Child Custody

Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology, Three-Volume Set

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 323-328

  Martindale, David A ^a   Gould, Jonathan W ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35648955756     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B0-12-657410-3/00975-2     Document Type: Chapter

References (20)

1. Ackerman M.J., Ackerman M.C. Custody evaluation practices: A survey of experienced professionals (revisited). Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 1997, 28:137-145.
2. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist 2002, 57:1060-1073. American Psychological Association.
3. Bow J.N., Quinnell F.A. Psychologists' current practices and procedures in child custody evaluations: Five years after American Psychological Association Guidelines. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 2001, 32:261-268.
4. Ceci S.J., Hembrooke H. Expert witnesses in child abuse cases: What can and should be said in court 1998, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
5. Specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists. Law and Human Behavior 1991, 15(6):655-665. Committee on Ethical Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists.
6. Coons J., Mnookin R., Sugarman S. Deciding what's best for children. Notre Dame Journal of Law and Public Policy 1993, 7:465-490.
7. Eyde L.D., Robertson G.J., Krug S.E., Moreland K.L., Robertston A.G., Shewan C.M., Harrison P.L., Porch B.E., Hammer A.L., Primoff E.S. Responsible test use: Case studies for assessing human behavior 1993, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, [The authors are also referred to, collectively, as the Test User Training Work Group of the Joint Committee on Testing Practices.].
8. Greenberg S.A., Shuman D.W. Irreconcilable conflict between therapeutic and forensic roles. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 1997, 28(1):50-57.
9. Hjelt S. Professional psychology: A view from the bench. Register Report 2000, 26(1):8-13.
10. Kelly J.B., Lamb M.E. Using child development research to make appropriate custody and access decisions for young children. Family & Conciliation Courts Review 2000, 38(3):297-311.
11. Krauss D.A., Sales B.D. Legal standards, expertise, and experts in the resolution of contested child custody cases. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law 2000, 6(4):843-879.
12. LaFortune K.A., Carpenter B.N. Custody evaluations: A survey of mental health professionals. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 1998, 16:207-224.
13. Lamb M.E., Kelly J.B. Using empirical literature to guide the development of parenting plans for young children: A rejoinder to Solomon and Biringen. Family Court Review 2001, 39:365-371.
14. Martindale D.A., Gould J.W. The forensic model: Ethics and scientific methodology applied to custody evaluations. Journal of Child Custody: Research, Issues, and Practices 2004, 1:1-22.
15. Mnookin R. Child custody adjudication and judicial function in the face of indeterminacy. Law and Contemporary Problems 1975, 39:226-293.
16. Otto R.K., Buffington-Vollum J.K., Edens J.F. Child custody evaluation. Forensic Psychology 2003, 11:179-208. Wiley, New York. A.M. Goldstein (Ed.).
17. Pruett K.D., Solnit A.J. Psychological and ethical considerations in the preparation of the mental health professional as expert witness. Expert witnesses in child abuse cases: What can and should be said in court 1998, 123-136. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. S.J. Ceci, H. Hembroke (Eds.).
18. Shuman D.W. The use of empathy in forensic examinations. Ethics and Behavior 1993, 3:223-302.
19. Warshak R.A. Blanket restrictions: Overnight contact between parents and young children. Family and Conciliation Courts Review 2000, 38(4):422-445.
20. Whiteside M.F. Custody for children age 5 and younger. Family & Conciliation Courts Review 1998, 36(4):479-502.