Shared assumptions: Semantic minimalism and Relevance Theory

Journal of Linguistics

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 647-681

  Wedgwood, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35448954845     PISSN: 00222267     EISSN: 14697742     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022226707004793     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Atlas, Jay David. 2005. Logic, meaning and conversation: Semantical underdeterminacy, implicature, and their interface. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Atlas, Jay David. To appear. How insensitive can you be? Meanings, propositions, context, and semantical underdeterminacy. In Preyer & Peter (eds.).
3. Bezuidenhout, Anne. 2006. The coherence of contextualism, Mind and Language 21(1), 1-10.
4. Blakemore, Diane. 1992. Understanding utterances: An introduction to pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.
5. Borg, Emma. To appear. Minimalism versus contextualism. in semantics. In Preyer & Peter (eds.).
6. Breheny, Richard. 2005. Some scalar implicatures really aren't quantity implicatures - but some's are. In Emar Maier, Conen Bary & Janneke Huitink (eds.), Proceedings of SuB9, 57-71. Nijmegen: Nijmegen Centre for Semantics.
7. Cappelen, Herman & Ernie [Ernest] Lepore. 2005. Insensitive semantics: A defense of semantic minimalism and speech act pluralism. Oxford: Blackwell.
8. Cappelen, Herman & Ernest Lepore. 2006a. Shared content. In Ernest Lepore & Barry C. Smith (eds.), Oxford handbook of philosophy of language, 1020-1055. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Cappelen, Herman & Ernie [Ernest] Lepore. 2006b. Replies. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73(2), 469-492.
10. Cappelen, Herman & Ernie [Ernest] Lepore. 2006c. Response. Mind and Language 21(1), 50-73.
11. Cappelen, Herman & Ernie [Ernest] Lepore. 2007. Relevance theory and shared content. In Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.), Pragmatics, 115-135. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
12. Carston, Robyn. 1985. A reanalysis of some 'quantity implicatures'. Ms., University College London.
13. Carston, Robyn. 1988. Language and cognition. In Frederick Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey, vol. III, 38-68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Carston, Robyn. 1998. Informativeness, relevance and scalar implicature. In Robyn Carston & Seiji Uchida (eds.), Relevance Theory: Applications and implications, 179-236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
15. Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford : Black well.
16. Carston, Robyn. 2004. Explicature and semantics. In Steven Davis & Brendan S. Gillon (eds.), Semantics: A reader, 817-845. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Carston, Robyn. 2006. Linguistic communication and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. University College London Working Papers in Linguistics 18, 37-69.
18. Carston, Robyn. To appear. Linguistic communication and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Synthese.
19. Geurts, Bart. 1998. Scalars. In Petra Ludewig & Bart Geurts (eds.), Lexikalische Semantik aus kognitiver Sicht, 95-118. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
20. Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.), Speech acts (Syntax and Semantics 3), 41-58. New York: Academic Press.
21. [Reprinted in H. P. Grice, 1989. Studies in the way of words, 22-40. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press].
22. Gross, Steven. 2006. Can one sincerely say what one doesn't believe? Mind and Language 21(1), 11-20.
23. Horn, Laurence. 1972. On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA. [Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1976].
24. Horn, Laurence. 1992. The said and the unsaid, Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 40: Proceedings of SALT II, 163-192.
25. Kadmon, Nirit. 2001. Formal pragmatics: Semantics, pragmatics, presupposition, and focus. Maiden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.
26. Korta, Kepa & John Perry. 2006. Varieties of minimalist semantics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73(2), 451-459.
27. Larson, Richard & Gabriel Segal. 1995. Knowledge of meaning: An introduction to semantic theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. MacKenzie, Ian. 2002. Paradigms of reading: Relevance theory and deconstruction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
29. Montminy, Martin. 2006. Semantic content, truth conditions and context. Linguistics and Philosophy 29(1), 1-26.
30. Preyer, Gerhard & Georg Peter (eds.). To appear. Context- sensitivity and semantic minimalism: New essays on semantics and pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell. [2nd edn., 1995.]
32. Stanley, Jason & Zoltán Gendler Szabó. 2000. On quantifier domain restriction. Mind and Language 15(2-3), 219-261.
33. Travis, Charles. 2006. Insensitive semantics. Mind and Language 21(1), 39-49.
34. Wedgwood, Daniel. 2005. Shifting the focus: From static structures to the dynamics of interpretation. Amsterdam & Oxford : Elsevier.
35. Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber. 2004. Relevance Theory. In Laurence Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 607-632. Oxford: Blackwell.