Does harm minimisation lead to greater experimentation? Results from a school smoking intervention trial

Drug and Alcohol Review

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 605-613

  Hamilton, Greg ^a,b,d   Cross, Donna ^b   Resnicow, Ken ^c   Shaw, Therese ^b  

^a CANTERBURY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD   (New Zealand)

^b EDITH COWAN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d CANTERBURY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Adolescent; Harm minimisation; Intervention study; School; Smoking

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; AUSTRALIA; CLINICAL TRIAL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HARM REDUCTION; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICE; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HARM REDUCTION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; INTERVENTION STUDIES; MALE; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICES; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WESTERN AUSTRALIA;

EID: 35449006586     PISSN: 09595236     EISSN: 14653362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09595230701613585     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Ministry of Health. Tobacco trends 2006: monitoring tobacco use in New Zealand. Wellington: Ministry of Health, 2006.
2. White V, Hayman J. Smoking behaviours of Australian secondary students in 2005. Melbourne: The Cancer Council Victoria, 2006.
3. Office on Smoking and Health. Cigarette use among high school students-United States, 1991-2005. MMWR 2006;55:724-6. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/ preview/mmwrhtml/mm5526a2.htm (accessed 4 April 2007).
4. Evans RI, Rozelle RM, Mittlemark MB, Hansen WB, Bane AL, Havis J. Deterring the onset of smoking in children: knowledge of immediate psychological effects and coping with peer pressure, media pressure, and parent modelling. J Appl Soc Psychol 1978;8:126-35.
5. Bruvold WH. A meta-analysis of adolescent smoking programs. Am J Public Health 1993;83:872-80.
6. Dusenbury L, Falco M, Lake A. A review of the evaluation of 47 drug abuse prevention curricula available nationally. J School Health 1997;67:127-32.
7. Tobler NS, Roona MR, Ochshorn P, Marshall DG, Streke AV, Stackpole KM. School-based adolescent drug prevention programs: 1998 meta-analysis. J Prim Prev 2000;20:275-336.
8. Skara S, Sussman S. A review of 25 long-term adolescent tobacco and other drug use prevention program evaluations. Prev Med 2003;37:451-74.
9. Cuijpers P, Jonkers R, de Weerdt I, de Jong A. The effects of drug abuse prevention at school: the 'Healthy School and Drugs' project. Addiction 2002;97:67-73.
10. Murray DM, Pirie P, Luepker RV, Pallonen U. Five- and six- year follow-up results from four seventh grade smoking prevention strategies. J Behav Med 1989;12:207-18.
11. Peterson AV, Kealey KA, Mann SL, Marek PM, Sarason IG. Hutchinson smoking prevention project: long-term randomised trial in school-based tobacco use prevention- results on smoking. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1979-91.
12. Borland R, Scollo M. Opportunities for harm minimisation in tobacco control. Drug Alcohol Rev 1999;18:345-53.
13. McCormick R, Sellman D, Robinson G. Where to next with tobacco smokers?. NZ Med J 2006;119:1238. Available at: http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/119-1238/ 2084/ (accessed 27 March 2007).
14. Gray N, Henningfield J. Dissent over harm reduction for tobacco. Lancet 2006;368:899-901.
15. Gray N, Henningfield JE. A long-term view of harm-reduction. Nicotine Tob Res 2004;6:759-64.
16. Phillips CV, Guenzel B, Bergen P. Deconstructing anti-harm-reduction metaphors; mortality risk from falls and other traumatic injuries compared to smokeless tobacco use. Harm Reduct J 2006;3:15.
17. Single E. Defining harm reduction. Drug Alcohol Rev 1995;14:287-90.
18. Cotton P. Harm reduction approach may be middle ground. JAMA 1994;271:1641-5.
19. Hatsukami DK, Slade J, Benowitz NL, et al. Reducing tobacco harm: research challenges and issues. Nicotine Tob Res 2002;4:S89-101.
20. Hughes JR. Applying harm reduction to smoking. Tob Control 1995;4:S33-8.
21. Hughes JR. Harm-reduction approaches to smoking. The need for data. Am J Prev Med 1998;15:78-9.
22. Warner KE. Tobacco harm reduction: promise and perils. Nicotine Tob Res 2002;4(Suppl. 2):S61-71.
23. Choi WS, Farkas AJ, Pierce JP, Berry CC, Gilpin EA. Which adolescent experimenters progress to established smoking in the United States. Am J Prev Med 1997; 13:385-91.
24. Choi WS, Gilpin EA, Farkas AJ, Pierce JP. Determining the probability of future smoking among adolescents. Addiction 2001;96:313-23.
25. Lenton S, Midford R. Clarifying harm reduction. Drug Alcohol Rev 1996;15:411-13.
26. MacCoun RJ. Toward a psychology of harm reduction. Am Psychol 1998;53:1199-208.
27. Rodu B, Godshall WT. Tobacco harm reduction: an alternative cessation strategy for inveterate smokers. Harm Reduct J 2006;3:37. DOI:10.1186/1477-7517- 3-37.
28. Sussman S. School-based tobacco use prevention and cessation: where are we going? Am J Health Behav 2001; 25:191-9.
29. Hamilton G, Cross D, Resnicow K. Occasional cigarette smokers: cue for harm reduction smoking education. Addict Res 2000;8:419-37.
30. Resnicow K, Smith M, Harrison L, Drucker E. Correlates of occasional tobacco and marijuana use: are teens harm reducing? Addict Behav 1999;24:251-66.
31. Hamilton G, Cross D, Resnicow K, Hall M. A school-based harm minimisation smoking intervention trial: outcome results. Addiction 2005;100:689-700.
32. McLennan B. Socio-economic indexes for areas 96. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1998.
33. World Health Organisation (WHO). Promoting health through schools. The World Health Organisation's Global School Health Initiative. Geneva: WHO, 1996.
34. Levy S, Vaughan BL, Knight JR. Office-based intervention for adolescent substance abuse. Pediatr Clin North Am 2002;49:329-43.
35. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: Guilford Press, 1991.
36. Hamilton G, O'Connell M, Cross D. Adolescent smoking cessation: development of a school nurse intervention. J School Nurs 2004;8:169-74.
37. Hill D, White V, Effendi Y. Changes in the use of tobacco among Australian secondary students: results of the 1999 prevalence study and comparisons with earlier years. Aust NZ J Public Health 2002;26:156-63.
38. Bachman JG, Johnson LD, O'Malley PM. Monitoring the future: a continuing study of the lifestyles and values of youth, 1994 (computer file). Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research (producer and distributor), 1996.
39. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall, 1991.
40. Murray DM. Design and analysis of group-randomised trials. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
41. Rasbash J, Browne W, Goldstein H, et al. A users guide to MlwiN, version 2.1. London: Multilevel Models Project, University of London, 2000.
42. Yang M, Goldstein H, Heath A. Multilevel models for repeated binary outcomes: attitudes and voting over the electoral cycle. J Roy Stat Soc 2000;163:49-62.
43. Snijders T, Bosker R. Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage Publications, 1999.
44. Goldstein H. Multilevel statistical models. London: Edward Arnold, 1995.
45. McBride N, Farringdon F, Midford R, Meuleners L, Phillips M. Harm minimisation in school drug education: final results of the School Health and Alcohol Harm Reduction Project (SHAHRP). Addiction 2004;99: 278-91.
46. Midford R, Munro G, McBride N, Snow D, Ladzinski U. Principles that underpin effective school-based drug education. J Drug Educ 2002;32:363-86.
47. Munro G, Midford R. 'Zero tolerance' and drug education in Australian schools. Drug Alcohol Rev 2001;20:105-9.
48. Resnicow K, Botvin G. School-based substance use prevention programs: why do effects decay? Prev Med 1993; 22:484-90.
49. Rosenbaum M. Safety first: a reality-based approach to teens, drugs, and drug education. San Francisco: The Lindesmith Center, 1999.
50. Shiffman S, Gitchell JG, Warner KE, Slade J, Henningfield JE, Pinney JM. Tobacco harm reduction: conceptual structure and nomenclature for analysis and research. Nicotine Tob Res 2002;4(Suppl. 2):S113-29.
51. Pierce JP. Harm reduction or harm maintenance? Nicotine Tob Res 2002;4(Suppl. 2):S53-54.
52. MacCoun RJ. What harm reduction is and isn't. Am Psychol 1999;54:843-44.
53. Drucker E. Drug prohibition and public health: 25 years of evidence. Public Health Rep 1999;114:14-29.
54. Pentz MA, Sussman S, Newman T. The conflict between least harm and no-use tobacco policy for youth: ethical and policy implications. Addiction 1997;92:1165-73.
55. Bonomo Y, Bowes G. Putting harm reduction into an adolescent context. J Paediatr Child Health 2001;37:5-8.
56. Jemmott JB, Jemmott LS, Fong GT. Abstinence and safer sex HIV risk-reduction interventions for African American adolescents: a randomised control trial. JAMA 1998;279:1529-36.
57. Roche AM. Harm reduction and smoking among indigenous Australians. Drug Alcohol Rev 1997;16:91-3.
58. Wodak A, Saunders B. Harm reduction means what I chose it to mean. Drug Alcohol Rev 1995;14:269-71.
59. School Drug Education Project. Drug Education K-12 Teacher Support Package. Perth: School Drug Education Project, 1999.
60. Population Health Division Department of Health, Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer Anti-Cancer Council of Victoria. Cigarette consumption among Western Australian school students in 1999. Perth: Department of Health, 2002.