Review of the Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Studies

Review of the Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Studies

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-148

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35549003190     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.17226/11481     Document Type: Book

References (168)

1. Canadian Hydrographic Service. 2005. Water Level Bulletin. Boundary Waters Treaty, 1909. Monthly. Available on-line at http://chswww.bur.dfo.ca/danp/Graphs /bulletin.pdf. Accessed July 2005.
2. Clinton Edmonds and Associates. 2002. Lake Ontario and St. Lawrence River- Changes in the Institutional Structure and Their Impact on Water Levels, 1950-2001. Report to International Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Study Board. Ottawa, CA: University of Ottawa, Institute of the Environment.
3. Environment Canada. 2005. Level News. Monthly. Available on-line at http://www.on.ec.gc.ca/water/level-news/intro-e.html. Accessed July 2005.
4. Haimes, Y. (Ed.). 1981. Risk/Benefit Analysis in Water Resources Planning and Management. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
5. IGLD (International Great Lakes Datum). 1985. The International Great Lakes Datum of 1985. Available on-line at http://chswww.bur.dfo.ca/danp/igld1985.html. Accessed July 2005.
6. ISLRBC (International St. Lawrence River Board of Control). 2004. Available on- line at http://www.islrbc.org. Accessed July 2005.
7. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). Great Lakes Envi- ronmental Research Laboratory. 2005. Great Lakes Water Levels. Available on-line at http://www.glerl.noaa.gov/data/now/wlevels/levels.html. Accessed August 2005.
8. USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) Detroit District. 2005. Great Lakes Wa- ter Levels. Available on-line at http://www.lre.usace.army.mil/greatlakes/hh/ great- lakeswaterlevels. Accessed July 2005.
9. Werick, W. 2005. Presentation at to the NRC Committee to Review the Lake On- tario-St. Lawrence River Studies. June 14, 2005. Niagara-on-the-Lake, On- tario, Canada.
10. BACK 2. IJC (International Joint Commission). 1999. Plan of Study for Criteria Review in the Orders of Approval for Regulation of Lake Ontario-St. Law- rence River Levels and Flows. Available on-line at http://www.ijc.org/php/publi- cations/html/pos/ pose.html. Accessed September 2005.
11. BACK 6. Peer Review Triage Strategy (draft).doc.
12. Cardwell, H., B. Faber, and K. Spading. 2004. Reservoir Operating Plan Evalua- tion (ROPE) Study for the Mississippi Headwaters Collaborative Models for Planning in the Mississippi Headwaters. Available on-line at http://www.iwr.usace.army.mil/iwr/svp/rope.htm. Adapted from Conference Pro- ceedings of the ASCE Environmental and Water Resources Conference, Salt Lake City, UT., June 28-July 1, 2004.
13. Cohon, J. L. 1978. Multiobjective Programming and Planning. New York: Aca- demic Press.
14. Cohon, J. L., and D. H. Marks. 1975. A review and evaluation of multiobjective programming techniques. Water Resources Research 11(2):208-220.
15. Connor, J. L., L. Cartwright, and K. Stephenson. 2004. Collaborative water supply planning: A shared vision approach for the Rappahannock Basin in Virginia. World Water and Environmental Resources Congress 2004. In Sehlke, G., D. F. Hayes, and D. K. Stevens (eds.) Critical Transitions in Water and Environ- mental Resources Management. ASCE Environmental and Water Resources Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, June 27-July 1, 2004.
16. Croley II, T. E. 2003. Great Lakes Climate Change Hydrologic Impact Assess- ment. IJC Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Regulation Study. NOAA Techni- cal Memorandum GLERL-126, Great Lakes Environmental Research Labora- tory, Ann Arbor, MI, September 2003.
17. Fan, Y., and D. Fay. 2001. Variation of St. Lawrence River Hourly Water Levels About the Quarter-Monthly Mean. Hydrology and Hydraulics Technical Working Group. Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Study, International Joint Commission.
18. Fan, Y., and D. Fay. 2002. Final Report on the Development of Empirical Rela- tionships to Estimate Water Levels of the St. Lawrence River from Montreal to Trois Rivères. Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Regulation Office, Meteorological Service of Canada-Ontario Region, Environment Canada. March 28, 2002 (with corrections of October 2002).
19. Fan, Y., and D. Fay. 2003. Estimation of Lake Erie Outflows for Use in the Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Study. Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Regulation Of- fice, Meteorological Service of Canada-Ontario Region, Environment Canada. December 20.
20. Goicochea, A., D.R. Hansen, and L. Duckstein. 1982. Multiobjective Decision Analysis with Engineering and Business Applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
21. Great Lakes Climate Change Hydrologic Impact Assessment I.J.C. Lake Ontario- St. Lawrence River Regulation Study. NOAA Technical Memorandum GLERL-126, September 2003.
22. Hagen, E., and J. Kiang. 2003. Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin Water Supply. Available on-line at http://www.iwr.usace.army.mil/iwr/svp/ icprbstudy.htm. Accessed on. August 7, 2005.
23. IWR (Institute for Water Resources). 1995. National Study of Water Management Dur- ing Drought: The Report to the US Congress IWR Report 94-NDS-12 (September).
24. th St., NW Washington, DC 20001.
25. Lofgren, B. M. 2003. Simulation of possible future effects of Greenhouse Warm- ing on Great Lakes water supply using a regional climate model. Proceedings, 17th Conference on Hydrology, Long Beach, CA., February 8-13, 2003. Bos- ton, MA: American Meteorological Society.
26. Lofgren B. M. 2004. Global warming effects on Great Lakes water: More precipitation but less water? In Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Hydrology, 84th Annual Meeting of the American Meteorological Society, Seattle, WA., January 11-15, 2004.
27. Lofgren, B. M., F. H. Quinn, A. H. Clites, R. A. Assel, A. J. Eberhardt, and C. L. Luukkonen. 2002. Evaluation of potential impacts on Great Lakes water re- sources based on climate scenarios of two GCMs. Journal of Great Lakes Re- search 28(4):537-554.
28. LOSLR Study (Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Study Board [LOSLR]). 2005. Op- tions for Managing Lake Ontario and St. Lawrence River Water Levels & Flows: Final Report. July 1, 2005 Draft. Copy on file at The National Acad- emies, Water Science and Technology Board, 500 5th St., NW Washington, DC 20001.
29. National Assessment Synthesis Team. 2000. Climate Change Impacts on the United States. A Report of the National Assessment Synthesis Team-US Global Change Research Program, 2000. Available on-line at http://www.usgcrp.gov/usgcrp/Library/nationalassessment/overview.htm. Accessed September 2005.
30. NRC (National Research Council). 2004. Adaptive Management for Water Re- sources Planning. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
31. NRC. 2005. Valuing Ecosystem Services: Toward Better Environmental Decision- Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
32. Palmer, R. N. 1998. A history of shared vision modeling in the ACT-ACF compre- hensive study: A modeler's perspective, presented at the 25th Annual Confer- ence on Water Resources Planning and Management, Chicago, IL., June, 1998.
33. Palmer, R. N. 1999. Modeling Water Resources Opportunities, Challenges, and Trade-offs: The Use of Shared Vision Modeling for Negotiation and Conflict Resolution, Keynote Invited Presentation, presented at the 26th Annual Na- tional Conference, Water Resources Planning and Management Division of ASCE, Tempe, AZ., June, 1999.
34. Simonovic, S. P., and H. Fahmy. 1999. A new modeling approach for water re- sources policy analysis. Water Resources Research 35(1):295-304.
35. Simonovic, S. P., and V. Rajasekaram. 2004. Integrated Analyses of Canada's Wa- ter Resources: A System Dynamics Model. Canadian Water Resources Journal 29(4):223-250.
36. Sousounis, P. J. 2002. Special issue on Global Warming. Journal of Great Lakes Research 28(4).
37. Stephenson, K. 2003. The what and why of shared vision planning for water sup- ply. A paper prepared for the panel session on Collaborative Water Supply Planning: A Shared Vision Approach for the Rappahannock River Basin, Uni- versities Council on Water Resources, Water Security in the 21st Century Con- ference. Washington, DC. July 30, 2003. Available on-line at http://www.iwr. usace.army.mil/iwr/svp/WaterSecurity03Text.pdf.
38. Sterman, J. D. 2000. Business Dynamics-Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. New York: McGraw-Hill.
39. SVM 1. LOSLR Study Board. n.d. Evaluation Process: The Shared Vision Model. Provided for review as SVM document.
40. SVM 2. Shared Vision Model for the Design and Evaluation of Alternative Regula- tion of Lake Ontario Releases into the St. Lawrence River. Includes Toronto Board Room April 24.xls.
41. SVM 3. Shared Vision Model for the Design and Evaluation of Alternative Regula- tion of Lake Ontario Releases into the St. Lawrence River. Documentation Report. February 15, 2005.
42. U.S. Water Resources Council. 1983. Economic and Environmental Principles and Guidelines for Water and Related Land Resources Implementation Stud- ies. Available on-line at http://www.iwr.usace.army.mil/iwr/pdf/p&g.pdf. 48 CFR 10249 (March 10).
43. Werick, W. 2000. The future of shared vision planning. In Hotchkiss, R. H. and M. Glade (eds.) Water Resources 2000: Building Partnerships. Joint Conference on Water Resource Engineering and Water Resources Planning and Man- agement 2000, Minneapolis, MN., July 30-August 2, 2000.
44. Werick, W. 2005. Presentations on shared vision planning and modeling in the LOSLR Study to the NRC committee. Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario, CA. June 11-13, 2005.
45. Wescoat, J. L. Jr. 1987. The 'Practical Range of Choice' in water resources geography. Progress in Human Geography (1987): 41-59.
46. White, G. F. 1964. Choice of Adjustment to Floods. Research Paper No. 93. Chi- cago: University of Chicago, Department of Geography.
47. Blomgren, S., H. Hanson, and M. Larson. 1997. Modeling of wave generation and transformation. Scientific report, Appendix A: Documentation. Subproject 4: Nearshore and coastline processes, 1 year progress report, Baltic Sea System Study.
48. Christian J. Stewart Consulting. 2004. A Summary of Existing Land Use, Land Use Trends and Land Use Management Policies along the Lake Ontario-St. Law- rence River Shoreline: Implications for Future Water Level Management. Pre- pared for the Coastal Technical Working Group, International Joint Commis- sion.
49. EUrosion Project. 2004. Living with coastal erosion in Europe: Sediment and Space for Sustainability PART I-Major findings and Policy Recommenda- tions of the EUROSION project Service contract B4-3301/2001/329175/ MAR/B3, Coastal erosion-Evaluation of the need for action. Directorate General Environment, European Commission.
50. EUrosion Project. 2004b. Living with coastal erosion in Europe: Sediment and Space for Sustainability. PART IV-A guide to coastal erosion management practices in Europe: Lessons Learned Service contract B4-3301/2001/ 329175/MAR/B3. Coastal Erosion-Evaluation of the need for action. Di- rectorate General Environment, European Commission.
51. FEPS 1. Zuzek, P. J., and R. B. Nairn. n.d. Automated Lake wide Flooding Predic- tions and Economic Damages on Lake Ontario.
52. FEPS 2. Nairn, R. B., and P. J. Zuzek. n.d. Automated Lake wide Erosion Predictions and Economic Damages on Lake Ontario.
53. FEPS 3. FEPS Model.
54. FEPS 4. Sciremammano, F., and S. Renzetti. 2005. FEPS/Coastal Discussion Pa- per.
55. FEPS 5. Baird & Associates. Beach Access Performance Indicator Summary.
56. FEPS 6. Memorandum from Zuzek, P.J., and R. Roblin (Baird & Associates) to IJC Study Participants re: Integration of Beach User Economics into the Shared Vision Model. April 7, 2004.
57. FEPS 7. Baird & Associates. March 2004. Erosion Performance Indicator: Meth- odology and Shared Vision Model Application. Prepared for I.J.C. Plan For- mulation and Evaluation Group.
58. FEPS 8. Baird & Associates. February 2005. Flooding Performance Indicator: Methodology and Shared Vision Model Application. Prepared for IJC Plan Formulation and Evaluation Group. Oakville, Ontario: Baird & Associates.
59. FEPS 9. Baird & Associates. February 2004. Shore Protection Performance Indi- cator: Methodology and Shared Vision Model Application. Oakville, Ontario: Baird & Associates.
60. FEPS 10. Barrier Beaches and Dunes PI Summary.
61. FEPS 11. Contextual Narrative for "Sediment Budget PI" Lake Ontario and the Upper St. Lawrence River.
62. FEPS 12. Contextual Narrative for Erosion, Flooding, and Existing Shore Protec- tion PIs Lake Ontario and the Upper St. Lawrence River.
63. FEPS 13. Contextual Narrative for "Beach Access" and "Barrier Beaches & Dunes PIs" Lake Ontario and the Upper St. Lawrence River.
64. FEPS 14. Baird & Associates. Erosion Performance Indicator Summary.
65. FEPS 15. Baird & Associates. Flooding Performance Indicator Summary.
66. FEPS 16. Sediment Budget PI Summary.
67. FEPS 17. Baird & Associates. Existing Shoreline Protection Performance Indica- tor Summary. FEPS 18. Minutes/Observations from FEPS Independent Technical Review 12/13/2002 and 7/26/2002 notes.
68. FEPS 18. Minutes/Observations from FEPS Independent Technical Review 12/13/2002 and 7/26/2002 notes.
69. Hartford, D. N. D., and G. B. Baecher. 2004. Risk and Uncertainty in Dam Safety. London: Thomas Telford.
70. IJC (International Joint Commission) International Red River Basin Task Force. 2000. The Next Flood: Getting Prepared. Ottawa and Washington: Final Re- port to the International Joint Commission.
71. Morgan, M. G., and M. Henrion. 1990. Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Risk and Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. New York: Cam- bridge University Press.
72. Nairn, R.B., and H. N. Southgate. 1993. Deterministic profile modeling of near- shore processes: Part 2, Sediment transport and beach profile development. Coastal Engineering 19:57-96.
73. Nairn, R. B., P. Zuzek, A. Morang, and L. E. Parson. 1997. Effectiveness of Beach Nourishment on Cohesive Shores, St. Joseph, Lake Michigan. USACE Tech- nical Report CHL-97-15.
74. NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology). 2005. Engineering Statis- tics Handbook. Available on-line at http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/. Accessed October 2005.
75. NRC (National Research Council). 2000. Risk Analysis and Uncertainty in Flood Damage Reduction Studies. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
76. NRC. 2001. Under the Weather: Climate, Ecosystems, and Infectious Disease. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
77. Parson, L. E., A. Morang, and R.B. Nairn. 1996. Geologic Effects on Behavior of Beach Fill and Shoreline Stability for Southeast Lake Michigan. USACE Technical Report CERC-96-10. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Corps of Engi- neers Waterways Experiment Station.
78. Pilkey, O.H., and J. A.G. Cooper. 2004. Society and sea level rise. Science 303:1781.
79. Rescher, N. 1998. Predicting the Future: An Introduction to the Theory of Fore- casting. New York: State University of New York Press.
80. Resio, D., and W. Perrie. 1989. Implications of an F-4 equilibrium range for wind- generated waves. Journal of Phys. Oc. 19(2):193.
81. Scott, D, D. Schwab, P. Zuzek, and C. Padala. 2004. Hindcasting wave conditions on the North American Great Lakes. Available on-line at http://www.ocean- weather.com /8thwave/ Papers/D4.pdf. Accessed October 2005.
82. Simonovic, S.P., and R.W. Carson. 2003. Flooding in the Red River Basin-Lessons from post flood activities. Natural Hazards 28:345-365.
83. Southgate, H. N., and R. B. Narin. 1993. Deterministic profile modeling of near- shore processes: Part 1, waves and currents. Coastal Engineering 19:27-56.
84. USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). 2003. Coastal Engineering Manual- Chapter 6, Reliability based design of coastal structures EM1110-2-1100 (Part VI).
85. Voortman, H. G., P. van Gelder, and J. K. Vrijling. 2002. Risk-based design of large-scale flood defence systems. 28th International Conference on Coastal Engineering. Pp. 2373-2385 In Solving Coastal Conundrums. July 7, 2002- July 12, 2002. Cardiff.
86. Zuzek, P. J. 2005. Presentation to the NRC Committee to Review the Lake On- tario-St. Lawrence River Studies. June 14 and June 15, 2005. Niagara-on-the- Lake, Ontario, Canada.
87. Ashworth, S. M. 1997. Comparison between restored and reference sedge meadow wetlands in south-central Wisconsin. Wetlands 17:518-527.
88. Baldwin, A. H., and I. A. Mendelssohn. 1998. Effects of salinity and water level on coastal marshes: an experimental test of disturbance as a catalyst for vegeta- tion change. Aquatic Botany 61:255-268.
89. Bedford, K. W. 1992. The physical effects of the Great Lakes on tributaries and wetlands. J. Great Lakes Research 18:571-589.
90. Campbell, J. M. 1992. Habitat and population ecology of Lobelia Kalmii on Presque Ilse, PA correlated with changes in Lake Erie water levels. J. Pennsyl- vania Academy of Science 66:123-127.
91. Chow-Fraser, P. 2005. Ecosystem response to changes in water level of Lake On- tario marshes: lessons from the restoration of Cootes Paradise Marsh. Hydro- biologia. 539:189-204.
92. Chow-Fraser, P., V. L. Lougheed, B. Crosbie, V. LeThiec, L. Simser, and J. Lord. 1998. Long-term response of the biotic community to fluctuating water levels and changes in water quality in Cootes Paradise Marsh, a degraded coastal wet- land of L. Ontario. Wetland Ecol. Manage. 6: 19-42.
93. Dieffenbacher-Krall, A. C. 1996. Paoleo- and historical-ecology of the Cutler grasslands, Cutler, Maine: implications for future management. Natural Areas Journal 16:3-13.
94. Eyles, N., M. Doughty, J. I. Boyce, M. Meriano, and P. Chow-Fraser. 2003. Geo- physical and sedimentological assessment of urban impacts in a Lake Ontario watershed and lagoon: Frenchman's Bay, Pickering, Ontario. Geoscience Canada. 30:115-128.
95. Fan, Y., and D. Fay. 2001. Variation of St. Lawrence River Hourly Water Levels About the Quarter-Monthly Mean. Hydrology and Hydraulics Technical Working Group. Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Study, International Joint Commission. December 2001.
96. Farney, R. A., and T. A. Bookhout. 1982. Vegetation changes in a Lake Erie marsh (Winous Point, Ottawa County, Ohio) during high water years. Ohio Journal of Science 82:103-106.
97. Franklin, J. F. 1993. Preserving biodiversity: species, ecosystems or landscapes? Ecological Applications 3(2):202-205.
98. Gaudet, C. L., and P. A. Keddy. 1988. A comparative approach to predicting com- petitive ability from plant traits. Nature 334(6179):242-243.
99. Grace, J. B. 1988. The effects of nutrient additions on mixtures of Typha latifolia L. and Typha domingensis Pers. along a water-depth gradient. Aquatic Botany 31:83-92.
100. Grace, J. B., and R. G. Wetzel. 1998. Long-term dynamics of Typha populations. Aquatic Botany 61: 137-146.
101. Greenway, K. J., and V. J. Lieffers. 1997. A boreal forest grass with an open meadow photosynthetic strategy. Canadian J. Botany 75:562-567.
102. Howard, R. J., and I. A. Mendelssohn. 1995. Effect of increased water depth on growth of a common perennial freshwater-intermediate marsh species in coastal Louisiana. Wetlands 15:82-91.
103. Hupp, C. R. 2000. Hydrology, geomorphology, and vegetation of Coastal Plain rivers in southeastern USA. Hydrological Processes 14:2991-3010.
104. IERM 1. Limno-Tech, Inc. DRAFT of April 2005. Development of an Integrated Ecological Response Model (IERM) for the Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Study.
105. IERM 2. IERM Model (version 4.1.1).
106. IERM 3. Limno-Tech, Inc. DRAFT of March 2004. Development of the Integrated Ecological Response Model (IERM) for the Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Study.
107. IERM 4. Limno-Tech, Inc. April, 2005. Integrated Ecological Response User's Manual.
108. IERM 5 RS. Turgin, K, O. Champoux, S. Martin, and J. Morin. April, 2005. Modelisation des grandes classes de milieux humides de la plaine inondable du fleuve Saint-Laurent: Consideration de la succession des communautes vegetales.107 Wetlands Model for the Lower St. Lawrence River [French].
109. IERM 6 RS. Morin, J., O. Champoux, S. Martin, and K. Turgeon. April, 2005. Modelisation integree de la reponse de l'ecosyteme dans le fleuve Saint- Laurent: Rapport final des activities enterprises dans le cadre du Plan d'etude sur la regularisation du lac Ontario et du fleuve Saint Laurent. 108 Species at Risk Model for the Lower St. Lawrence River [French].
110. Kao, J. T., J. E. Titus, and W. Zhu. 2003. Differential nitrogen and phosphorus retention by five wetland plant species. Wetlands. 23: 979-987.
111. Keddy, P. A. 1984. Quantifying a within-lake gradient of wave energy in Gillfillan Lake, Nova Scotia. Canadian J. Botany 62:301-309.
112. Kelley, J. C., T. M. Burton, and W. R. Enslin. 1984. The effects of natural water level fluctuations on N and P cycling in a Great Lakes marsh. Wetlands 4:159-175.
113. Keough, J. R., T. A. Thompson, G. R. Guntenspergen, and D. A. Wilcox. 1999. Hydrogeomorphic factors and ecosystem responses in coastal wetlands of the Great Lakes. Wetlands 19:821-834.
114. Kercher, S. M., Q. J. Carpenter, and J. B. Zedler. 2004. Interrelationships of hy- drologic disturbance, reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) and native plants in Wisconsin wet meadows. Natural Areas Journal 24: 316-325.
115. Kozlowski, T. T. 1984. Plant responses to flooding of soil. Bioscience 34:162-167.
116. Lauck, T., C. W. Clark, M. Mangel, and G. R. Munro. 1998. Implementing the precautionary principle in fisheries management through marine reserves. Ecological Applications 8(1) Supplement: Ecosystem Management for Sus- tainable Marine Fisheries S72-S78.
117. Lenssen, J., F. Menting, W. Van Der Putten, and K. Blom. 1999. Control of plant species richness and zonation of functional groups along a freshwater flooding gradient. Oikos 86: 523-534.
118. Lessman, J. M., I. A. Mendelssohn, M. W. Hester, and K. L. McKee. 1997. Popu- lation variation in growth response to flooding of three marsh grasses. Eco- logical Engineering 8:31-47.
119. Li, S., S. R. Pezeshki, and S. Goodwin. 2004. Effects of soil moisture regimes on photosynthesis and growth in cattail (Typha latifolia). Acta Oecologica. 25: 17-22.
120. Lougheed, V. L., T. Theÿsmeÿer, T. Smith, and P. Chow-Fraser. 2004. Carp exclu- sion, food-web interactions, and the restoration of Cootes Paradise Marsh. J. Great Lakes Res. 30 (1): 44-57.
121. MacDonald, S. E., and V. J. Lieffers. 1993. Phizome plasticity and clonal foraging of Calamagrostis Canadensis in response to habitat heterogeneity. Journal of Ecology 81:769-776.
122. Makarewicz, J. C., J. M. Haynes, R. C. Dilcher, C. J. Norment, and T. Lewis. 2000. Biological Survey of Yanty Creek Marsh. New York Office of Parks and Rec- reation and Historic Preservation. Castile, NY: Western District, Genesee Re- gion, One Letchworth State Park.
123. McKee K. L., and I. A. Mendelssohn. 1989. Response of a freshwater marsh plant community to increased salinity and increased water-level. Aquatic Bot- any 34:301-316.
124. McMaster, R. 1997. Floristics, zonation and succession of vascular vegetation in fifteen beaver-impacted wetlands in western Massachusetts. Dissertation. University of Massachusetts.
125. Mendelssohn, I. A., and D. M. Burdick. 1988. The relationship of soil parameters and root metabolism to primary production in periodically inundated soils. P. 398-428. IN D. D. Hook (eds). The Ecology and Management of Wetlands. Vol. 1. Ecology of Wetlands. Portland OR: Timber Press. Meyer, M., and J. Booker. 1991. Eliciting and Analyzing Expert Judgment, a Practi- cal Guide. London, UK: Academic Press.
126. Middleton, B. 2002. Nonequilibrium dynamics of sedge meadows grazed by cattle in southern Wisconsin. Plant Ecology 161: 89-110.
127. Morgan, M., and M. Henrion. 1990. Uncertainty. A Guide To Dealing With Un- certainty in Qualitative Risk and Policy Analysis. New York: Cambridge Uni- versity Press.
128. Mulhouse, J. M., and S. M. Galatowitsch. 2003. Revegetation of prairie pothole wetlands in the mid-continental U. S.: Twelve years of post-reflooding. Plant Ecology 169:143-159.
129. Naiman, R. J., H. Décamps, and M. Pollock. 1993. The role of riparian corridors in maintaining regional biodiversity. Ecological Applications 67:1254-1269.
130. NYORHP (New York Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation). 1998. State Environmental Quality Review. Provide Shoreline Protection- Yanty Marsh, Hamlin Beach State Park.
131. Ovenden, L., and G. R. Brassard. 1989. Wetland vegetation near Old Crow, Northern Yukon. Canadian J. Botany 67:954-960.
132. Pollock, M. M., R. J. Naiman, and T. A. Hanley. 1998. Plant species richness in riparian wetlands-A test of biodiversity theory. Ecology 79(1):94-105.
133. Robert, M., P. Laporte, and R. Benoit. 2000. Summer habitat of yellow rails, Co- tunicops noveboracensis, along the St. Lawrence River, Quebec. Canadian Field-Naturalist 114:628-635.
134. SAR 1. Water Fluctuation Impacts on Species At Risk Cornwall to Pointe due Lac [French].
135. SAR 2. Lake Ontario Species at Risk Supplement (Least Bittern and Black Tern Reproductive Index PIs).
136. SAR 3A. Impact of Water Level Regulation on Nearshore Habitat Availability and SAR.
137. SAR 3B. (Supplement) Impact on dunes and SAR.
138. SAR 4. Species at Risk Fish Supplement (Year 4 Modeling Group Report).
139. SAR 5. Lower St. Lawrence Species at Risk Final Report (2005) [French].
140. Sorrell, B. K., I. A. Mendelssohn, K. L. McKee, and R. A. Woods. 2000. Ecophysi- ology of wetland plant roots: A modeling comparison of aeration in relation to species distribution. Annals of Botany 86:675-685.
141. Tessier, C., A. Aubin, and C. Chenevier. 1984. Elevation and distance factors in the structure and productivity of a riverine macrophyte community. Canadian J. Botany 62:2260-2266.
142. Wei, A., and P. Chow-Fraser. 2005. Untangling the confounding effects of ur- banization and high water level on the cover of emergent vegetation in Cootes Paradise Marsh, a degraded coastal wetland of Lake Ontario. Hydrobiologia. 544: 1-9.
143. Wei, A., and P. Chow-Fraser. 2006. Synergistic impact of water-level fluctuation and invasion of Glyceria on Typha in a freshwater marsh of Lake Ontario. Aquat. Bot. (In press).
144. Wei, A., P. Chow-Fraser, and D. Albert. 2004. Influence of shoreline features on fish distribution in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 61: 1113-1123.
145. Wilcox, D. A., J. E. Meeker, and J. Elias. 1993. Impacts of water-level regulation on wetlands of the Great Lakes. Phase 2 Report to Working Committee 2. International Joint Commission Water-levels Reference Study, Ottawa, On- tario. Canada and Washington, DC. USA.
146. Wilcox, D. A., S. I. Apfelbaum, and R. D. Hiebert. 1984. Cattail invasion of sedge meadows following hydrologic disturbance in the cowls Bog Wetland Com- plex, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore. Wetlands 4:115-128.
147. W 1. Wilcox, D. A., K. P. Kowalski, and M. L. Carlson. 2003. Year 3 Report of Relationship between Lake Ontario Water Levels and the Wetlands. Ann Ar- bor, MI: Great Lakes Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey.
148. W 2. Evaluation of Water Level Regulation Influences on Lake Ontario and upper St. Lawrence River Coastal Wetland Plant Communities.
149. BACK 2. St. Lawrence River-Lake Ontario Plan of Study Team. September 1999. Plan of Study for Criteria Review in the Orders of Approval for Regulation of Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Levels and Flows.
150. Clinton Edmonds Associates. 2002. Lake Ontario and St. Lawrence River - Changes in the Institutional Structure and Their Impact on Water Levels, 1950-2001. Report to International Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Study Board. University of Ottawa, Institute of the Environment.
151. Economic Advisory Committee. January 7, 2004. Issues and Findings in the Eco- nomic Analysis of Water Level Management Plans: Consensus Report of the Economics Advisory Committee. Typescript.
152. FEPS 11. Contextual Narrative for "Sediment Budget PI" Lake Ontario and the Upper St. Lawrence River.
153. FEPS 12. Contextual Narrative for Erosion, Flooding, and Existing Shore Protec- tion PIs Lake Ontario and the Upper St. Lawrence River.
154. FEPS 13. Contextual Narrative for "Beach Access" and "Barrier Beaches & Dunes PIs" Lake Ontario and the Upper St. Lawrence River.
155. Gunderson, L. 1999. Resilience, flexibility and adaptive management - antidotes for spurious certitude? Conservation Ecology 3(1): 7. Available on-line at http://www.consecol.org/vol3/ iss1/art7.
156. IERM 4. IERM User's Manual (two versions: a) html version with hyperlinks; and b) text version which is also Attachment B of the descriptive documentation).
157. International Joint Commission. 1956. Order of Approval for Regulation of Lake Ontario. October 29, 1952, as amended by a supplementary Order dated July 2, 1956. Office consolidation. Reprinted in St. Lawrence River-Lake Ontario Plan of Study Team (1999, Annex G).
158. Johnson, B. L. 1999. Introduction to the special feature: Adaptive management- Scientifically sound, socially challenged? Conservation Ecology 3(1): 10. Avail- able on-line at http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss1/art10/.
159. th St., NW Washington, DC 20001.
160. Lee, K. N. 1999. Appraising Adaptive Management. Conservation Ecology 3(2): 3 Available on-line at http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art3. Accessed October 2005.
161. Leger, W. 2005. Position paper on conceptual narratives. Revised draft 22 January 2005; and updated 6/7/05 (LOSLR ftp site).
162. LOSLR (Lake Ontario-St.Lawrence River Study). 2003. Vision, Goals and Guid- ing Principles. Available on-line at http://www.losl.org/about/vision-e.html.
163. NRC (National Research Council). 1999. Downstream: Adaptive Management of Glen Canyon Dam and the Colorado River Ecosystem. Washington, DC: Na- tional Academies Press.
164. NRC. 2004. Adaptive Management for Water Resources Project Planning. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
165. SAR 3A. Impact of Water Level Regulation on Nearshore Habitat Availability and SAR.
166. SAR 3B. (Supplement) Impact on dunes and SAR.
167. Sousounis, P. J. (Ed.). 2002. Special section on the potential impacts of climate change in the Great Lakes Region. Journal of Great Lakes Research 28(4): 493-642.
168. Walters, C. J. 1997. Challenges of Adaptive Management of Riparian and Coastal Ecosystems. Conservation Ecology Available on-line at http://www.consecol.org/ vol1/iss2/art1. Accessed October 2005.