Lack of evidence for allergenic properties of coumarin in a fragrance allergy mouse model

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 57, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 361-364

  Vocanson, Marc ^a,b   Valeyrie, Magalie ^a   Rozières, Aurore ^a,b   Hennino, Anca ^a,b   Floc'h, François ^c   Gard, Arielle ^c   Nicolas, Jean François ^a,b,d  

^a University Lyon i   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^c Rhodia Europe   (France)

^d CENTRE HOSPITALIER LYON SUD   (France)

Author keywords

Allergic contact dermatitis; Coumarin; Fragrance allergy; Mouse ear swelling test; Murine model; T cell priming

Indexed keywords

COUMARIN; DIHYDROCOUMARIN; FRAGRANCE; GAMMA INTERFERON; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALLERGENICITY; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CD4+ T LYMPHOCYTE; CELL ACTIVATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; SKIN ALLERGY; SKIN SENSITIZATION; T LYMPHOCYTE;

ANIMALS; ANTIGENS, CD4; COUMARINS; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; EAR; ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; INTERFERON TYPE II; LOCAL LYMPH NODE ASSAY; LYMPHOCYTE DEPLETION; MICE; MICE, INBRED BALB C; MICE, INBRED C57BL; PERFUME; T-LYMPHOCYTES;

EID: 35848947939     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: 16000536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01276.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Diepgen T L, Kanerva L. Occupational skin diseases. Eur J Dermatol 2006 : 16 : 324 330.
2. Williams H, Svensson A, Diepgen T, Naldi L, Coenraads P J, Elsner P, Grob J J, Bouwes Bavinck J N. Epidemiology of skin diseases in Europe. Eur J Dermatol 2006 : 16 : 212 218.
3. de Groot A C, Bruynzeel D P, Bos J D, van der Meeren H L, van Joost T, Jagtman B A, Weyland J W. The allergens in cosmetics. Arch Dermatol 1988 : 124 : 1525 1529.
4. Van Joost T, Stolz E, Van der Hoek J C. Simultaneous allergy to perfume ingredients. Contact Dermatitis 1985 : 12 : 115 116.
5. Kunkeler A C, Weijland J W, Bruynzeel D P. The role of coumarin in patch testing. Contact Dermatitis 1998 : 39 : 327 328.
6. Larsen W, Nakayama H, Lindberg M et al. Fragrance contact dermatitis: a worldwide multicenter investigation (Part I). Am J Contact Dermat 1996 : 7 : 77 83.
7. Malten K E, van Ketel W G, Nater J P, Liem D H. Reactions in selected patients to 22 fragrance materials. Contact Dermatitis 1984 : 11 : 1 10.
8. Frosch P J, Johansen J D, Menne T et al. Further important sensitizers in patients sensitive to fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 2002 : 47 : 78 85.
9. Hausen B M, Kallweit M. The sensitizing capacity of coumarins (II). Contact Dermatitis 1986 : 15 : 289 294.
10. Vocanson M, Goujon C, Chabeau G et al. The skin allergenic properties of chemicals may depend on contaminants - evidence from studies on coumarin. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2006 : 140 : 231 238.
11. Saint-Mezard P, Berard F, Dubois B, Kaiserlian D, Nicolas J F. The role of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in contact hypersensitivity and allergic contact dermatitis. Eur J Dermatol 2004 : 14 : 131 138.
12. Vocanson M, Hennino A, Cluzel-Tailhardat M et al. CD8+ T cells are effector cells of contact dermatitis to common skin allergens in mice. J Invest Dermatol 2006 : 126 : 815 820.
13. Basketter D A, Evans P, Fielder R J, Gerberick G F, Dearman R J, Kimber I. Local lymph node assay - validation, conduct and use in practice. Food Chem Toxicol 2002 : 40 : 593 598.
14. Cohen M H, Chretien P B, Felix E L et al. Augmentation of lymphocyte reactivity in guinea pigs, mice, monkeys and humans sensitised to BCG, dinitrochlorobenzene or nitrogen mustard. Nature 1974 : 249 : 656 658.