Multiple origins of a unique pollen feature: Stellate pore ornamentation in Amaranthaceae

Grana

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 266-282

  Müller, Kai ^a   Borsch, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; EVOLUTION; ORNAMENTATION; POLLEN;

AMARANTHACEAE; INSECTA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; PSEUDOPLANTAGO; PSILOTRICHUM;

EID: 32044458605     PISSN: 00173134     EISSN: 16512049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00173130500477787     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (49)

1. Akaike, H. 1974. A new look at the statistic model identification. - IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr. 19: 716-723.
2. APG, 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. - Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 141: 399-436.
3. Borsch, T. 1995. Three new combinations in Pfaffia (Amaranthaceae) from the New World tropics. - Novon 5: 230-233.
4. Borsch, T. 1998. Pollen types in the Amaranthaceae. Morphology and evolutionary significance. - Grana 37: 129-142.
5. Borsch, T. & Barthlott, W. 1998. Structure and evolution of metareticulate pollen. - Grana 37: 68-78.
6. Borsch, T. & Pedersen, T. M. 1997. Restoring the generic rank of Hebanthe Martius (Amaranthaceae). - Sendtnera (München) 4: 13-31.
7. Bremer, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstructions. - Evolution 42: 795-803.
8. Bremer, K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. - Cladistics 10: 295-304.
9. rd ed. - R. Bot. Cards, Kew.
10. Cavaco, A. 1962. Les Amaranthaceae de l'Afrique au sud du tropique du Cancer et de Madagascar. - Mém. Mus. Natl Hist. Nat. B Sér. 13: 1-251.
11. Cronquist, A. & Thorne, R. F. 1994. Nomenclatural and taxonomic history. - In: Caryophyllales. Evolution and systematics (ed. H. D. Behnke & T. J. Mabry), pp. 5-25. - Springer, Berlin.
12. Cuénoud, P., Savolainen, V., Chatrou, L., Powell, M., Grayer, R. J. & Chase, M. 2002. Mol. phylogenetics of Caryophyllales based on nuclear 18S rDNA and plastid rbcL, atpB, and matK DNA sequences. - Am. J. Bot. 89: 132-144.
13. Downie, S. R., Katz-Downie, D. S. & Cho, K. Y. 1997. Relationships in the Caryophyllales as suggested by phylogenetic analyses of partial chloroplast DNA ORF2280 homolog sequences. - Am. J. Bot. 84: 253-273.
14. Doyle, J. A., Bygrave, P. & Le Thomas, A. 2000. Implications of molecular data for pollen evolution in Annonaceae. In: Pollen and spores: Morphology and biology (ed. M. M. Harley, C. M. Morton, & S. Blackmore), pp. 259-284. - R. Bot. Gards, Kew.
15. Eliasson, U. H. 1988. Floral morphology and taxonomic relations among the genera of Amaranthaceae in the New World and the Hawaiian Islands. - Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 96: 235-283.
16. Hilu, K. W., Borsch, T., Müller, K., Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., Savolainen, V., Chase, M., Powell, M., Alice, L. A., Evans, R., Sauquet, H., Neinhuis, C., Slotta, T. A., Rohwer, J. G., Campbell, C. S. & Chatrou, L. 2003. Angiosperm phylogeny based on matK sequence information. - Am. J. Bot. 90: 1758-1776.
17. 4 photosynthesis. - Int. J. Plant Sci. 164: 959-986.
18. Leach, G. J., Townsend, C. C. & Harley, M. M. 1993. Omegandra, a new genus of Amaranthaceae from Australia. - Kew Bull. 48: 787-793.
19. Livingstone, D. A. 1972. The pollen morphology of African Amaranthaceae. - In: 3rd Ann. Meet. AASP (American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists), Toronto 1970. Proc. & Abstr. (ed. B. F. Perkins), p. 132. - Geosci. Man 4. USL, Baton Rouge LA.
20. Livingstone, D. A., Tomlinson, M., Friedman, G. & Broome, R. 1973. Stellate pore ornamentation in pollen grains of the Amaranthaceae. - Pollen Spores 15: 345-351.
21. Löhne, C. & Borsch, T. 2005. Phylogenetic utility and molecular evolution of the petD group II intron in basal angiosperms. - Mol. Biol. Evol. 22: 317-332.
22. Maddison, W. P. 1990. A method for testing the correlated evolution of two binary characters: are gains and losses concentrated on certain branches of a phylogenetic tree? - Evolution 44: 539-557.
23. Maddison, W. P. 2000. Testing character correlation using pairwise comparisons on a phylogeny. - J. Theor. Biol. 202: 195-204.
24. Maddison, W. P. & Maddison, D. R. 1992. MacClade. - Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
25. Mishler, B. D. 1994. The cladistic analysis of Mol. and morphological data. - Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 94: 143-156.
26. Müller, J. & Müller, K. 2003. QuickAlign: A new alignment editor. - Pl. Mol. Biol. Rep. 21: 5.
27. Müller, J. & Müller, K. 2004. TreeGraph: automated drawing of complex tree figures using an extensible tree description format. - Mol. Ecol. Notes 4: 786-788.
28. Müller, K. 2004. PRAP - computation of Bremer support for large data sets. - Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31: 780-782.
29. Müller, K. 2005. SeqState -primer design and sequence statistics for phylogenetic DNA data sets. - Appl. Bioinform. 4: 65-69.
30. Müller, K. & Borsch, T. 2005. Phylogenetics of Amaranthaceae based on matK/trnK sequence data - evidence from parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian analyses. - Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 92: 96-102.
31. Nixon, K. C. 1996. WINCLADA. - Software Auth. distrib.: www.cladistics.com.
32. Nixon, K. C. 1999. The Parsimony Ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. - Cladistics 15: 407-414.
33. Nowicke, J. W. 1994. Pollen morphology and exine ultrastructure. - In: Caryophyllales. Evolution and systematics (ed. H. D. Behnke & T. J. Mabry), pp. 168-221. - Springer, Berlin.
34. Pickett, K. M. & Randle, C. P. 2005. Strange bayes indeed: uniform topological priors imply non-uniform clade priors. - Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 34: 203-211.
35. Posada, D. & Crandall, K. A. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. - Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
36. Pratt, D. B. 2003. Phylogeny and morphological evolution of the Chenopodiaceae-Amaranthaceae alliance. - Ph.D. Thes., Iowa St. Univ., Ames IA.
37. Punt, W., Blackmore, S., Nilsson, S. & Le Thomas, A. 1994 Glossary of pollen and spores terminology - LPPF Ser. 1.LPP Found., Utrecht.
38. Rodman, J. E. 1994. Cladistic and phenetic studies. - In: Caryophyllales. Evolution and systematics (ed. H. D. Behnke & T. J. Mabry), pp. 279-301. - Springer, Berlin.
39. Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J. P. 2003. Mr Bayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. - Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574.
40. Schinz, H. 1934. Amaranthaceae. - In: Die natürlichen Pflanzen-familien. 2nd amend, ed. Bd. 16c (ed. A. Engler & K. Prantl contd. H. Harms), pp. 7-85, 46 figs & 585-586. - W. Engelmann, Leipzig.
41. Simmons, M. P. & Miya, M. 2004. How meaningful are Bayesian support values? - Mol. Biol. Evol. 21: 188-199.
42. Simmons, M. P. & Ochoterena, H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. - Syst. Biol. 49: 369-381.
43. Skvarla, J. J. & Nowicke, J. W. 1976. Ultrastructure of pollen exine in centrospermous families. - Pl. Syst. Evol. 126: 55-78.
44. Suzuki, Y., Glazko, G. V. & Nei, M. 2002. Overcredibility of molecular phylogenetics obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. - Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 99: 16138-16143.
45. Swofford, D. L. 1998. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other Methods). - Sinauer Assoc., Sunderland.
46. Townsend, C. C. 1978. Notes on Amaranthaceae. 4. The genera Dasysphaera and Volkensinia. - Kew Bull. 33: 417-419.
47. Townsend, C. C. 1979. Notes on Amaranthaceae. 8. The generic position of Centema stefanii Chiov. - Kew Bull. 34: 237-238.
48. Townsend, C. C. 1993. Amaranthaceae. - In: Families and genera of vascular plants Vol. 2 (ed. K. Kubitzki, J. G. Rohwer & V. Bittrich), pp. 70-91. - Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg.
49. Wodehouse, R. 1935. Pollen grains, their structure, identification and significance in science and medicine. - McGraw-Hill., New York.