Logistics land use and the city: A spatial-temporal modeling approach

Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 277-297

  Woudsma, Clarence ^a   Jensen, John F ^b   Kanaroglou, Pavlos ^c   Maoh, Hanna ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^c MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Accessibility; Congestion; Land use; Logistics; Spatial regression

Indexed keywords

MOTOR TRANSPORTATION; TRAVEL TIME;

ACCESSIBILITY; AUTOREGRESSIVE MODELLING; CONGESTION; MODELING APPROACH; SPATIAL REGRESSION; SPATIAL TEMPORAL MODEL; SPATIAL TEMPORALS; SYSTEMS PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL APPROACH; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM;

LAND USE;

ACCESSIBILITY; LAND USE PLANNING; LOGISTICS; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; TRAFFIC CONGESTION; TRAVEL TIME; URBAN AREA; VECTOR AUTOREGRESSION;

EID: 35649004808     PISSN: 13665545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2007.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Abraham, J., Hunt, J., 1999. Firm location in the MEPLAN Model of Sacramento. In: Proceedings of the 79th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
2. Alonso W. Location and Land Use (1964), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
3. Anselin L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models (1988), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
4. Anselin, L., 1992. SpaceStat tutorial. Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
5. Anselin L. Local indicators of spatial association - LISA. Geographical Analysis 27 (1995) 93-115
6. Anselin, L., 1995b. SpaceStat version 1.80 user's guide. Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
7. Anselin L. The Moran scatterplot as an ESDA tool to assess local instability in spatial association. In: Fischer M., Scholten H.J., and Unwin D. (Eds). Spatial Analytical Perspectives on GIS: GIS Data IV (1996), Taylor & Francis, London 111-125
8. Anselin L. Exploratory spatial data analysis in a geocomputational environment. In: Longley P.A., Brooks S.M., McDonnell R., and Macmillan B. (Eds). Geocomputation: A Primer (1998), John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
9. Anselin, L., 2001. SpaceStat, a software program for the analysis of spatial data, version 1.91. Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
10. Anselin L. Under the hood: issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models. Agricultural Economics 17 3 (2002) 267-347
11. Badoe D.A., and Miller E.J. Transportation-land-use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and implications for modeling. Transportation Research D 5 4 (2000) 235-263
12. Baller R.D., Anselin L., Messner S.F., Deane G., and Hawdins D.F. Structural covariates of US county homicide rates: incorporating spatial effects. Criminology 39 3 (2001) 561-590
13. Baxter R.S., and Lenzi G. The measurement of relative accessibility. Regional Studies 9 (1975) 15-26
14. Boarnet, M.G., 1996. The direct and indirect economic effects of transportation infrastructure. The University of California Transportation Center, University of California at Berkeley, Working Paper UCTC No. 340, pp. 1-26.
15. Bourne L.S. Urban spatial structure: an introductory essay on concepts and criteria. In: Bourne L.S. (Ed). Internal Structure of the City: Readings on Urban Form, Growth, and Policy. second ed. (1982), Oxford University Press, New York 28-45
16. Bowes D.R. Identifying the impacts of rail transit stations on residential property values. Journal of Urban Economics 50 (2001) 1-25
17. Brandeau M.L., and Chiu S.S. An overview of representative problems in location research. Management Science 35 (1989) 645-674
18. Cambridge Systematics Inc. Freight Impacts on Ohio's Roadway System (2002), Cambridge Systematics Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts
19. Chang J.S. Models of the relationship between transport and land-use: a review. Transport Reviews 26 3 (2006) 325-350
20. Committee for Study of Impacts of Highway Capacity Improvements on Air Quality and Energy Consumption, 1995. Expanding metropolitan highways: implications for air quality and energy use. Transportation Research Board Special Report 245. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
21. Davis, J.S., 1999. Land use impacts of transportation: a guidebook. NCHRP Report 423A. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
22. de la Barra T. Integrated land use and transport modelling: decision chains and hierarchies. Cambridge Urban and Architectural Series vol. 12 (1989), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
23. Ellison G., and Glaeser E.L. Geographic concentration in US manufacturing industries: a dartboard approach. The Journal of Political Economy 105 5 (1997) 889
24. Fotheringham A.S., Brunsdon C., and Charlton M. Quantitative Geography: Perspectives on Spatial Data Analysis (2000), Sage Publications, London
25. Griffith D.A., and Amrhein C.G. Multivariate Statistical Analysis for Geographers (1997), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
26. Haider M., and Miller E.J. Effects of transportation infrastructure and location on residential land values: application of spatial-autoregressive techniques. Transportation Research Record 1722 (2000) 1-8
27. Haining R.P. Spatial Data Analysis in the Social and Environmental Sciences (1990), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England
28. Handy S. Regional versus local accessibility: implications for nonwork travel. Transportation Research Record 1400 (1993) 58-66
29. Handy S.L., and Niemeier D.A. Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Planning A 29 (1997) 1175-1194
30. Helling A. Changing intrametropolitan accessibility in the US: evidence from Atlanta. Progress in Planning 49 (1998) 55-108
31. Hesse M., and Rodrique J. The transport geography of logistics and freight distribution. The Journal of Transport Geography 12 3 (2004) 171-184
32. Hickey C. Location, location, location - transportation looms large when choosing a warehouse or distribution site. Traffic World 267 17 (2003) 22
33. Hirschman I., and Henderson M. Methodology for assessing local land use impacts of highways. Transportation Research Record (1990) 1274
34. Huff D.L. Defining and estimating a trading area. Journal of Marketing 28 (1964) 34-38
35. Jensen, J.N.F., 2004. Urban development and transportation: a spatial-temporal analysis, M.Sc. thesis, University of Calgary Library, Calgary, Alberta. ISBN: 0612936058.
36. Kawamura K. Empirical examination of relationship between firm location and transport facilities. Transportation Research Record 1747 (2001) 97-103
37. Kelejian H., and Robinson D.P. Spatial autocorrelation: a new computationally simple test with an application to per capita county policy expenditures. Regional Science and Urban Economics 22 (1992) 317-331
38. Larsen M. Direction for freight performance measures. Performance Measure to Improve Transportation Systems and Agency Operations. Transportation Research Board Conference Proceedings vol. 26 (2001), National Academy Press, Washington, DC 143-146
39. Lee D.A. Requiem for large-scale models. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 39 3 (1973) 163-178
40. Lomax, T., Turner, S., Shunk, G., Levinson, H.S., Pratt, R.H., Bay, P.N., Douglas, G.B., 1997. Quantifying congestion: volume 1, final report. National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 398. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
41. MacKinnon, R.D., Lau, R., 1973. Measuring accessibility change. In: Bourne, L.S., R.D. MacKinnon, J.W. (Eds.), The Form of Cities in Central Canada: Selected Papers. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp. 120-137.
42. Martin, W.A., McGuckin, N.A., 1998. Travel estimation techniques for urban planning. National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 365. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
43. McCann P. The Economics of Location: A Logistics-Costs Approach (1998), Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg
44. Medda F., Nijkamp P., and Rietveld P. Urban land use for transport systems and city shapes. Geographical Analysis 35 1 (2003) 46-57
45. Meyer M.D., and Miller E.J. Urban Transportation Planning: A Decision-oriented Approach. second ed. (2001), McGraw Hill, Boston
46. Miller, J.S., Demetsky, M.J., 1998. Using historical data to measure transportation infrastructure constraints on land use. (Report No. FHWA/VTRC 98-R32). Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, VA.
47. Miller E.J., and Ibrahim A. Urban form and vehicular travel: some empirical findings. Transportation Research Record 1617 (1998) 18-27
48. Miller, E.J., Kriger, D.S., Hunt, J.D., 1999. Integrated urban models for simulation of transit and land-use policies: guidelines for implementation and use. Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Report 48. National Academy Press,Washington, DC.
49. Miller E.J., Hunt J.D., Abraham J.E., and Salvini P.A. Microsimulating urban systems. Environment and Urban Systems 28 1 (2004) 9-44
50. Mills E.S. Urban Economics (1970), Scott, Foresman, Glenview, IL
51. Moore, T., Thorsnes, P., 1994. The transportation/land use connection: a framework for practical policy. American Planning Association Planning Advisory Service Report, pp. 448-449.
52. Muraco W.A. Intraurban accessibility. Economic Geography 48 (1972) 388-405
53. Ogden K.W. Truck movement and access in urban areas. Journal of Transportation Engineering 117 1 (1991) 71-90
54. Ortúzar J.d.D., and Willumsen L.G. Modelling Transport. second ed. (1996), John Wiley & Sons, Chichester
55. Rabianski J.S., DeLisle J.R., and Carn N.G. Corporate real estate site selection: a community-specific information framework. The Journal of Real Estate Research 22 1-2 (2001) 165
56. Ryan S. Property values and transportation facilities: finding the transportation-land use connection. Journal of Planning Literature 13 4 (1999) 412-427
57. Shaw S.L., and Xin X. Integrated land use and transportation interaction: a temporal GIS exploratory data analysis approach. Journal of Transport Geography 11 (2003) 103-115
58. Sheldrake, M., 2001. Migration of traffic volume flow map from CADD to GIS. University of Calgary, Department of Geography (unpublished report).
59. Shukla V., and Waddell P. Firm location and land use in discrete urban space. Regional Science and Urban Economics 21 (1991) 225-253
60. Staley, R., 2002. Traffic flow GIS database development. University of Calgary (unpublished report), pp. 1-52.
61. Stanilov K. Accessibility and land use: the case of suburban Seattle, 1960-1990. Regional Studies 37 8 (2003) 783-794
62. Stewart J.Q. A measure of the influence of population at distance. Sociometry 5 (1942) 63-71
63. Talen E., and Anselin L. Assessing spatial equity: an evaluation of measures of accessibility to public playgrounds. Environment and Planning A 30 (1998) 595-613
64. Vasiliev I.R. Visualization of spatial dependence: an elementary view of spatial autocorrelation. In: Arlinghaus S.L. (Ed). Practical Handbook of Spatial Statistics (1996), CRC Press, Boca Raton 17-30
65. Vessali K.V. Land use impacts of rapid transit: a review of the empirical literature. Berkeley Planning Journal 11 (1996) 71-105
66. Vickerman R.W. Accessibility, attraction, and potential: a review of some concepts and their use in determining mobility. Environment and Planning A 6 (1974) 675-691
67. Von Thunen J.H. Der Isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landschaft und Nationalokeomie, Hamburg. Translated by C Wartenberg (1966) Von Thunen's Isolated State (1826), Pergamon Press, Oxford
68. Wachs M., and Kumangai T.G. Physical accessibility as a social indicator. Socio-Economic Planning Science 7 (1973) 437-456
69. Wang F. Modeling commuting patterns in Chicago in a GIS environment: a job accessibility perspective. Professional Geographer 52 1 (2000) 120-133
70. Weber A. Theory of the Location of Industries (1929), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
71. Weber J., and Kwan M.-P. Bringing time back in: a study on the influence of travel time variations and facility opening hours on individual accessibility. The Professional Geographer 54 2 (2002) 226-240
72. Wegener M. Operational urban models: state of the art. Journal of the American Planning Association 60 (1994) 17-29
73. Wegner, M., Fürst, F., 1999. Land use transport interaction: state of the art. Deliverable 2a of the project TRANSLAND of the 4th RTD Framework Programme of the European Commission. Institut fur Ramumplanung, University Dortmund.
74. White H. A heteroskedastic-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48 (1980) 817-838
75. Wickstrom G.B. Defining balanced transportation: a question of opportunity. Traffic Quarterly 25 (1971) 337-350
76. Wilson A.G. Entropy in Urban and Regional Modelling (1970), Pion, London
77. Wilson A.G. Complex Spatial Systems: The Modelling Foundations of Urban and Regional Analysis (2000), Pearson Education, New York
78. Woudsma C. Understanding the movement of goods, not people: issues, evidence and potential. Urban Studies 38 13 (2001) 2439-2455
79. Woudsma C.G., and Jensen J.F. Accessibility and freight: transportation and land use: exploring spatial-temporal dimensions. In: Levinson D., and Kraus J.D. (Eds). Chapter 13 in Destinations: Accessibility in the Modern Age (2005), Elsevier, New York