Systematics of North American Froelichia (Amaranthaceae subfam. Gomphrenoideae) II: Phylogeny and biogeographic speciation patterns inferred from nrITS sequence data

Brittonia

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 275-289

  McCauley, Ross A ^a,b   Ballard Jr , Harvey E ^a  

^a OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES EN ECOSISTEMAS Y SUSTENTABILIDAD   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Amaranthaceae; Froelichia; Gomphrenoideae; ITS; Phylogeny; Phylogeography

Indexed keywords

AMARANTHACEAE; FROELICHIA; FROELICHIA ARIZONICA; FROELICHIA DRUMMONDII; FROELICHIA FLORIDANA; FROELICHIA GRACILIS; FROELICHIA INTERRUPTA; FROELICHIA LATIFOLIA; FROELICHIA TEXANA; FROELICHIA XANTUSII;

EID: 35448998502     PISSN: 0007196X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1663/0007-196X(2007)59[275:SONAFA]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Akaike, H. 1974. A new look at the statistic model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19: 716-723.
2. Archie, J. W. 1989. Homoplasy excess ratios: New indices for measuring levels of homoplasy in phylogenetic systematics and a critique of the consistency index. Systematic Zoology 38: 253-269.
3. Baldwin, B. G., M. J. Sanderson, J. M. Porter, M. F. Wojciechowski, C. S. Campbell & M. J. Donoghue. 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: A valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 247-277.
4. Ballard, H. E., Jr. & K. J. Sytsma. 2000. Evolution and biogeography of the woody Hawaiian Violets (Viola, Violaceae): Arctic origins, herbaceous ancestry, and bird dispersal. Evolution 54: 1521-1532.
5. _ & R. R. Kowal. 1998. Shrinking the violets: Phylogenetic relationships of infrageneric groups in Viola (Violaceae) based on internal transcribed spacer DNA sequences. Systematic Botany 23: 439-458.
6. Beiera, B.-A., J. A. A. Nylanderb, M. W. Chasec & M. Thulina. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships and biogeography of the desert plant genus Fagonia (Zygophyllaceae), inferred by parsimony and Bayesian model averaging. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 33: 91-108.
7. Borsch, T. & T. M. Pedersen. 1997. Restoring the generic rank of Hebanthe Martius (Amaranthaceae). Sendtnera 4: 13-31.
8. Briggs, D. & S. M. Walters. 1969. Plant Variation and Evolution. McGraw-Hill, New York.
9. Carr, W. R. 2002. No Place But Texas: An annotated list of plant taxa endemic to the Lone Star State (Incomplete working draft). The Nature Conservancy of Texas, San Antonio.
10. Clevinger, J. A., C. K. McMullen, C. C. Clevinger & S. M. Bernacki. 2001. A preliminary phylogenetic study of Alternanthera Forssk. (Amaranthaceae) in the Galapagos Islands. The Virginia Journal of Science 52: 95-96.
11. Correll, D. S. & M. C. Johnston. 1970. Manual of the Vascular Plants of Texas. Texas Research Foundation, Renner.
12. Davidson, R. A. & R. A. Dunn. 1966. A new biometric approach to systematic problems. BioScience 16: 528-536.
13. _ & _. 1967. A correlation approach to certain problems of population-environment relations. American Journal of Botany 54: 529-538.
14. _ & _. 1968. Computer simulation of certain forms of evolutionary change: A preliminary report. Taxon 17: 3-10.
15. Dunn, R. A. & R. A. Davidson. 1968. Pattern recognition in biologic classification. Pattern Recognition 1: 75-93.
16. Edwards, K., C. Johnstone & C. Thompson. 1991. A simple and rapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 19: 1349.
17. Eliasson, U. H. 1971. Amaranthaceae. Pp. 184-207. In: I. L. Wiggins & D. M. Porter (eds.), Flora of the Galapagos Islands. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
18. _. 2004. The evolutionary patterns of the plant family Amaranthaceae on the Galapagos and Hawaiian Islands. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 131: 105-109.
19. Farris, J. S. 1989. The retention index and homoplasy excess. Systematic Zoology 38: 406-407.
20. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits of phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
21. Ferrusquía-Villafranca, I. 1993. Geology of Mexico: A synopsis. Pp. 3-107. In: T. P. Ramammoorthy, R. Bye, A. Lot & J. Fa (eds.), Biological Diversity of Mexico: Origins and Distribution. Oxford University Press, New York.
22. Hellenes, J. & M. A. Téllez-Duarte. 2002. Paleontological evidence of the Campanian to Early Paleocene paleogeography of Baja California. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 186: 61-80.
23. Johnston, M. C. 1963. Past and present grasslands of southern Texas and northeastern Mexico. Ecology 44: 456-466.
24. 4 photosynthesis. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164: 959-986.
25. Kluge, A. G. & J. S. Farris. 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Systematic Zoology 18: 1-32.
26. Kolli, S. 1967. Biochemical and floral anatomical studies in the genus Froelichia (Amaranthaceae). Ph.D. Dissertation. The Catholic University of America, Washington.
27. Lanoue, K. Z., P. G. Wolf, S. Browning & E. E. Hood. 1996. Phylogenetic analysis of restriction-site variation in wild and cultivated Amaranthus species (Amaranthaceae). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 93: 722-732.
28. Li, W. 1997. Molecular Evolution. Sinauer Assoc, Inc., Sunderland.
29. Marchioretto, M. S., P. G. Windisch & J. C. de Siqueira. 2002. Os gêneros Froelichia Moench e Froelichiella R.E. Fries (Amaranthaceae) no Brasil. Pesquisas-Botânica, São Leopoldo 52: 7-46.
30. _ & _ 2004. Padrões de distribuição geográfica das espécies de Froelichia Moench e Froelichiella R.E. Fries (Amaranthaceae) no Brasil. Iheringia, Série Botânica, Porto Alegre 59: 149-159.
31. Maddison, D. R. 1991. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most-parsimonious trees. Systematic Zoology 40: 315-328.
32. McCauley, R. A. 2002a. Toward a preliminary phylogeny of the American Gomphrenoideae (Amaranthaceae): Morphology and ITS2 sequences. Meeting Abstracts, Botany 2002, Madison.
33. _. 2002b. Systematics of the genus Froelichia in North America (Amaranthaceae subfamily Gomphrenoideae). Ph.D. Dissertation. Ohio University, Athens.
34. _. 2003. Froelichia. Pp. 443-447. In: Flora of North America Committee (eds.), Flora of North America north of Mexico, Vol. 4. Oxford University Press, New York.
35. _. 2004. New taxa and a new combination in the North American species of Froelichia (Amaranthaceae). Systematic Botany 29: 64-76.
36. McCauley, R. A. & H. E. Ballard, Jr. 2002. Inferring nativity and biogeographic affinities of central and marginal populations of Froelichia floridana (Amaranthaceae) from inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 129: 311-325.
37. _ & _. 2007. Systematics of North American Froelichia (Amaranthaceae subfam. Gomphrenoideae) I: Identification of consistent morphological variation and segregation of species complexes. Brittonia 59: 255-274.
38. Morrell, P. L., J. M. Porter & E. A. Friar. 2000. Inter-continental dispersal: The origin of the widespread South American plant species Gilia laciniata (Polemoniaceae) from a rare California and Oregon coastal endemic. Plant Systematics and Evolution 224: 13-32.
39. Müller, K. & T. Borsch. 2005a. Phylogenetics of Amaranthaceae based on matK/trnK sequence data-evidence from parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian analyses. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 92: 66-102.
40. _ & _. 2005b. Multiple origins of a unique pollen feature: Stellate pore ornamentation in Amaranthaceae. Grana 44: 266-281.
41. Nason, J. D., J. L. Hamrick & T. H. Fleming. 2002. Historical vicariance and postglacial colonization effects on the evolution of genetic structure in Lophocereus, a sonoran desert columnar cactus. Evolution 56: 2214-2226.
42. Olmstead, R. G. B., B. Bremer, K. M. Scott & J. D. Palmer. 1993. A parsimony analysis of the Asteridae sensu lato based on rbcL sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 700-722.
43. Peinado, M., F. Alcaraz, J. Delgadillo & I. Aguado. 1994. Fitogeografía de la península de Baja California, México. Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid 51: 255-277.
44. Polanco, C., A. I. Gonzalez, A. de la Fuente & G. A. Dover. 1998. Multigene family of ribosomal DNA in Drosophila melanogaster reveals contrasting patterns of homogenization for IGS and ITS spacer regions: A possible mechanism to resolve this paradox. Genetics 149: 243-256.
45. Porter, D. M. 1983. Vascular plants of the Galapagos: Origins and dispersal. Pp. 33-96. In: R. I. Bowman, M. Berson & A. E. Leviton (eds.), Patterns of Evolution in Galapagos Organisms. Pacific Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco.
46. Posada, D. & K. A. Crandall. 1998. Modeltest: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
47. _ & T. Buckley. 2004. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: Advantages of akaike information criterion and bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Systematic Biology 53: 793-808.
48. Pratt, D. B. 2003. Phylogeny and Morphological Evolution of the Chenopodiaceae-Amaranthaceae Alliance. Ph.D. Thesis. Iowa State University, Ames.
49. Rzedowski, J. 1978. La Vegetación de México. Limusa, México.
50. Riddle, B. R., D. J. Hafner, L. F. Alexander & J. R. Jaeger. 2000. Cryptic vicariance in the historical assembly of a Baja California peninsular desert biota. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97: 14438-14443.
51. Sánchez-del Pino, I. 2001. Sistemática del Género Tidestromia Standi. (Amaranthaceae). Tesis Maestro en Ciencias. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México.
52. _, T. Borsch & T. J. Motley. 2004. Phylogenetic analysis of Gomphrenoideae (Amaranthaceae): Sequence data from trnL-F support a Tidestromia-Alternanthera clade. Meeting Abstracts, Botany 2004, Snowbird.
53. _ & _. 2005. Combined analysis of the subfamily Gomphrenoideae (Amaranthaceae) using rpl16 and trnL-F data. Meeting Abstracts, XVII International Botanical Congress, Vienna.
54. Sang, T. 1995. New measurements of distribution of ho moplasy and reliability of parsimonious cladograms. Taxon 44: 77-82.
55. Standley, P. C. 1917. Amaranthaceae. Pp: 95-169. In: J. H. Barnhart & N. L. Britton (eds.), North American Flora, Vol 21, Pt. 2. The New York Botanical Garden, New York.
56. Stebbins, G. L. 1950. Variation and Evolution in Plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
57. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Ver. 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
58. Thompson, J. D., D. G. Higgins & T. J. Gibson. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignments through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22: 4673-4680.
59. Thorne, R. F. 1993. Phytogeography of North America North of Mexico. Pp. 132-153. In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee (eds.), Flora of North America north of Mexico, Vol. 1, Introduction. Oxford University Press, New York.
60. Townsend, C. C. 1993. Amaranthaceae. Pp. 70-91. In: K. Kubitzki, (ed.), Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
61. Wassom, J. J. & P. J. Tranel. 2005. Amplified fragment length polymorphism-based genetic relationships among weedy Amaranthus species. Journal of Heredity 96: 410-416.
62. White, T. J., T. Birns, S. Lee & J. Taylor. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. Pp. 315-322. In: M. Innis, D. Gelfand, J. Snisky & T. White (eds.), PCR protocols: A guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, San Diego.
63. Wiggins, I. L. 1980. Flora of Baja California. Stanford Universtiy Press, Stanford.
64. Wynd, F. L. 1944. The geologic and physiographic background of the soils in the Lower Rio Grande Valley, Texas. The American Midland Naturalist 32: 200-235.
65. Xu, F. & M. Sun. 2001. Comparative analysis of phylogenetic relationships of grain amaranths and their wild relatives (Amaranthus; Amaranthaceae) using internal transcribed spacer, amplified fragment length polymorphism, and double-primer fluorescent intersimple sequence repeat markers. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 21: 372-387.
66. Zharkikh, A. 1994. Estimation of evolutionary distances between nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 39: 315-329.