MR atlas for articular cartilage morphology: Potential to detect shape differences

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 129, Issue , 2007, Pages 1329-1333

  Tameem, Hussain Z ^a   Sinha, Usha S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

active shape models; articular cartilage; image registration; magnetic resonance imaging; morphometry

Indexed keywords

IMAGE REGISTRATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ACTIVE SHAPE MODELS; ARTICULAR CARTILAGES; FREEFORMS; MORPHOLOGICAL CHANGES; MORPHOMETRY; MR IMAGES; SHAPE DIFFERENCE;

CARTILAGE;

ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MODELS, ANATOMIC;

EID: 35748946051     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Aubray JH, Jr, Sokoloff L 1989 Pathology of osteoarthritis. In: McCarty DJ (ed. ) Arthritis and Allied Conditions, 11th Ed. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, PA, USA., pp. 1571-1580
2. Dunlop DD, Manheim LM, Yelin EH, Song J, Chang RW. The cost of arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 49(1):101-13
3. Guccione AA, Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Anthony JM, Zhang Y, Wilson PW, Kelly-Hayes M, Wolf PA, Kreger BE, Kannel WB. The effects of specific medical conditions on the functional limitations of elders in the Framingham study. Am J Public Health 1994;84:351-8
4. Lawrence RC, Helmick CJ, Arnett FC, Deyo RA, Felson DT, Giannini EH. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the United States. Arthritis Rheum 1998; 41:778-99
5. Bagge E, Bjelle E, Valkenburg HA, Svanborg A. Prevalence of radiographic osteoarthritis in two elderly european populations. Rheumatol Int. 1992;12:33-8
6. Van Sasse JLCM, Van Romunde LKJ, Cats A, Vandenbroucke JP, Valkenburg HA. Epidimealogy of ostearthritis: Zoetermeer survey. Comparison of radiological osteoarthritis in a Dutch population with that in 10 other population. Ann Rheum Dis 1989;48:271-80
7. Urwin M, Symmons D, Allison T, Brammah T, Busby H, Roxby M, Simmons A, Williams G. Estimating the burden of musculoskeletal disorders in the community: the comparative prevalence of symptoms at different anatomical sites, and the relation to social deprivation. Annals of Rheumatic Diseases 1998; 57:649-55
8. Peat G, McCarney R, Croft P. Knee pain and Osteoarthritis in older adults: a review of community burden and current use of primary health care. Annals of Rheumatic Diseases 2001; 60:91-7
9. Felson DT, Zhang Y. An update on Epidemiology of knee and hip osteoarthritis with a view to prevention. Arthritis Rheum 1998;41(8):1343-55
10. Felson DT, Lawrence RC, Hochberg MC, McAlindon T, Dieppe PA, Minor MA, Blair SN, Berman BM, Fries JF, Weinberger M, Lorig KR, Jacobs JJ, Goldberg V. Osteoarthritis: New Insights. Part 2: Treatment Approaches. Ann Internal Med 2000; 133(9): 726-37
11. Cicuttini F, Forbes A, Morris K, Darling S, Bailey M, Stcukey S. Gender differences in knee joint cartilage volume as measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1999; 7:265-71
12. Ding C, Cicuttini F Scott F, Glisson M, Jones G. Sex differences in knee cartilage volume in adults: role of body and bone size, age and physical activity. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003
13. Cicuttini FM, Teichtahl AJ, Wluka AE, Davis S, Strauss BJ, Ebeling PR. The relationship between body composition and knee cartilage volume in middle-aged subjects. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:461-7
14. Jones G, Ding C, Scot F, Cicuttini F. Genetic Mechanism of knee osteoarthritis: a population based case-control study. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63:1255-9
15. Marcus L. Traditional Morphometrics In: Rohlf FJ, Bookstein FL, editors. Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop, The University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor, 1990. p. 77-122
16. Cootes T, Hill A, Taylor CJ, Haslam J. Use of active shape models for locating structures in medical images. Image Vision Comput 1994; 12548:126-32
17. Le Briquer L, Gee JC. Design of a statistical model of brain shape. Lect Notes Comput Sci 1997; 1230:477-82
18. Duchesne S, Pruessner JC, Collins DL. Appearance-based segmentation of medial temporal lobe structures. NeuroImage; 2002,17:515-532
19. Thirion JP. Image Matching as a diffusion process: An analogy with Maxwell's demons. Medical Image Analysis, 1998; Vol 2 (3), 243-260
20. Kim SH, Lee JM, Kim HP, Jang DP, Shin YW, Ha TH, Kim JJ, Kim IY, Kwon JS, Kim SI. Asymmetry analysis of deformable hippocampal model using the principal component in schizophrenia. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 Aug; 25(4):361-9
21. Shenton ME, Gerig G, McCarley RW, Szekely G, Kikinis R. Amygdalahippocampal shape difference in schizophrenia: the application of 3D shape models to volumetric MR data. Pyschiatry res. 2002 Aug 20; 115(1-2):15-35