Is the future evidence-based?

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 129, Issue , 2007, Pages 875-879

  Sissons, Ben W I ^a   Gray, W Alex ^a   Bater, Tony ^b   Morrey, Dave ^b  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Velindre NHS Trust   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

clinical decision support systems; computerized medical records; evidence based medicine

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; HOSPITAL DATA PROCESSING; MEDICAL COMPUTING;

CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL RECORDS; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; INFORMATION SOURCES; MEDICAL COMMUNITY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PRACTICAL PROJECTS;

MEDICINE;

ARTICLE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EVALUATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FORECASTING; HUMAN; MEDICAL RECORD; NEOPLASM;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; EVALUATION STUDIES; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; NEOPLASMS;

EID: 35748962023     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Eysenbach G and Jadad A. Evidence-based patient choice and consumer health informatics in the Internet age. J Med Internet Res 2001: 3(2): p. e19.
2. Risk A and Dzenowagis J. Review of Internet Health Information Quality Initiatives. J Med Internet Res 2001: 3(4): p. e28.
3. Sastry S and Carroll P. Doctors, patients and the Internet: time to grasp the nettle. Clin Med 2002: 2(2): p. 131-133.
4. NHS Litigation Authority. NHS Litigation Authority, 2006. http://www. nhsla. com/, Accessed: 28/09/2006
5. National Audit Office. Handling clinical negligence claims in England. London: National Audit Office, 2001.
6. Changing Attitudes and the Response to clinical claims and Complaints. Clin Risk 2001: 7(2): p. 124-125.
7. Guyatt G. Evidence-Based Medicine-A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 1992: 268(17): p. 2420-2425.
8. Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation. Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, 2005. WWW: http://www. cebm. net, Accessed: 15/11/2006
9. Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Laupacis A, Sackett DL, and Goldberg RJ. Clinical recommendations using levels of evidence for antithrombotic agents. Chest 1995: 108(4): p. S227-S230.
10. Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, and Cook DJ. Users' guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1993: 270(21): p. 2598-601.
11. Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, and Cook DJ. Users' guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. B. What were the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994: 271(1): p. 59-63.
12. Vale C, Stewart L, and Tierney J. Trends in UK cancer trials: results from the UK Coordinating Committee for Cancer Research National Register of Cancer Trials. Br J Cancer 2005: 92(5): p. 811-4.
13. Elting LS, Cooksley C, Bekele BN, Frumovitz M, Avritscher EBC, Sun C, and Bodurka DC. Generalizability of cancer clinical trial results. Cancer 2006: 106(11): p. 2452-2458.
14. NHS Connecting for Health. The National Programme for IT Implementation Guide. London: DoH, 2005.
15. Welsh Assembly Government. Informing Healthcare: Transforming Healthcare Using Information and IT. Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government, 2003.
16. HealthConnect. HealthConnect: An overview. Canberra: HealthConnect, 2004.
17. The Cochrane Collaboration: The reliable source of evidence in health care. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2006. http://www. cochrane. org/, Accessed: 20/10/2006
18. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. A Guide to NICE. London: NICE, 2005.
19. Graf E, Schmoor C, Sauerbrei W, and Schumacher M. Assessment and comparison of prognostic classification schemes for survival data. Stat Med 1999: 18(17-18): p. 2529-45.
20. Cox D. Regression Models and Life Tables. J R Stat Soc 1972: Series B(34): p. 187-220.