Reconstruction of some hybrid phylogenetic networks with homoplasies from distances

Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

Volumn 69, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 2561-2590

  Willson, Stephen J ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Homoplasy; Hybrid; Network; Phylogeny; Recombination

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; HYBRIDIZATION; MATHEMATICS; PHYLOGENY;

HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC;

EID: 35648967624     PISSN: 00928240     EISSN: 15229602     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11538-007-9232-y     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bandelt, H.-J., Dress, A., 1992. Split decomposition: a new and useful approach to phylogenetic analysis of distance data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1, 242-252.
2. Baroni, M., Semple, C., Steel, M., 2004. A framework for representing reticulate evolution. Ann. Comb. 8, 391-408.
3. Bordewich, M., Semple, C., 2007. Computing the minimum number of hybridization events for a consistent evolutionary history. Discret. Appl. Math. 155, 914-928.
4. Felsenstein, J., 2004. Inferring Phylogenies. Sinauer, Sunderland.
5. Fitch, W.M., 1981. A non-sequential method for constructing trees and hierarchical classifications. J. Mol. Evol. 18, 30-37.
6. Gusfield, D., Eddhu, S., Langley, C., 2004a. Optimal, efficient reconstruction of phylogenetic networks with constrained recombination. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 2, 173-213.
7. Gusfield, D., Eddhu, S., Langley, C., 2004b. The fine structure of galls in phylogenetic networks. INFORMS J. Comput. 16(4), 459-469.
8. Hein, J., 1990. Reconstructing evolution of sequences subject to recombination using parsimony. Math. Biosci. 98, 185-200.
9. Hein, J., 1993. A heuristic method to reconstruct the history of sequences subject to recombination. J. Mol. Evol. 36, 396-405.
10. Li, W.-H., 1981. A simple method for constructing phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 1085-1089.
11. Moret, B.M.E., Nakhleh, L., Warnow, T., Linder, C.R., Tholse, A., Padolina, A., Sun, J., Timme, R., 2004. Phylogenetic networks: modeling, reconstructibility, and accuracy. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 1, 13-23.
12. Nakhleh, L., Warnow, T., Linder, C.R., 2004. Reconstructing reticulate evolution in species-theory and practice. In: Bourne, P.E., Gusfield, D. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Annual International Conference on Computational Molecular Biology, pp. 337-346. RECOMB'04, San Diego, California, 27-31 March 2004. ACM, New York.
13. Saitou, N., Nei, M., 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4, 406-425.
14. Sattath, S., Tversky, A., 1977. Additive similarity trees. Psychometrika 42, 319-345.
15. Sokal, R.R., Sneath, P.H.A., 1963. Numerical Taxonomy. Freeman, San Francisco.
16. Wang, L., Zhang, K., Zhang, L., 2001. Perfect phylogenetic networks with recombination. J. Comput. Biol. 8, 69-78.
17. Willson, S.J., 2006. Unique reconstruction of tree-like phylogenetic networks from distances between leaves. Bull. Math. Biol. 68, 919-944.