Mechanical behavior of glass ionomer cements as a function of loading condition and mixing procedure

Dental Materials Journal

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 526-533

  Ilie, Nicoleta ^a   Hickel, Reinhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Glass ionomers; Mechanical properties; Mixing systems

Indexed keywords

EID: 35548945307     PISSN: 02874547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.26.526     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Glasspoole EA, Erickson RL, Davidson CL. Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of glass ionomers to enamel. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 454-462.
2. Hunt PR. Glass ionomers: the next generation. A summary of the current situation. J Esthet Dent 1994; 6: 192-194.
3. Mount GJ. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Glass-ionomer cements: past, present and future. Oper Dent 1994; 19: 82-90.
4. Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials -Fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 343-362.
5. Naasan MA, Watson TF. Conventional glass ionomers as posterior restorations. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 1998; 11: 36-45.
6. Mount GJ. Glass ionomers: a review of their current status. Oper Dent 1999; 24: 115-124.
7. Xie D, Brantley WA, Culbertson BM, Wang G. Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2000; 16: 129-138.
8. de Gee AJ, van Duinen RN, Werner A, Davidson CL. Early and long-term wear of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 1613-1619.
9. Cattani-Lorente MA, Godin C, Meyer JM. Mechanical behavior of glass ionomer cements affected by long-term storage in water. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 37-44.
10. Williams JA, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. The comparative strengths of commercial glass-ionomer cements with and without metal additions. Br Dent J 1992; 172: 279-282.
11. Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Kramer N. Viscous glass-ionomer cements: a new alternative to amalgam in the primary dentition? Quintessence Int 1997; 28: 667-676.
12. Frencken JE, Taifour D, Van't Hof MA. Survival of ART and amalgam restorations in permanent teeth of children after 6.3 years. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 622-626.
13. Burgess J, Norling B, Summit J. Resin ionomer restorative materials: the new generation. J Esthet Dent 1994; 6: 207-215.
14. Sidhu SK, Watson TF. Resin-modified glass ionomer materials. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 1995; 8: 59-67.
15. ISO 4049 : 1988 + Technische Korrektur 1 : 1992, Deutsche Fassung EN 24049 : 1993: Zahnheilkunde, Füllungskunstsftoffe.
16. SJ Schneider. Engineered materials handbook, ASM International, USA, 1991, pp.703-707.
17. Weihull W. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech 1951; 18: 290-293.
18. Nomoto R, Komoriyama M, McCabe JF, Hirano S. Effect of mixing method on the porosity of encapsulated glass ionomer cement. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 972-978.
19. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 864-881.