Determination of suitable sample sizes for multi-patient based finite element studies

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 29, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 1065-1072

  Radcliffe, I A J ^a   Prescott, P ^a   Man, H S ^a   Taylor, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Finite element analysis; Multi femur analysis; Patient specific modelling

Indexed keywords

BONE; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; PATIENT MONITORING; STATISTICAL METHODS;

FEMURS; JOINT REPLACEMENTS; MULTI-FEMUR ANALYSIS; PATIENT SPECIFIC MODELLING;

JOINTS (ANATOMY);

ACCURACY; ADULT; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; FEMUR; FEMUR HEAD; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMPLANT; MATERIALS TESTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLE SIZE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP;

BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RESEARCH DESIGN; SAMPLE SIZE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 35748949231     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2006.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Prendergast P. Finite element models in tissue mechanics and orthopaedic implant design. Clin Biomech 12 6 (1997) 343-366
2. Markolf K., and Amstutz H.C. Mechanical strength of the femur following resurfacing and conventional total hip replacement procedures. Clin Orthopaed Relat Res 147 (1980) 170-180
3. Pancanti A., Bernakiewicz M., and Viceconti M. The primary stability of a cementless stem varies between subjects as much as between activities. J Biomech 36 6 (2003) 777-785
4. Wong A.S., et al. Effect of bone material properties on the initial stability of a cementless hip stem: a finite element study. Proc IMechE J Eng Med 219 H (2005) 265-275
5. Zannoni C., Mantovani R., and Viceconti M. Material properties assignment to finite element models of bone structures: a new method. Med Eng Phys 20 (1998) 735-740
6. Lengsfeld M., et al. Femoral strain changes after total hip arthroplasty-patient specific finite element analyses 12 years after operation. Med Eng Phys 27 (2005) 649-654
7. Browne M., Langler R., and Gregson P. Reliability theory for load bearing biomedical implants. Biomaterials 20 (1999) 1285-1292
8. Heller M., et al. Musculo-skeletal loading conditions at the hip during walking and stair climbing. J Biomech 34 (2001) 883-893
9. Huiskes R., et al. Interface stresses in the resurfaced hip-finite-element analysis of load transmission in the femoral-head. Acta Orthopaed Scand 56 6 (1985) 474-478
10. Taylor M. Finite element analysis of the resurfaced femoral head. Proc IMechE 220 H (2006) 289-297
11. Amstutz H., et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg 86-A 1 (2004) 28-39
12. Taddei F., Pancanti A., and Viceconti M. An improved method for the automatic mapping of computed tomography numbers onto finite element models. Med Eng Phys 26 (2004) 61-69
13. Morgan E.F., Bayraktar H.H., and Keaveny T.M. Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. J Biomech 36 (2003) 897-904
14. Bergmann G., et al. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 34 (2001) 859-871
15. Bergmann G., Graichen F., and Rohlmann A. Hip joint contact forces during stumbling. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389 (2004) 53-59
16. Bergmann G., Graichen F., and Rohlmann A. Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. J Biomech 26 8 (1993) 969-990
17. Bergmann G., et al. Hip joint forces during load carrying. Clin Orthopaed Rel Res 335 (1997) 190-201
18. Chang W.C., et al. Uniaxial yield strains for bovine trabecular bone are isotropic and asymmetric. J Orthop Res 17 4 (1999) 582-585
19. Morgan E.F., and Keaveny T.M. Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site. J Biomech 34 (2001) 569-577
20. Julious S.A. Tutorial in biostatistics: sample sizes for clinical trials with normal data. Statist Med 23 (2004) 1921-1986
21. Watanabe Y., et al. Biomechanical study of the resurfacing hip arthroplasty-finite element analysis of the femoral component. J Arthrop 15 4 (2000) 505-511
22. Keyak J.H., and Falkinstein Y. Comparison of in situ and in vitro CT scan-based finite element model predictions of proximal femoral fracture load. Med Eng Phys 25 (2003) 781-787