Using Q methodology to develop more perceptive insights on transport and social inclusion

Transport Policy

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 467-477

  Rajé, Fiona ^a  

^a NORTHUMBRIA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METHODOLOGY; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PERCEPTION; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING;

EID: 35649023827     PISSN: 0967070X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Addams H., and Proops J. Social Discourse and Environmental Policy: An Application Of Q Methodology (2000), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
2. Anable J. 'Complacent Car Addicts' or 'Aspiring Environmentalists'? Identifying travel behaviour segments using attitude theory'. Transport Policy 12 1 (2005) 65-78
3. Barry J., and Proops J. Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology. Ecological Economics 28 (1999) 337-345
4. Becker H.S. Tricks of the Trade: How to Think About Your Research While You're Doing it (1998), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
5. Brouwer M. Q is accounting for tastes. Journal of Advertising Research 39 2 (1999) 35-39
6. Brown S.R. Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science (1980), Yale University Press, Yale
7. Brown S.R. Q methodology and qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research 6 4 (1996) 561-567
8. Church A., Frost M., and Sullivan K. Transport and social exclusion in London. Transport Policy 7 (2000) 195-205
9. Dryzek J. Handle With Care: The Deadly Hermeneutics of Deliberative Instrumentation. Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Politics (2004), European University Institute, Firenze
10. Dudleston A., Stradling S., and Anable J. Public Perceptions of Travel Awareness-Phase 3. Development Department Research Programme (2005), Scottish Executive, Edinburgh
11. Farrington J., and Farrington C. Rural accessibility, social inclusion and social justice: towards conceptualisation. Journal of Transport Geography 13 (2005) 1-12
12. Hamilton K., Ryley Hoyle S., and Jenkins L. The Public Transport Gender Audit: The Research Report (1999), Transport Studies, University of East London, London
13. Jones P. Urban road pricing: public acceptability and barriers to implementation. In: Button K.J., and Verhoef E. (Eds). Road Pricing, Traffic Congestion and the Environment-Issues of Efficiency and Social Feasibility (1998), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
14. Rajé, F., Grieco, M., Hine, J., Preston, J., 2003. Impacts of Road User Charging/Workplace Parking Levy on Social Inclusion/Exclusion: Gender, Ethnicity and Lifecycle Issues-Final Report. DfT, Transport Studies Unit University of Oxford, London.
15. Steelman T.A., and Maguire L.A. Understanding participant perspectives: Q-methodology in national forest management. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 18 3 (1999) 361-388
16. Steg L., Vlek C., and Slotegraaf G. Instrumental-reasoned and symbolic-affective motives for using a motor car. Transportation Research Part F 4 (2001) 151-169
17. Valenta A.L., and Wigger U. Q-methodology: definition and application in health care informatics. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 4 6 (1997) 501-510
18. van Eeten M. Recasting environmental controversies: a Q study of the expansion of Amsterdam Airport. In: Addams H., and Proops J. (Eds). Social Discourse and Environmental Policy (2000), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 41-70
19. van Exel, J., 2003. Inert or reasoned? An investigation of medium-distance travel decision making strategies using Q methodology. In: 19th Annual Q Conference, Kent State University, Ohio.
20. Watts S., and Stenner P. Doing Q methodology: theory, method & interpretation. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2 1 (2005) 67-91