Politics and the erosion of federal scientific capacity: Restoring scientific integrity to public health science

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 97, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 1939-1944

  Rest, Kathleen M ^a   Halpern, Michael H ^a,b  

^a UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS   (United States)

^b Scientific Integrity Program   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; EROSION; FUNDING; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH SURVEY; HISTORY OF MEDICINE; INTERVENTION STUDY; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NOTE; PHYSICAL DISEASE; POLITICAL SYSTEM; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; SCIENTIST; ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLIMATE; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MERCURIALISM; POLICY; POLITICS; PUBLIC HEALTH; SCIENCE; STANDARD; TRUST; UNITED STATES;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ANIMALS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CLIMATE; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; MERCURY POISONING; POLICY MAKING; POLITICS; PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLIC POLICY; SCIENCE; TRUST; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AGENCIES;

EID: 35748942015     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: 15410048     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.118455     Document Type: Note

References (73)

1. Bush GHW. Remarks to the National Academy of Sciences. April 23, 1990. Available at: http://bushlibrary.tamu.edu/research/papers/1990/90042301.html. Accessed May 7, 2007.
2. Jasanoff S. Transparency in public science: purposes, reasons, limits. Law Contemp Prob. 2006;69:21-45.
3. Branscomb L. Science, politics, and US democracy. Issues Sci Technol. 2004;21:53-59.
4. Mooney C. The Republican War on Science. New York, NY: Basic Books; 2005.
5. Shulman S. Undermining Science: Suppression and Distortion in the Bush Administration. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2007.
6. Scientific Integrity in Policy Making: An Investigation into the Bush Administration's Misuse of Science. Cambridge, Mass: Union of Concerned Scientists; 2004.
7. Scientific Integrity in Policy Making: Further Investigation Into the Bush Administration's Misuse of Science. Cambridge, Mass: Union of Concerned Scientists; 2004. Available at: http://www.ucsusa.org/scientific_integrity/ interference/reports-scientific-integrityin-policy-making.html. Accessed May 7, 2007.
8. US House of Representatives Committee on Government Reform, Minority Staff Special Investigations Division. Politics and Science in the Bush Administration. Available at: http://oversight.house.gov/features/ politics_and_science/pdfs/pdf_politics_and_science_rep.pdf. Accessed May 7, 2007.
9. Revkin AC. Politics reasserts itself in the debate over climate change and its hazards. New York Times. August 5, 2003:F2.
10. Revkin AC, Seelye KQ. Report by the EPA leaves out data on climate change. New York Times. June 19, 2003:A1.
11. Revkin AC. Bush aide edited climate reports. New York Times. June 8, 2005:A1.
12. Hamburger T. White House tries to rein in scientists. Los Angeles Times. June 26, 2004:A1.
13. Barringer F. Interior aide and biologists clashed over protecting bird. New York Times. December 5, 2004;A38.
14. Markowitz G, Rosner D. Politicizing science: the case of the Bush administration's influence on the lead advisory panel at the Centers for Disease Control. J Public Health Policy. 2003;24:105-129.
15. Additional Analyses of Mercury Emissions Needed Before EPA Finalizes Rules for Coal-Fired Electric Utilities. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency; 2005. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/oig/reports/2005/ 20050203-2005-P-00003.pdf. Accessed August 20, 2007.
16. Clymer A. U.S. revises sex information, and a fight goes on. New York Times. December 27, 2002:A17.
17. Shogren E. Federal coal-mining policy comes under fire: Fish and Wildlife Service says the administration ignored its protection plan. Los Angeles Times. January 7, 2004:A13.
18. Warrick J. Appalachia is paying price for White House rule change. Washington Post. August 17, 2004:A1.
19. US Environmental Protection Agency. White House edits to climate change section of EPA's report on the environment. April 26, 2003. Reprinted in: Scientific Integrity in Policy Making: Further Investigation Into the Bush Administration's Misuse of Science. Cambridge, Mass: Union of Concerned Scientists; 2004:34-38. Available at: http://www.ucsusa.org/ scientific_integrity/interference/reports-scientificintegrity-in-policy-making. html. Accessed May 7, 2007.
20. Revkin AC. Former Bush aide who edited climate reports is hired by Exxon. New York Times. June 15, 2005:A21.
21. Smoke, Mirrors & Hot Air: How Exxon Mobil Uses Big Tobacco's Tactics to "Manufacture Uncertainty" on Climate Change. Cambridge, Mass: Union of Concerned Scientists; 2007.
22. Fialka JJ. Mercury threat to kids rising, unreleased EPA report warns. Wall Street Journal. February 20, 2003:A1.
23. Clean Air Act: Observations on EPA's Cost-Benefit Analysis of Its Mercury Control Options. Washington, DC: US Government Accountability Office. Available at: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05252.pdf. Accessed August 20, 2007.
24. US Environmental Protection Agency. Standards of performance for new and existing stationary sources: electric utility steam generating units. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/air/mercuryrule/pdfs/camr_final_preamble.pdf. Accessed May 7, 2007.
25. National medical healthcare and public health groups take challenge of clean air mercury rules to higher court [press release]. Washington, DC; American Public Health Association. Available at: http://www.apha.org/about/ news/pressreleases/2007/ National+Medical+Healthcare+and+Public+Health+Groups+Take+Challenge+of+Clean+ Air+Mercury+Rules+to+Hi.htm. Accessed May 7, 2007.
26. US Environmental Protection Agency. Reconsideration of the Clean Air Mercury Rule. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/air/mercuryrule/fs20060531.html. Accessed August 24, 2007.
27. Revkin AC. Climate expert says NASA tried to silence him. New York Times. January 29, 2006;A1.
28. Donaghy T, Freeman J, Grifo F, Kaufman K, Maassarani T, Shultz L. Atmosphere of Pressure. Cambridge, Mass: Union of Concerned Scientists; 2007.
29. Revkin AC. Memos tell officials how to discuss climate. New York Times. March 8, 2007:A17.
30. Young A. Overseas CDC jobs go unfilled. Atlanta Journal-Constitution. April 26, 2007:A1.
31. American Sociological Association. Statement of the American Sociological Association on the U.S. government vetting of scientists to serve on international advisory bodies. Available at: http://www.asanet.org/page.ww?name= Government%20Vetting%20of%20Scientists§ion=Issue%20 Statements. Accessed April 29, 2007.
32. US Environmental Protection Agency. EPA FY 2007 Library Plan: National Framework for the Headquarters and Regional Libraries. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/natlibra/Library_Plan_National_Framework081506final.pdf. Accessed May 7, 2007.
33. Schulte B. EPA library shutdown may lead to showdown. U.S. News and World Report. December 19, 2006. Available at: http://www.usnews.com/usnews/ news/articles/061218/18epa.htm. Accessed August 20, 2007.
34. American Library Association. EPA library closures continue despite protests. American Libraries Online. September 16, 2006. Available at: http://www.ala.org/ala/alonline/currentnews/newsarchive/2006abc/september2006a/ epaclosings.cfm. Accessed April 29, 2007.
35. Lee C. Budget cut would shutter EPA libraries. Washington Post. May 15, 2006:A15.
36. Skinner T. Region 5 Library. E-mail message to Region 5 employees. March 13, 2006. Available at: http://www.peer.org/docs/epa/06_13_03_EPA_Library_email. pdf. Accessed May 7, 2007.
37. Sternstein A. House Dems urge GAO to assess EPA library cuts. FCW.com. September 25, 2006. Available at: http://www.fcw.com/ article96218-09-25-06-Web. Accessed May 7, 2007.
38. Schmitt CH, Pound ET. Keeping secrets: the Bush administration is doing the public's business out of the public eye. U.S. News and World Report. December 22, 2003. Available at: http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/ secrecy/22secrecy.htm. Accessed May 7, 2007.
39. Hearings Before the Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats and International Relations of the House Committee on Government Reform, 108th Cong, 2nd Sess (2004). Available at: http://www.fas.org/sgp/congress/2004/ 082404transcript.html. Accessed May 7, 2007.
40. OMB Watch. Bush administration suppressing documents in classification frenzy. Available at: http://www.ombwatch.org/article/articleview/2099/1/210/. Accessed May 7, 2007.
41. OMB Watch. Against the Public's Will. Available at: http://www.ombwatch.org/info/TRICommentsReport.pdf. Accessed May 7, 2007.
42. Gibb S. NIEHS faces opposition to journal privatization plan. Available at: http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/journals/esthag-w/2006/apr/business/sg_niehs. html. Accessed August 20, 2007.
43. National Aeronautics and Space Administration and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Impacts of NPOESS Nunn-McCurdy Certification on Joint NASA-NOAA Climate Goals. Available at: http://www.climatesciencewatch. org/file-uploads/NPOESS-OSTPdec-06.pdf. Accessed May 7, 2007.
44. Jasanoff S. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1990.
45. Ashford NA. Advisory committees in OSHA and EPA: their use in regulatory decision-making. Science Technol Hum Values. 1984;9:72-82.
46. US House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Lead Poisoning Advisory Committee. Available at: http://oversight.house.gov/ features/politics_and_science/example_lead_poisoning.htm. Accessed 27 April 2007.
47. Blackburn E. Bioethics and the political distortion of biomedical science. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1379-1380.
48. Howard WE III. Advice without dissent at the DOD. Science. 2002;298:1334-1335.
49. Benson E. Political science: allegations of politicization are threatening the credibility of the federal government's scientific advisory committees. Monitor Psychol: J Am Psychological Assoc. 2003;34:20.
50. Dawson J. Disbanding NNSA advisory panel raises concerns. Physics Today. September 2003:33-34.
51. US Food and Drug Administration. Transcript of the December 16, 2003 meeting of the FDA Nonprescription Drugs Advisory Committee in joint session with the Advisory Committee for Reproductive Health Drugs. December 16, 2003. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/03/transcripts/4015T1.DOC. Accessed May 7, 2007.
52. Kaufman M. Decision on Plan B called very unusual. Washington Post. October 13, 2005:A9.
53. Drazen JM, Greene MF, Wood AJ. The FDA, politics, and Plan B. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1561-1562.
54. Harris G. Morning-after-pill ruling defies norm. New York Times. May 8, 2004;A13.
55. Stolberg SG. Democrats block nomination over morning-after pill. New York Times. April 7, 2005;A19.
56. Rubin R. FDA approves over-the-counter sales of Plan B: those under 18 will need prescription for "morning after" contraceptive pills. USA Today. August 25, 2006:A2.
57. Henderson R, Poirot RL, Cowling E, et al. Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee recommendations concerning the final national ambient air quality standards for particulate matter. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/sab/pdf/ casac-ltr-06-003.pdf. Accessed May 7, 2007.
58. Wilson J. EPA panel advises agency chief to think again. Los Angeles Times. February 4, 2006:B1.
59. White House Executive Order 13422. January 18, 2007. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/01/20070118.html. Accessed August 20, 2007.
60. OMB Watch. A Failure to Govern: Bush's Attack on the Regulatory Process. Available at: http://www.ombwatch.org/article/articleview/3774. Accessed May 7, 2007.
61. Simoncelli T, Stanley J. Science Under Siege: The Bush Administration's Assault on Academic Freedom and Scientific Inquiry. New York, NY: American Civil Liberties Union; 2005.
62. Political Science: A Report on Science and Censorship. New York, NY: National Coalition Against Censorship; 2007.
63. Maassarani T. Redacting the Science of Climate Change. Washington, DC: Government Accountability Project; 2007.
64. US House of Representatives Committee on Government Reform, Minority Staff Special Investigations Division. Federally Funded Abstinence-Only Programs Teach False and Misleading Information. Available at: http://oversight.house.gov/documents/20041201102153-50247.pdf. Accessed August 20, 2007.
65. Union of Concerned Scientists. FDA scientists pressured to exclude, alter findings; scientists fear retaliation for voicing safety concerns. Available at: http://www.ucsusa.org/news/press_release/fda-scientists-pressured.html. Accessed August 26, 2007.
66. Pub L No. 109-149, 119 Stat 2834.
67. National Academy of Sciences. Science and Technology in the National Interest: Ensuring the Best Presidential and Federal Advisory Committee Science and Technology Appointments. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2005.
68. Allegations of Political Interference with the Work of Government Climate Change Scientists: Hearings Before the US House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, 110th Cong, 1st Sess (2007).
69. Climate Change Research and Scientific Integrity: Hearings Before the US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, 110th Cong,1st Sess (2007).
70. Amending Executive Order 12866: Good Governance or Regulatory Usurpation? Hearings Before the US House Committee on Science and Technology, Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight, 110th Cong, 1st Sess (2007).
71. Political Interference with Science: Global Warming, Part II: Hearings Before the US House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, 110th Cong, 1st Sess (2007).
72. Endangered Species Act Implementation: Science or Politics? Hearings Before the US House Committee on Natural Resources, 110th Cong, 1st Sess (2007).
73. Union of Concerned Scientists. Restoring scientific integrity in policymaking. Available at: http://www.ucsusa.org/rsi_statement. Accessed August 20, 2007.