Frames of reference for the light-from-above prior in visual search and shape judgements

Cognition

Volumn 107, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 137-150

  Adams, Wendy J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Depth; Frame of reference; Gravity; Light from above; Orientation; Prior; Shading; Shape; Shape from shading; Tilt; Vestibular; Visual perception; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LIGHT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA IMAGE; VISION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

COGNITION; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 40649128760     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Adams, W.J. (2007). A common light-prior for visual search, shape, and reflectance judgments. Journal of Vision, 7(11):11, 1-7, http://journalofvision.org/7/11/11/, doi:10.1167/7.11.11.
2. Adams W.J., Graf E.W., and Ernst M. Experience can change the 'light-from-above' prior. Nature Neuroscience 7 (2004) 1057-1058
3. Adams W.J., and Mamassian P. Bayesian combination of ambiguous shape cues. Journal of Vision 4 (2004) 921-929
4. Brewster D. On the optical illusion of the conversion of cameos into intaglios, and of intaglios into cameos, with an account of other analogous phenomena. Edinburgh Journal of Science 4 (1826) 99-108
5. Dyde R.T., Jenkin M.R., and Harris L.R. The subjective visual vertical and the perceptual upright. Experimental Brain Research 173 (2006) 612-622
6. Enns J.T., and Rensink R.A. Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. Science 247 (1990) 721-723
7. Hamasaki I., Hasebe S., and Ohtsuki H. Static ocular counterroll: Video-based analysis after minimizing the false-torsion factors. Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology 49 (2005) 497-504
8. Hershberger W. Attached-shadow orientation perceived as depth by chickens reared in an environment illuminated from below. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 73 (1970) 407-411
9. Howard I.P., Bergström S.S., and Ohmi M. Shape from shading in different frames of reference. Perception 19 (1990) 523-530
10. Humphrey G.K., Goodale M.A., Bowen C.V., Gati J.S., Vilis T., Rutt B.K., et al. Differences in perceived shape from shading correlate with activity in early visual areas. Current Biology 7 (1997) 144-147
11. Jenkin H.L., Jenkin M.R., Dyde R.T., and Harris L.R. Shape-from-shading depends on visual, gravitational and body-oriented cues. Perception 33 (2004) 1453-1461
12. Kingma H., Stegeman P., and Vogels R. Ocular torsion induced by static and dynamic visual stimulation and static whole body roll. European Archives of Oto-rhino-laryngology 254 (1997) S61-S63
13. Kleffner D.A., and Ramachandran V.S. On the perception of shape from shading. Perception and Psychophysics 52 (1992) 18-36
14. Landy M.S., Maloney L.T., Johnston E.B., and Young M. Measurement and modelling of depth cue-combination - in defence of weak fusion. Vision Research 35 (1995) 389-412
15. Lee T.S., Yang C.F., Romero R.D., and Mumford D. Neural activity in early visual cortex reflects behavioural experience and higher-order saliency. Nature Neuroscience 5 (2002) 589-597
16. Luyat M., Gentaz E., Corte T.R., and Guerraz M. Reference frames and haptic perception of orientation: Body and hand tilt effects on the oblique effect. Perception and Psychophysics 63 (2001) 541-554
17. Mamassian P., and Goutcher R. Prior knowledge on the illumination position. Cognition 81 (2001) B1-B9
18. Mamassian P., Jentszch I., Bacon B.A., and Schweinberger S.R. Neural correlates of shape from shading. Neuroreport 14 (2003) 971-975
19. Mittelstaedt H. Somatic graviception. Biological Psychology 42 (1996) 53-74
20. Mittelstaedt H. Origin and processing of postural information. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 22 (1998) 473-478
21. Ramachandran. Perceiving shape from shading. Scientific American (1988) 58-65
22. Santhi N., and Reeves A. The roles of distractor noise and target certainty in search: A signal detection model. Vision Research 44 (2004) 1235-1256
23. Schworm H.D., Ygge J., Pansell T., and Lennerstrand G. Assessment of ocular counterroll during head tilt using binocular video oculography. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 43 (2002) 662-667
24. Sun J., and Perona P. Early computation of shape and reflectance in the visual system. Nature 379 (1996) 165-168
25. Sun J., and Perona P. Shading and stereo in early perception of shape and reflectance. Perception 26 (1997) 519-529
26. Sun J., and Perona P. Where is the sun?. Nature Neuroscience 1 (1998) 183-184
27. Taira M., Nose I., Inoue K., and Tsutsui K. Cortical areas related to attention to 3D surface structures based on shading: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 14 (2001) 959-966
28. Tsutsui K.I., Jiang M., Yara K., et al. Integration of perspective and disparity cues in surface-orientation-selective neurons of area CIP. Journal of Neurophysiology 86 (2001) 2856-2867
29. Watson A.B., and Pelli D.G. QUEST: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Perception and Psychophysics 33 (1983) 113-120
30. Welchman A.E., Deubelius A., Conrad V., Bülthoff H.H., and Kourtzi Z. 3D shape perception from combined depth cues in human visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience 8 (2005) 820-827
31. Wolfe, and Horowitz. What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5 (2004) 1-7
32. Yonas A., Kuskowski M., and Sternfels S. The role of frames of reference in the development of responsiveness to shading information. Child Development 50 (1979) 495-500