell. In press. Reproductive isolation following reintroduction of Chinook salmon with alternative life histories. Conservation Genetics, DOI: 10.1007/s10592-006-9268- 9.
33. Narum, S. R., M. S. Powell, and A. J. Talbot. 2004. A distinctive microsatellite locus that differentiates ocean-type from stream-type Chinook salmon in the interior Columbia River basin. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 133:1051-1055.
34. Neville, H., D. Isaak, R. Thurow, J. Dunham, and B. Rieman. 2007. Microsatellite variation reveals weak genetic structure and retention of genetic variability in threatened Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) within a Snake River watershed. Conservation Genetics 8:133-147.
35. Olsen, J. B., P. Bentzen, M. Banks, J. B. Shaklee, and S. Young. 2000. Microsatellites reveal population identity of individual pink salmon to allow supportive breeding of a population at risk of extinction. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129:232-242.
36. Olsen, J. B., P. Bentzen, and J. E. Seeb. 1998. Characterization of seven microsatellite loci derived from pink salmon. Molecular Ecology 7:1083-1090.
37. Quinn, T. P. 1993. A review of homing and straying of wild and hatchery-produced salmon. Fisheries Research 18:29-44.
38. Quinn, T. P., and A. H. Dittman. 1990. Pacific salmon migrations and homing: mechanisms and adaptive significance. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 5:174-177.
39. Raymond, M., and F. Rousset. 1995. GENEPOP, version 1.2: population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86:248-249.
40. Rexroad, C. E., III, R. L. Coleman, A. M. Martin, W. K. Hershberger, and J. Killefer. 2001. Thirty-five polymorphic microsatellite markers for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Animal Genetics 32:317-319.
41. Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223-225.
42. Ryman, N., P. E. Jorde, and L. Laikre. 1994. Supportive breeding and variance effective population size. Conservation Biology 9:1619-1628.
43. Ryman, N., and F. Utter. 1987. Population genetics and fishery management. University of Washington Press, Seattle.
44. Shaklee, J. B., T. D. Beacham, L. Seeb, and B. White. 1999. Managing Pacific salmon fisheries using genetic data: case studies from four species of Pacific salmon. Fisheries Research 43:45-78.
45. Shrimpton, J. M., and D. D. Heath. 2003. Census vs. effective population size in Chinook salmon: large- and small-scale environmental perturbation effects. Molecular Ecology 12:2571-2583.
46. Teel, D. J., G. B. Milner, G. A. Winans, and W. S. Grant. 2000. Genetic population structure and origin of life history types in Chinook salmon in British Columbia, Canada. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129:194-209.
47. Utter, F., G. Milner, G. Stahl, and D. Teel. 1989. Genetic population structure of Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, in the Pacific Northwest. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 87:239-264.
48. Wang, W., and N. Ryman. 2001. Genetic effects of multiple generations of supportive breeding. Conservation Biology 15:1619-1631.
49. Waples, R. S. 1994. Genetic considerations in recovery efforts for Pacific salmon. Conservation Biology 8:884-886.
50. Waples, R. S., O. W. Johnson, P. B. Aebersold, C. K. Shiflett, D. M. VanDoornik, D. J. Teel, and A. E. Cook. 1993. A genetic monitoring and evaluation program for supplemented populations of salmon and steelhead in the Snake River basin. Annual report to the Bonneville Power Administration. Bonneville Power Administration, DOE/BP-00911-2, Portland, Oregon. Available: www.efw.bpa.gov/Publications/I00911-2.pdf. (June 2006).
51. Waples, R. S., D. J. Teel, J. M. Myers, and A. R. Marshall. 2004. Life history divergence in Chinook salmon: historical contingency and parallel evolution. Evolution 58:386-403.
52. Weir, B. S., and C. C. Cockerham. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358-1370.
53. Whitney, R. R., C. C. Coutant, and P. R. Mundy. 2005. Mitigation of salmon losses due to hydroelectric development. Pages 325-416 in R. N. Williams, editor. Return to the river: restoring salmon to the Columbia River. Elsevier, Burlington, Massachusetts.
54. Williamson, K. S., J. F. Cordes, and B. May. 2002. Characterization of microsatellite loci in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and cross-species amplification in other salmonids. Molecular Ecology Notes 2:17-19.
55. Winans, G. A. 1989. Genetic variability in Chinook salmon stocks from the Columbia River basin. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 9:47-52.