Assessing Dispositions: Context and Questions

New Educator

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 57-72

  Diez, Mary E ^a  

^a ALVERNO COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35448956625     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15499243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15476880500486137     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Alverno College Faculty. 1994. Student assessment-as-learning at Alverno College, Milwaukee, WI: Alverno Institute.
2. American Board for Certification of Teacher Excellence (2005). Passport to teaching certification brochure http://www.abcte.org/pdfs/ABCTEbrochure.pdf (http://www.abcte.org/pdfs/ABCTEbrochure.pdf) (Accessed: 18 July 2005).
3. Bartussek, D., 1972. “ Disposition ”. In Encyclopedia of psychology, Edited by: Eysenck, H. J., Arnold, W., and Meili, R., 282New York: Herder and Herder.
4. Cartwright, D. D., and Blacklock, K. K., Teacher work samples and struggling readers: Impacting student performance and candidate dispositions. American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education Annual Meeting. New Orleans. Paper presented at the
5. Delandshere, G., 1996. From static and prescribed to dynamic and principled assessment of teaching. Elementary School Journal, 97 (2): 105–120. [CSA]
6. Delandshere, G., and Arens, S. A., 2003. Examining the quality of the evidence in preservice teacher portfolios. Journal of Teacher Education, 54 (1): 57–73. [CROSSREF][CSA]
7. Delandshere, G., and Petrosky, A. R., 1994. Capturing teacher’s knowledge: Performance assessment. a and post-structuralist epistemology, b) from a post-structuralist perspective, c) and post-structuralism, d) none of the above. Educational Researcher, 23 (5): 11–18. [CSA]
8. Delandshere, G., and Petrosky, A. R., 1998. Assessment of complex performance: Limitations of key measurement assumptions. Educational Researcher, 27 (2): 14–24. [CSA]
9. Delandshere, G., and Petrosky, A. R., 1999. It is also possible to quantify colors but that is not the point: A rejoinder to Brookhart. Educational Researcher, 28 (3): 28–30. [CSA]
10. Diez, M. E., 2006. “ Assessing dispositions: Five principles to guide practice ”. In Teacher dispositions: Building a teacher education framework of moral standards, Edited by: Sockett, H., 49–68. Washington, DC: AACTE.
11. Diez, M. E., Finch, M. E., Lasley, T., and Tom, A., You want dispositions? I’ll give you dispositions! The Norma Rae syndrome in teacher education. Major symposium at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. Washington, D.C.
12. Dottin, E., 2006. “ A Deweyan approach to the development of moral dispositions in professional teacher education communities ”. In Teacher dispositions: Building a teacher education framework of moral standards, Edited by: Sockett, H., 27–47. Washington, DC: AACTE.
13. Gallup Organization. TeacherInsight Program http://education.gallup.com/content/default.asp?ci=868 (http://education.gallup.com/content/default.asp?ci=868) (Accessed: 29 July 2005).
14. Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium. 1992. Model standards for beginning teacher licensure and development: A resource for state dialogue, Washingon, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
15. Lamson, S. L., Aldrich, J. E., and Thomas, K. R., Using social inquiry strategies to enhance candidate dispositions. Association of Teacher Educators Annual Meeting. Jacksonville, FL. Paper presented at the
16. Lang, W. S., Analysis of disposition measures of consistency with INTASC principles: Results of an initial study. Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. Washington, D.C.
17. McClelland, D. C., 1978. Guide to behavioral event interviewing, Boston: McBer and Company.
18. McCombs, B. L., Defining tools for teacher reflection: The assessment of learner-centered practices. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago. Paper presented at the
19. Moss, P. A., 1996. Enlarging the dialogue in educational measurement: Voice from interpretive research traditions. Educational Researcher, 25 (1): 20–28. [CSA]
20. Moss, P. A., and Schutz, A., 2001. Educational standards, assessment, and the search for consensus. American Educational Research Journal, 38 (1): 37–70. [CSA]
21. Mullin, D., 2003. Developing a framework for the assessment of teacher candidate dispositions, ERIC microfiche. ED 479255
22. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. 1989. What teachers should know and be able to do, Detroit: Author.
23. National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education. 2002. Professional standards for the accreditation of schools, colleges, and departments of education, Washington, D.C.: Author.
24. Shepard, L. A., 2000. The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29 (7): 4–14. [CSA]
25. State of Connecticut, Department of Education (2005). Beginning educator support and training (BEST) program http://www.state.ct.us/sde/dtl/t-a/ (http://www.state.ct.us/sde/dtl/t-a/) (Accessed: 29 July 2005).
26. Sockett, H., 2006. “ Character, rules, and relations ”. In Teacher dispositions: Building a teacher education framework of moral standards, Edited by: Sockett, H., 9–25. Washington, DC: AACTE.
27. Stiggens, R. J., 2002. Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83 (10): 758–765. [CSA]
28. Uhlenbeck, A. M., Verloop, N., and Beijaard, D., 2002. Requirements for an assessment procedure for beginning teachers: Implications from recent theories on teaching and assessment. Teachers College Record, 104 (2): 242–272. [CROSSREF][CSA]
29. Vonnegut, K., 1971. Happy birthday, Wanda June, New York: Delta Books.
30. Wilkerson, J. R., Measuring dispositions with credibility: A multi-institutional perspective. Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. Washington, D.C.
31. Wilkerson, J. R., and Lang, W. S., Measuring dispositions with practicality, utility, validity and reliability in mind. Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. Washington, D.C.
32. Wolf, D., Bixby, J., Glenn, J., and Gardner, H., 1991. “ To use their minds well: Investigating new forms of student assessment ”. In Review of Research in Education, Edited by: Grant, G., Vol. 17, 31–74. Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association.