Reproductive isolation following reintroduction of Chinook salmon with alternative life histories

Conservation Genetics

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1123-1132

  Narum, Shawn R ^a   Arnsberg, William D ^b   Talbot, Andre J ^a,d   Powell, Madison S ^c  

^a Columbia River Inter Tribal Fish Commission ^*  (United States)

^b Nez Perce Tribe   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

^d ENVIRONMENT CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Chinook salmon; Life history; Microsatellites; Reintroduction

Indexed keywords

ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT; GENE FLOW; HABITAT MANAGEMENT; LIFE HISTORY; REINTRODUCTION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SALMONID;

CLEARWATER RIVER [IDAHO]; IDAHO; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA;

EID: 34547433021     PISSN: 15660621     EISSN: 15729737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-006-9268-9     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Achord S, Matthews GM, Johnson OW, Marsh DM (1996) Use of passive integrated transponder(PIT) tags to monitor migration timing of Snake River Chinook salmon smolts. N Am J Fish Manage 16:302-313
2. Beacham TD, Supernault KJ, Wetklo M, Deagle B, Labaree K, Irvine JR, Candy JR, Miller KM, Nelson RJ, Withler RE (2003) The geographic basis for population structure in the Fraser River Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Fish Bull (US) 101:229-242
3. Beacham TD, Jonsen KL, Supernault KJ, Wetklo M, Deng L, Varnavskaya N (2006) Pacific Rim population structure of Chinook salmon as determined from microsatellite analysis. Trans Am Fish Soc 135:1604-1621
4. Beckman BR, Dickhoff WW (1998) Plasticity of smolting in spring Chinook salmon: relation to growth and insulin-like growth factor-I. J Fish Bio 53:808-826
5. Bell M (2001) Lateral plate evolution in the threespine stickleback: getting nowhere fast. Genetica 112-113:445-461
6. Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D (2001) The control of false discovery rate under dependency. Ann Stat 29:1165-1188
7. Bowles, E, Leitzinger E (1991) Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Salmon Supplementation Studies In Idaho Rivers (Idaho Supplementation Studies) Experimental Design. Report to Bonneville Power administration, Project No. 198909800, BPA Report DOE/BP-01466-1, 200 pp
8. Brannon EL, Powell MS, Quinn TP, Talbot AJ (2004) Population structure of Columbia River Basin Chinook salmon and steelhead trout. Res Fish Sci 12:99-232
9. Burger CV, Scribner KT, Spearman WJ, Swanton CO, Campton DE (2000) Genetic contribution of three introduced life history forms of sockeye salmon to colonization of Frazer Lake, Alaska. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:2096-2111
10. Clarke WC, Withler RE, Shelbourn JE (1994) Inheritance of smolting phenotypes in backcrosses of hybrid stream-type X ocean-type Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Estuaries 17:13-25
11. Connor WP, Burge HL, Waitt R, Bjornn TC (2002) Juvenile life history of wild fall Chinook salmon in the Snake and Clearwater rivers. N Am J Fish Manage 22:703-712
12. Connor WP, Sneva JG, Tiffan KF, Steinhorst RK, Ross D (2005) Two alternative juvenile life history types for fall Chinook salmon in the Snake River Basin. Trans Am Fish. Soc 134:291-304
13. Connor WP, Garcia AP (2006) Prespawning movement of wild and hatchery fall Chinook salmon adults in the Snake River. Trans Am Fish Soc 135:297-305
14. Cornuet JM, Piry S, Luikart G, Estoup A, Solignac M (1999) New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. Genetics 153:1989-2000
15. Cummings SA, Brannon EL, Adams KJ, Thorgaard GH (1997) Genetic analyses to establish captive breeding priorities for endangered Snake River sockeye salmon. Conserv Biol 11:662-669
16. Dittman AH, Quinn TP, Nevitt GA (1996) Timing of imprinting to natural and artificial odors by coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:434-442
17. Duchesne P, Bernatchez L (2002) An analytical investigation of the dynamics of inbreeding in multi-generation supportive breeding. Conserv Genet 3:47-60
18. Endler JA (1980) Natural selection on color patterns in Poecilia reticulate. Evolution 34:76-91
19. Endler JA (1995) Multiple-trait coevolution and environmental gradients in guppies. Trends Ecol Evol 10:22-29
20. Ford MJ (1998) Testing models of migration and isolation among populations of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Evolution 52:539-557
21. Ford MJ (2002) Selection in captivity during supportive breeding may reduce fitness in the wild. Conserv. Biol. 16:815-825
22. Frankel OH, Soule ME (1981) Conservation and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, New York
23. Gilbert CH (1912) Age at maturity of Pacific coast salmon of the genus Oncorhynchus. Bull US Fish Comm 32:57-70
24. Gilligan DM, Frankham R (2003) Dynamics of genetic adaptation to captivity. Conserv Genet 4:189-197
25. Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices version 2.9.3. Available from http://www.unil.ch/izea/ softwares/fstat.html
26. Hasler AD, Scholz AT (1983) Olfactory imprinting and homing in salmon: investigations into the mechanism of imprinting process. Zoophysiology, vol 14. Springer-Verlag, New York
27. Healey MC (1991) Life history of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). In: Groot C, Margolis L (eds) Pacific salmon life histories. UBC Press, Vancouver, pp 311-395
28. Hedrick PW, Hedgecock D, Hamelberg S, Croci SJ (2000) The impact of supplementation in winter-run Chinook salmon on effective population size. J Hered 91:112-116
29. Hendry AP (2001) Adaptive divergence and the evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: an empirical demonstration using introduced sockeye salmon. Genetica 112/113:515-534
30. Hendry AP, Kinnison MT (1999) The pace of modern life: measuring rates of contemporary microevolution. Evolution 53:1637-1653
31. Hendry AP, Dittman AH, Hardy RH (2000) Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: evidence from introduced salmon. Science 290:516-518
32. Hendry AP, Castric V, Kinnison MT, Quinn TP (2003) The evolution of philopatry and dispersal: homing vs. straying in salmonids. In: Hendry AP, Stearns SC (eds) Evolution illuminated: salmon and their relatives. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 52-91
33. Kinnison MT, Unwin MJ, Boustead N, Quinn TP (1998) Population specific variation in body dimensions of adult Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from New Zealand and their source population, 90 years after their introduction. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:554-563
34. Kinnison MT, Unwin MJ, Hendry AP, Quinn TP (2001) Migratory costs and the evolution of egg size and number in introduced and indigenous salmon populations. Evolution 55:1656-1667
35. Kwain W, Thomas E (1984) The first evidence of spring spawning by Chinook salmon in Lake Superior. N Am J Fish Manage 4:227-228
36. Luikart G, Cornuet JM (1999) Estimating the effective number of breeders from heterozygote excess in progeny. Genetics 151:1211-1216
37. Marshall AR, Blankenship HL, Connor SP (2000) Genetic characterization of naturally spawned Snake River fall-run Chinook salmon. Trans Am Fish Soc 129:680-698
38. McIssac DO, Quinn TP (1988) Evidence for a hereditary component in homing behavior of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 45:2201-2205
39. Meffe GK, Vrijenhoek LC (1988) Conservation genetics in the management of desert fishes. Conserv Biol 2:157-169
40. Milner AM, Bailey RG (1989) Salmonid colonization of new streams in Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska. Aquacult Fish Manage 20:179-192
41. Morbey Y (2000) Protandry in Pacific salmon. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:1252-1257
42. Narum SR (2006) Beyond Bonferroni: Less conservative analyses for conservation genetics. Cons Gen, DOI 10.1007/s10592-005-9056-y
43. Narum SR, Powell MS, Talbot AJ (2004) A distinctive microsatellite locus that differentiates ocean-type from stream-type Chinook salmon in the interior Columbia River Basin. Trans Am Fish Soc 133:1051-1055
44. Olsen JB, Bentzen P, Seeb JE (1998) Characterization of seven microsatellite loci derived from pink salmon. Mol Ecol 7:1083-1090
45. Olsen JB, Bentzen P, Banks M, Shaklee JB, Young S (2000) Microsatellites reveal population identity of individual pink salmon to allow supportive breeding of a population at risk of extinction. Trans Am Fish Soc 129:232-242
46. Parkhurst ZE (1950) Survey of the Columbia River an its tributaries. Special Scientific Report No. 39, Part 6. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC
47. Paetkau D, Calvert W, Stirling I, Strobeck C (1995) Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Mol Ecol 4:347-354
48. Quinn TP (1993) A review of homing and straying of wild and hatchery-produced salmon. Fish Res 18:29-44
49. Quinn TP, Fresh K (1984) Homing and straying in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from Cowlitz River Hatchery, Washington. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 41:1078-1082
50. Quinn TP, Nemeth RS, McIsaac DO (1991) Homing and straying patterns of fall Chinook salmon in the lower Columbia River. Trans Am Fish Soc 120:150-156
51. Quinn TP, Nielsen JL, Gan C et al (1996) Origin and genetic structure of Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, transplanted from California to New Zealand: allozyme and mtDNA evidence. Fish Bull (US) 94:506-521
52. Quinn TP, Unwin MJ, Kinnison MT (2000) Evolution of temporal isolation in the wild: genetic divergence in timing of migration and breeding in introduced populations of Chinook salmon. Evolution 54:1372-1385
53. Quinn TP, Kinnison MT, Unwin MJ (2001) Evolution of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) populations in New Zealand: pattern, rate, and process. Genetica 112/113:493-513
54. Randall RG, Healey MC, Dempson JB (1987) Variability in length of freshwater residence of salmon, trout, and char. Am Fish Soc Symp 1:27-41
55. Rasmussen C, Ostberg CO, Clifton DR, Holloway JL, Rodriguez RJ (2003) Identification of a genetic marker that discriminates ocean- and stream-type Chinook salmon in the Columbia River Basin. Trans Am Fish Soc 132:131-142
56. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995a) GENEPOP (version 1.2): Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248-249
57. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995b) Testing heterozygote excess and deficiency. Genetics 140:1413-1419
58. Reimers PE (1973) The length of residence of juvenile fall chinook salmon in the Sixes River, Oregon. Oreg Fish Comm 4:1-43
59. Reznick DN, Ghalambor CK (2001) The population ecology of contemporary adaptations: what do empirical studies reveal about the conditions that promote adaptive evolution. Genetica 112/113:183-198
60. Reznick DN, Shaw FH, Rodd FH, Shaw RG (1997) Evaluation of the rate of evolution in natural populations of guppies (Poecilia reticulate). Science 275:1934-1937
61. Schluchter MD, Lichatowich JA (1977) Juvenile life histories of Rogue River spring Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (Walbaum), as determined by scale analysis. Information Report Series, Fisheries Number 77-5. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Corvallis, OR
62. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco
63. Sommer TR, Nobriga ML, Harrell WC, Batham W, Kimmerer WJ (2001) Floodplain rearing of juvenile chinook salmon: evidence of enhanced growth and survival. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:325-333
64. Taylor EB (1990) Phenotypic correlates of life-history variation in juvenile Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. J Anim Ecol 59:455-468
65. Teel DJ, Milner GB, Winans GA, Grant WS (2000) Genetic population structure and origin of life history types in Chinook salmon in British Columbia, Canada. Trans Am Fish Soc 129:194-209
66. Tighe, T (2001) Clearwater fish hatchery annual report. Brood year 1999 Chinook and brood year 2000 Steelhead. Idaho Department of Fish and Game. Report # 01-23
67. Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535-538
68. Vasemagi A, Gross R, Paaver T, Koljonen ML, Saisa M, Nilsson J (2005) Analysis of gene associated tandem repeat markers in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) populations: implications for restoration and conservation in the Baltic Sea. Conserv Genet 6:385-397
69. Wang W, Ryman N (2001) Genetic effects of multiple generations of supportive breeding. Conserv Biol 15:1619-1631
70. Waples RS (1990) Conservation genetics of Pacific salmon. II. Effective population size and the rate of loss of genetic variability. J Hered 81:267-276
71. Waples RS, Teel DJ, Myers JM, Marshall AR (2004) Life-history divergence in Chinook salmon: historical contingency and parallel evolution. Evolution 58:386-403
72. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358-1370
73. Williamson KS, Cordes JF, May B (2002) Characterization of microsatellite loci in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and cross-species amplification in other salmonids. Mol Ecol Notes 2:17-19
74. Withler FC (1982) Transplanting Pacific salmon. Can Tech Rep Fish Aquat Sci 1079:1-27