Appearance-based segmentation of medial temporal lobe structures

NeuroImage

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 515-531

  Duchesne, S ^a   Pruessner, J C ^a   Collins, D L ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMYGDALOID NUCLEUS; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BRAIN ATROPHY; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN SLICE; HIPPOCAMPUS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MODEL; MORPHOMETRICS; NEUROANATOMY; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEMPORAL LOBE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0036420188     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1053-8119(02)91188-2     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Baker, S., and Matthews, I. 2001. Equivalence and efficiency of image alignment algorithms. In Proceedings of the 2001 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1090-1097.
2. Beyrouti, F. 1999. An Improved Appearance-Based Approach to Image Retrieval and Classification. Master's thesis, McGill University.
3. Christensen, G., Joshi, S., and Miller. M. 1997. Volumetric transformation of brain anatomy. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 16: 864-877.
4. Clarke, L., Velthuizen, R., Camacho, M., Heine, J., Vaidyanathan, M., Hall, L., Thatcher, R., and Silbiger. M. 1995. MRI segmentation: Methods and applications. Magn. Reson. Imaging 13: 343-368.
5. Cohen, J. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20: 37-46, 1960.
6. Collins, D., and Evans, A. 1997. ANIMAL: Validation and applications of non-linear registration based segmentation. Int. J. Pattern Recog. Artificial Intelligence 11: 1271-1294.
7. Collins, D., Holmes, C., Peters, T., and Evans, A., 1995. Automatic 3D model-based neuroanatomical segmentation. Hum. Brain Mapping 3: 190-208.
8. Collins, D., Neelin, P., Peters, T., and Evans, A. 1994. Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach Space. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 18: 192-205.
9. Collins, D., Zijdenbos, A., Kollokian, V., Sled, J., Kabani, N., Holmes, C., and Evans, A. 1998. Design and construction of a realistic digital brain phantom. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 17: 463-468.
10. Cootes, T., and Taylor, C. 2000. Statistical Models of Appearance for Computer Vision. Technical report, University of Manchester.
11. Cootes, T., Edwards, G., and Taylor, C. 1998. Active appearance models. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 484-498. ECCV Springer-Verlag Berlin/New York.
12. Cootes, T., Taylor, C., Cooper, D., and Graham, J. 1995. Active shape models, their training and application. Comput. Vision Image Understanding 61: 38-59.
13. Cootes, T., Taylor, C., Lanitis, A., Cooper, D., and Graham, J. 1993. Building and using flexible models incorporating grey-Level information. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 242-246.IEEE Computer Soc. Press.
14. Csernansky, J., Joshi, S., Wang, L., Haller, J., Gado, M., Miller, J., Grenander, U., and Miller, M. 1998. Hippocampal morphometry in schizophrenia by high dimensional brain mapping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 11406-11411.
15. Csernansky, J., Wang, L., Joshi, S., Miller, J., Gado, M., Kido, D., McKeel, D., Morris, J., and Miller, M. 2000. Early DAT is distinguished from aging by high-dimensional mapping of the hippocampus. Neurology 55: 1636-1643.
16. Dice, L. 1945. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology.
17. Duchesne, S., and Collins, D. 2001. Analysis of 3D deformation fields for appearance-based segmentation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention.
18. Duchesne, S., Pruessner, J., and Collins, D. 2001. Appearance-based modelling and segmentation of the hippocampus from MR images. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.
19. Haller, J., Christensen, G., Joshi, S., Newcomer, J., Miller, M., Csernansky, J., and Vannier, M. 1996. Hippocampal MR imaging morphometry by means of general pattern matching. Radiology 199: 787-791.
20. Hogan, R., Mark, K., Wang, L., Joshi, S., Miller, M., and Bucholz, R. 2000. Mesial temporal sclerosis and temporal lobe epilepsy: MR imaging deformation-based segmentation of the hippocampus in five patients. Radiology.
21. Jones, M., and Poggio, T. 1998. Multidimensional morphable models. In Proceedings of the 1998 International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 683-688.
22. Joshi, S., Pizer, S., Fletcher, P., Thall, A., and Tracton, G. 2001. Multi-scale 3D deformable model segmentation based on medial description. In Proceedings of the Information Processing in Medical Imaging Conference, pp. 64-77. IPMI, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/New York.
23. Kelemen, A., Szekely, G., and Gerig, G. 1999. Elastic model-based segmentation of 3D neuroradiological data sets. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging.
24. Mazziotta, J., Toga, A., Evans, A., Fox, P., and Lancaster, J. 1995. A probabilistic atlas of the human brain: Theory and rationale for its development. NeuroImage 2: 89-101.
25. Pham, D., Xu, C., and Prince, J. 2000. Current methods in medical image segmentation. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 2: 315-337.
26. Pizer, S., Fletcher, P., Fridman, Y., Fritsch, D., Gash, A., Glotzer, J., Joshi, S., Thall, A., Tracton, G., Yushkevich, P., and Chaney, E. 2001. Deformable M-Reps for 3D medical image segmentation. Med. Image Anal.
27. Pruessner, J., Collins, D., Pruessner, M., and Evans, A. 2001. Age and gender predict volume decline in the anterior and posterior hippocampus in early adulthood. J. Neurosci. 21: 194-200.
28. Pruessner, J., Li, L., Serles, W., Pruessner, M., Collins, D., Kabani, N., Lupien, S., and Evans, A. 2000. Volumetry of hippocampus and amygdala with high-resolution MRI and three-dimensional analysis software: Minimizing the discrepancies between laboratories. Cereb. Cortex 10: 433-442.
29. Rueckert, D., Frangi, A., and Schnabel, J. 2001. Automatic construction of 3D statistical deformation models using non-rigid registration. In Proceedings of the 2001 Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp. 77-84.
30. Sled, J., Zijdenbos, A., and Evans, A. 1998. A nonparametric method of automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in mri data. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 17: 87-97.
31. Styner, M., and Gerig, G. 2001. Medial models incorporating object variability for 3D shape analysis. In Proceedings of the Information Processing in Medical Imaging Conference, pp. 502-516. IPMI, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/New York.
32. Thirion, J. 1996. Non-rigid matching using demons. In Proceedings of the 1996 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 245-251. CVPR.
33. Webb, J., Guimond, A., Elderidge, P., Chadwick, D., Meunier, J., Thirion, J.-P., and Roberts, N. 1999. Automatic detection of hippocampal atrophy on magnetic resonance images. Magn. Reson. Imaging 17: 1149-1161.
34. Zijdenbos, A., Dawant, B., Margolin, R., and Palmer, A. 1994. Morphometric analysis of white matter lesions in MR images: Method and validation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 13: 716-724.