AAB and ABA renewal as a function of the number of extinction trials in conditioned taste aversion

Psicologica

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 129-150

  Rosas, Juan M ^a   García Gutiérrez, Ana ^a   Callejas Aguilera, José E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JAÉN   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35448986187     PISSN: 02112159     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bouton, M. E. (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 80-99.
2. Bouton, M. E. (1994). Context, ambiguity, and classical conditioning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 49-53.
3. Bouton, M. E. (1997). Signals for whether versus when an event will occur. In M. S. Fanselow & M. E. Bouton, M. E. Learning, motivation, and cognition: The functional behaviorism of Robert C. Bolles, (385-409). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
4. Bouton, M. E., & King, D. A. (1983). Contextual control of the extinction of conditioned fear: Tests for the associative value of the context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 9, 248-265.
5. Bouton, M. E., & Ricker, S. T. (1994). Renewal of extinguished responding in a second context. Animal Learning & Behavior, 22, 317-324.
6. Bouton, M. E., & Swartzentruber, D. (1986). Analysis of the Associative and Occasion-Setting Properties of Context Participating in a Pavlovian Discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 12(4), 333-350.
7. Brooks, D. C., & Bouton, M. E. (1994). A retrieval cue for extinction attenuates response recovery (renewal) caused by a return to the conditioning context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 366-379.
8. Brooks, D. C., Bowker, J. L., Anderson, J. E., & Palmatier, M. I. (2003). Impact of bried or extended extinction of a taste aversion on inhibitory associations: Evidence from summation, retardation and preference tests. Learning and Behavior, 31, 69-84.
9. Calton, J. L., Mitchell, K. G., & Schachtman, T. R. (1996). Conditioned inhibition produced by extinction of a conditioned stimulus. Learning & Motivation, 27, 335-361.
10. Chelonis, J. J., Calton, J. L., Hart, J. A., & Schachtman, T. R. (1999). Attenuation of the renewal effect by extinction in multiple contexts. Learning & Motivation, 30, 1-14.
11. Darby, R. J., & Pearce, J. M. (1995). Effects of context on responding during a compound stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 143-154.
12. Denniston, J. C., Chang, R. C., & Miller, R. R. (2003). Massive extinction treatment attenuates the renewal effect. Learning and Motivation, 34, 68-86.
13. Estes, W. K. (1976). Structural aspects of associative models of memory. In C. N. Cofer (Ed.), The structure of human memory (pp. 31-53). New York: Freeman.
14. Goddard, M. J. (1999). Renewal to the signal value of an unconditioned stimulus. Learning and Motivation, 30, 15-34.
15. Gunther, L. M., Denniston, J. C., & Miller, R. R. (1998). Conducting exposure treatment in multiple contexts can prevent relapse. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 36, 75-91.
16. Harris, J. A., Jones, M. L., Bailey, G. K., & Westbrook, R. F. (2000), Contextual control over conditioned responding in an extinction paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 174-185.
17. Jiang, Y., & Leung, A. W. (2005). Implicit learning of ignored visual context. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 100-106.
18. Larrauri, J. A., & Schmajuk, N. A. (submitted). Attentional- associative theory of classical conditioning: Extinction, spontaneous recovery, renewal, and reinstatement.
19. Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298.
20. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1985). Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 159-188.
21. Nakajima, S., Tanaka, S., Urushihara, K., & Imada, H. (2000). Renewal of extinguished lever-press responses after return to the training context. Learning and Motivation, 31, 416-431.
22. Nelson, J. B. (2002). Context specificity of excitation and inhibition in ambiguous stimuli. Learning and Motivation, 33, 284-310.
23. Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. (G. V. Anrep, trans.). London: Oxford University Press.
24. Pearce, J. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61-73.
25. Rauhut, A. S., Thomas, B. L., & Ayres, J. J. B. (2001). Treatments that weaken Pavlovian conditioned fear and thwart its renewal in rats: Implications for treating human phobias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27, 99-114.
26. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. R. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning, Vol. 2: current research and theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
27. Rosas, J. M., & Bouton, M. E. (1996). Spontaneous recovery after extinction of a conditioned taste aversion. Animal Learning and Behavior, 24, 341-348.
28. Rosas, J. M., & Bouton, M. E. (1997). Additivity of the effects of retention interval and context change on latent inhibition: Toward resolution of the context forgetting paradox. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 283-294.
29. Rosas, J. M., & Bouton, M. E. (1998). Context change and retention interval have additive, rather than interactive, effects after taste aversion extinction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 79-83.
30. Rosas, J. M., & Callejas-Aguilera, J. E. (2007). Acquisition of a conditioned taste aversion becomes context dependent when it is learned after extinction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 9-15.
31. Tamai, N., & Nakajima, S. (2000). Renewal of formerly conditioned fear in rats after extensive extinction training. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 13, 137-146.
32. Thomas, B. L., & Ayres, J. J. B. (2004). Use of the ABA fear renewal paradigm to assess the effects of extinction with co-present fear inhibitors or excitors: Implications for theories of extinction and for treating human fears and phobias. Learning and Motivation, 35, 22-52.
33. Thomas, B. L., Larsen, N., & Ayres, J. J. B. (2003). Role of context similarity in ABA, ABC, and AAB renewal paradigms: Implications for theories of renewal and for treating human phobias. Learning and Motivation, 34, 410-436.
34. Van Hamme, L. J., & Wasserman, E. A. (1994). Cue competition in causality judgements: the role of nonpresentation of compound stimulus elements. Learning and Motivation, 25, 127-151.
35. Wagner, A. R., & Brandon, S. E. (1989). Evolution of a structured connectionist model of pavlovian conditioning (AESOP). In Klein, S. B. & Mowrer, R. R. (Eds.), Contemporary learning theories (pp. 149-189). New Jersey: LEA.