Capturing conceptual implicit memory: The time it takes to produce an association

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1187-1196

  Hourihan, Kathleen L ^a   MacLeod, Colin M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; EXPLICIT MEMORY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMPLICIT MEMORY; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; NORMAL HUMAN; RECALL; SEMANTIC MEMORY; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 35748951617     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193592     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. BATTIG, W. F., & MONTAGUE, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 80, 1-45.
2. BENTIN, S., MOSCOVITCH, M., & NIRHOD, O. (1998). Levels of processing and selective attention effects on encoding in memory. Acta Psychologica, 98, 311-341.
3. BUTLER, L. T., & BERRY, D. C. (2001). Implicit memory: Intention and awareness revisited. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 192-197.
4. CRAIK, F. I. M., & LOCKHART, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
5. EBBINGHAUS, H. (1913). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College. (Original work published 1885)
6. GABRIELI, J. D. E., VAIDYA, C. J., STONE, M., FRANCIS, W. S., THOMPSON-SCHILL, S. L., FLEISCHMAN, D. A., ET AL. (1999). Convergent behavioral and neuropsychological evidence for a distinction between identification and production forms of repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 479-498.
7. HORTON, K. D., WILSON, D. E., & EVANS, M. (2001). Measuring automatic retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 958-966.
8. HORTON, K. D., WILSON, D. E., VONK, J., KIRBY, S. L., & NIELSEN, T. (2005). Measuring automatic retrieval: A comparison of implicit memory, process dissociation, and speeded response procedures. Acta Psychologica, 119, 235-263.
9. JACOBY, L. L. (1983). Remembering the data: Analyzing interactive processes in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22, 485-508.
10. JACOBY, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 513-541.
11. LIGHT, L. L., PRULL, M. W., & KENNISON, R. F. (2000). Divided attention, aging, and priming in exemplar generation and category verification. Memory & Cognition, 28, 856-872.
12. MACDONALD, P. A., & MACLEOD, C. M. (1998). The influence of attention at encoding on direct and indirect remembering. Acta Psychologica, 98, 291-310.
13. MACLEOD, C. M., & MASSON, M. E. J. (2000). Repetition priming in speeded word reading: Contributions of perceptual and conceptual processing episodes. Journal of Memory & Language, 42, 208-228.
14. MASSON, M. E. J., & MACLEOD, C. M. (1992). Re-enacting the route to interpretation: Enhanced perceptual identification without prior perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 145-176.
15. MASSON, M. E. J., & MACLEOD, C. M. (2002). Covert operations: Orthographic recoding as a basis for repetition priming in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 858-871.
16. MULLIGAN, N. W. (2002). The effects of generation on conceptual implicit memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 47, 327-342.
17. NELSON, D. L., & GOODMON, L. B. (2002). Experiencing a word can prime its accessibility and its associative connections to related words. Memory & Cognition, 30, 380-398.
18. NELSON, D. L., MCEVOY, C. L., & DENNIS, S. (2000). What is free association and what does it measure? Memory & Cognition, 28, 887-899.
19. ROEDIGER, H. L., III (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering. American Psychologist, 45, 1043-1056.
20. SCHACTER, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 501-518.
21. SCHMITTER-EDGECOMBE, M. (1999). Effects of divided attention on perceptual and conceptual memory tests: An analysis using a process-dissociation approach. Memory & Cognition, 27, 512-525.
22. SEAMON, J. G., MCKENNA, P. A., & BINDER, N. (1998). The mere exposure effect is differentially sensitive to different judgment tasks. Consciousness & Cognition, 7, 85-102.
23. SHIMAMURA, A. P. (1986). Priming effects in amnesia: Evidence for a dissociable memory function. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A, 619-644.
24. SLAMECKA, N. J., & GRAF, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 4, 592-604.
25. VAIDYA, C. J., GABRIELI, J. D. E., KEANE, M. M., MONTI, L. A., GUTIÉRREZ-RIVAS, H., & ZARELLA, M. M. (1997). Evidence for multiple mechanisms of conceptual priming on implicit memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 1324-1343.
26. VAN SELST, M., & JOLICœUR, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 631-650.
27. ZEELENBERG, R. (2005, November). Semantic flexibility effects in a speeded conceptual memory task. Poster presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Toronto.