Hybridization and introgression in a mixed population of the intertidal seaweeds Fucus evanescens and F. serratus

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 2322-2333

  Coyer, J A ^a   Hoarau, G ^a   Stam, W T ^a   Olsen, J L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Fucus distichus; Fucus evanescens; Fucus serratus; Hybrid zones; Hybridization; Introduced species; Introgression; Seaweeds

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPLAST DNA;

DNA; HERMAPHRODITE; HYBRID; HYBRIDIZATION; INTERTIDAL COMMUNITY; INTRODUCED SPECIES; INTROGRESSION; SEAWEED;

ARTICLE; FUCUS; GENETICS; HYBRIDIZATION; SEAWEED;

DNA, CHLOROPLAST; FUCUS; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; SEAWEED;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; DENMARK; EURASIA; EUROPE; KATTEGAT; NORTH SEA; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA;

FUCUS; FUCUS DISTICHUS; FUCUS EVANESCENS; FUCUS SERRATUS;

EID: 35448980848     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01411.x     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Arnold, M.L. 1997. Natural Hybridization and Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
2. Arnold, M.L. Hodges, S.A. 1995. Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents? Trends Ecol. Evol. 10 : 67 71.
3. Arrontes, J. 1993. Nature of the distributional boundary of Fucus serratus on the north shore of Spain. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 93 : 183 193.
4. Barton, N. Bengtsson, B.O. 1986. The barrier to genetic exchange between hybridising populations. Heredity 57 : 357 376.
5. Barton, N.H. Hewitt, G.M. 1985. Analysis of hybrid zones. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16 : 113 148.
6. Barton, N.H. Hewitt, G.M. 1989. Adaptation, speciation and hybrid zones. Nature (Lond.) 341 : 497 503.
7. TM pour la genetique des populations. Laboratoire Genome et populations, Montpellier, France.
8. Berger, R., Malm, T. Kautsky, L. 2001. Two reproductive strategies in Baltic Fucus vesiculosus (Phaeophyceae). Eur. J. Phycol. 36 : 265 273.
9. Berthier, P., Excoffier, L. Ruedi, M. 2006. Recurrent replacement of mtDNA and cryptic hybridization between two sibling bat species Myotis myotis and Myotis blythii. Proc. R. Soc. B. 273 : 3101 3109.
10. Bierne, N., Borsa, P., Daguin, C., Jollivet, D., Viard, F., Bonhomme, F. David, P. 2003. Introgression patterns in the mosaic hybrid zone between Mytilus edulis and M. galloprovincialis. Mol. Ecol. 12 : 447 461.
11. Billard, E., Serrão, E., Pearson, G.A., Engel, C.R., Destombe, C. Valero, M. 2005. Analysis of sexual phenotype and prezygotic fertility in natural populations of F. spiralis, F. vesiculosus (Fucaceae, Phaeophyceae) and their putative hybrids. Eur. J. Phycol. 40, 397 407.
12. Bull, C.M. 1991. Ecology of parapatric distributions. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22 : 19 36.
13. Burrows, E.M. Lodge, S.M. 1953. Culture of Fucus hybrids. Nature (Lond.) 172 : 1009 1010.
14. Charlesworth, D. 2002. Plant sex determination and sex chromosomes. Heredity 88 : 94 101.
15. Charlesworth, D. Wright, S.I. 2001. Breeding systems and genome evolution. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11 : 685 690.
16. Clarke, B., Johnson, M.S. Murray, J. 1996. Clines in the genetic distance between two species of island land snails: how 'molecular leakage' mislead us about speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 351 : 773 784.
17. Coleman, M.A. Brawley, S.H. 2005. Are life history characteristics good predictors of genetic diversity and structure? A case study of the intertidal alga Fucus spiralis (Heterokontophyta; Phaeophyceae). J. Phycol. 41 : 753 762.
18. Coyer, J.A., Peters, A.F., Hoarau, G., Stam, W.T. Olsen, J.L. 2002a. Hybridisation of the marine seaweeds, Fucus serratus and F. evanescens (Heterokontophyta; Phaeophyceae) in a century-old zone of secondary contact. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 269 : 1829 1834.
19. Coyer, J.A., Peters, A.F., Hoarau, G., Stam, W.T. Olsen, J.L. 2002b. Inheritance patterns of ITS1, chloroplasts, and mitochondria in artificial hybrids of the marine rockweeds, Fucus serratus and F. evanescens (Heterokontophyta; Fucaceae). Eur. J. Phycol. 37 : 173 178.
20. Coyer, J.A., Veldsink, J.H., Stam, W.T. Olsen, J.L. 2002c. Characterization of microsatellite loci in the marine rockweeds, Fucus serratus and F. evanescens (Heterokontophyta; Fucaceae). Mol. Ecol. Notes 2 : 35 37.
21. Coyer, J.A., Peters, A.F., Stam, W.T. Olsen, J.L. 2003. Post-Ice Age recolonization and differentiation of Fucus serratus L. (Fucaceae: Phaeophyta) populations in Northern Europe. Mol. Ecol. 12 : 1817 1829.
22. Coyer, J.A., Hoarau, G., Oudot-Le Secq, M.-P., Stam, W.T. Olsen, J.L. 2006a. A mtDNA-based phylogeny of the brown algal genus Fucus (Heterokontophyta; Phaeophyta). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 39 : 209 222.
23. Coyer, J.A., Hoarau, G., Pearson, G., Serrão, E., Stam, W.T. Olsen, J.L. 2006b. Convergent adaptation to a marginal habitat by homoploid hybrids and polyploid ecads in the seaweed genus Fucus. Biol. Lett. 2 : 405 408.
24. Coyer, J.A., Hoarau, G., Skage, M., Stam, W.T. Olsen, J.L. 2006c. Origin of Fucus serratus (Heterokonotophyta; Fucaceae) populations on Iceland and The Faroes: a microsatellite-based assessment. Eur. J. Phycol. 41 : 235 246.
25. Coyne, J.A. Orr, H.A. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA.
26. Daguin, C., Bonhomme, F. Borsa, P. 2001. The zone of sympatry and hybridization of Mytilus edulis and M. galloprovincialis, as described by intron length polymorphism at locus mac-1. Heredity 86 : 342 354.
27. Denny, M.W. Shibata, M.F. 1989. Consequences of surf-zone turbulence for settlement and external fertilization. Am. Nat. 134 : 859 889.
28. Dudgeon, S., Kübler, J.E., Wright, W.A., Vadas, R.L. Petraitis, P.S. 2001. Natural variability in zygote dispersal of Ascophyllum nodosum at small spatial scales. Funct. Ecol. 15 : 595 604.
29. Engel, C.R., Brawley, S., Edwards, K.J. Serrão, E. 2003. Isolation and cross-species amplification of microsatellite loci from the fucoid seaweeds Fucus vesiculosus, F. serratus, and Ascophyllum nodosum (Heterokontophyta, Fucaceae). Mol. Ecol. Notes 3 : 180 182.
30. Engel, C.R., Daguin, C. Serrão, E. 2005. Genetic entities and mating system in hermaphroditic Fucus spiralis and its close dioecious relative F. vesiculosus (Fucaceae, Phaeophyceae). Mol. Ecol. 14 : 2033 2046.
31. Gard, M. 1910. Sur un hybride de Fucus platycarpus et Fucus ceranoides. C R Acad Sci III 151 : 888 890.
32. Gardner, J.P.A. 1997. Hybridization in the sea. Adv. Mar. Biol. 31 : 1 65.
33. Gosling, E.M. 1992. Systematics and geographic distribution of Mytilus. In : The Mussel Mytilus : Ecology, Physiology Genetics and Culture (E. M. Gosling, ed. pp. 1 20. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
34. Hamrick, J.L. Godt, M.J.W. 1997. Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. In : Plant Life Histories: Ecology, Phylogeny, and Evolution (J. Silvertown, J. L. Harper M. Franco, eds pp. 112 118. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
35. Harrison, R.G. 1990. Hybrid zones: windows on evolutionary process. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 7 : 69 128.
36. Harrison, J.S. Burton, R.S. 2005. Tracing hybrid incompatibilities to single amino acid substitutions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23 : 559 564.
37. Harrison, R.G. Rand, D.M. 1989. Mosaic hybrid zones and the nature of species boundaries. In : Speciation and its Consequences (D. Otte J. A. Endler, eds pp. 111 133. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, USA.
38. Hewitt, G.M. 1989. The subdivision of species by hybrid zones. In : Speciation and its Consequences (D. Otte J. A. Endler, eds pp. 85 110. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, USA.
39. Hoarau, G., Coyer, J.A., Stam, W.T. Olsen, J.L. 2007. A fast and inexpensive DNA extraction/purification method for brown macroalgae. Mol. Ecol. Notes 7 : 191 193.
40. Hoarau, G., Coyer, J.A., Veldsink, J.H., Stam, W.T. Olsen, J.L. in press. Glacial refugia and recolonization patterns in the brown seaweed Fucus serratus. Mol. Ecol.
41. Holsinger, K.E. 2000. Reproductive systems and evolution in vascular plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97 : 7037 7042.
42. Lein, T.E. 1984. Hybrider mellom sagtang (Fucus serratus L.) og gjelvtang (Fucus distichus subsp. edentatus (Pyl.) Powell) i indre Oslofjord. Blyttia 42 : 71 77.
43. Levitan, D.R., Sewall, M.A. Chia, F.S. 1992. How distribution and abundance influence fertilization success in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus franciscanus. Ecology 73 : 248 254.
44. Lowe, A., Harris, S. Ashton, P. 2004. Ecological Genetics: Design, Analysis, and Application. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
45. Lüning, K. 1990. Seaweeds: Their Environment, Biogeography and Ecophysiology. John Wiley, NY, USA.
46. Mallet, J. 2005. Hybridization as an invasion of the genome. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20 : 229 237.
47. Mathieson, A.C., Dawes, C.J., Wallace, A. Klein, A.S. 2006. Distribution, morphology, and genetic affinities of dwarf embedded Fucus populations from the Northwest Atlantic Ocean. Bot. Mar. 49 : 283 303.
48. Moore, W.S. 1977. An evaluation of narrow hybrid zones in vertebrates. Quart. Rev. Biol. 52 : 263 267.
49. Müller, D.G. Gassman, G. 1984. Sexual reproduction and the role of sperm attractants in monoecious species of the brown algae order Fucales (Fucus, Hesperophycus, Pelevita, and Pelvetiopsis). Journal of Plant Physiology 118 : 401 408.
50. Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89 : 583 590.
51. Nielsen, E.E.G., Bach, L.A. Kotlicki, P. 2006. hybridlab (version 1.0): a program for generation simulated hybrids from population samples. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6 : 971 973.
52. Orr, H.A., Masly, J.P. Presgraves, D.C. 2004. Speciation genes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 14 : 675 679.
53. Pearson, G. Brawley, S. 1996. Reproductive ecology of Fucus distichus (Phaeophyceae): an intertidal alga with successful external fertilization. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 143 : 211 223.
54. Pearson, G., Serrão, E.A. Brawley, S. 1998. Control of gamete release in fucoid algae: sensing hydrodynamic conditions via carbon acquisition. Ecology 79 : 1725 1739.
55. Pennington, J.T. 1985. The ecology of fertilization of echinoid eggs: the consequences of sperm dilution, adult aggregation, and synchronous spawning. Biol. Bull. 169 : 417 430.
56. Perrin, C., Daguin, C., van de Vliet, M., Engel, C.R., Pearson, G. Serrão, E.A. 2007. Implications of mating system for genetic diversity of sister algal species: Fucus spiralis and Fucus vesiculosus (Heterokontophyta, Phaeophyceae). Eur. J. Phycol. in press.
57. Powell, H.T. 1957. Studies in the genus Fucus L. I. Fucus distichus L. emend. Powell. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. UK 36 : 407 432.
58. Pritchard, J.K., Stephens, P. Donnelly, P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155 : 945 959.
59. Rieseberg, L.H. 1998. Molecular ecology of hybridization. In : Advances in Molecular Ecology (G. R. Carvalho, ed. pp. 243 265. IOS Press, Amsterdam.
60. Rieseberg, L.H. Ellstrand, N.C. 1993. What can morphological and molecular markers tell us about plant hybridization? Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 12 : 213 241.
61. Sauvageau, C. 1909. Sur l'hybride des Fucus vesiculosus et Fucus serratus. Comptes Rendus de la Société de Biologie, Paris 67 : 832 833.
62. Schueller, G.H. Peters, A.F. 1994. Arrival of Fucus evanescens (Phaeophyceae) in Kiel Bight (Western Baltic). Bot. Mar. 37 : 471 477.
63. Scott, G.W. Hardy, F.G. 1994. Observations of the occurrence of hybrids between two sympatric species of fucoid algae. Cryptogamie. Algol. 15 : 297 305.
64. Serrão, E.A., Pearson, G., Kautsky, L. Brawley, S. 1996. Successful external fertilization in turbulent environments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93 : 5286 5290.
65. Serrão, E.A., Kautsky, L., Lifvergren, T. Brawley, S. 1997. Gamete dispersal and pre-recruitment mortality in Baltic Fucus vesiculosus. Phycologia Suppl. 36 : 101 102.
66. Serrão, E.A., Alice, L.A. Brawley, S.H. 1999. Evolution of the Fucaceae (Phaeophyceae) inferred from nrDNA-ITS. J. Phycol. 35 : 382 394.
67. Stebbins, G.L. 1950. Variation and Evolution in Plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
68. Stomps, T.J. 1911. Etudes topographiques sur la variabilité de Fucus vesiculosus L. platycarpus Thur., et ceranoides L. Recueil de l'Institut Botanique ''Leo Errera'', Bruxelles 8 : 326 377.
69. Taylor, E.B., Boughman, J.W., Groenenboom, M., Sniatynski, M., Schluter, D. Gow, J.L. 2006. Speciation in reverse: morphological and genetic evidence of the collapse of a three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) species pair. Mol. Ecol. 15 : 343 355.
70. Vähä, J.-P. Primmer, C.R. 2006. Efficiency of model-based Bayesian methods for detecting hybrid individuals under different hybridization scenarios and with different numbers of loci. Mol. Ecol. 15 : 63 72.
71. Vernet, P. Harper, J.L. 1980. The cost of sex in seaweeds. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 13 : 129 138.
72. Wallace, A., Klein, A.S. Mathieson, A.C. 2004. Determining the affinities of salt marsh fucoids using microsatellite markers: evidence of hybridization and introgression between two species of Fucus (Phaeophyta) in a Maine estuary. J. Phycol. 40 : 1013 1027.
73. Weir, B.S. Cockerham, C.C. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38 : 1358 1370.
74. Wikström, S.A., von Wachenfeldt, T. Kautsky, L. 2002. Establishment of the exotic species Fucus evanescens C. Ag. (Phaeophyceae) in Øresund, Southern Sweden. Bot. Mar. 45 : 510 517.
75. Wirtz, P. 1999. Mother species-father species: unidirectional hybridization in animals with female choice. Anim. Behav. 58 : 1 12.
76. Wright, S. 1969. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Vol. 2. The Theory of Gene Frequencies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
77. Wu, C.-I. 2001. The genetic view of speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 14 : 851 865.
78. Wu, C.-I. Ting, C.-T. 2004. Genes and speciation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5 : 114 122.