Abnormal reliance on object structure in apraxics' learning of novel object-related actions

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 997-1008

  Barde, Laura H F ^a,b   Buxbaum, Laurel J ^a,c   Moll, Adrienne D ^a  

^a MOSS REHABILITATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; APRAXIA; ASSOCIATION; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CODING; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GESTURE; HUMAN; INFORMATION STORAGE; LEARNING DISORDER; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; OBJECT RELATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VISION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; APRAXIA, IDEOMOTOR; FEMALE; GESTURES; HUMANS; LEARNING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); STROKE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 35448946717     PISSN: 13556177     EISSN: 14697661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1355617707070981     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (49)

1. Bekkering, H. & Neggers, S.F.W. (2002). Visual search is modulated by action intentions. Psychological Science, 13, 370-374.
2. Buccino, G., Vogt, S., Ritzl, A., Fink, G.R., Zilles, K., Freund, H.J., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). Neural circuits underlying imitation learning of hand actions: An event-related fMRI study. Neuron, 42, 323-334.
3. Buxbaum, L.J. (2001). Ideomotor apraxia: A call to action. Neurocase, 7, 445-458.
4. Buxbaum, L.J., Johnson-Frey, S.H., & Bartlett-Williams, M. (2005a). Deficient internal models for planning hand-object interactions in apraxia. Neuropsychologia, 43, 917-929.
5. Buxbaum, L.J., Kyle, K., & Menon, R. (2005b). On beyond mirror neurons: Internal representations subserving imitation and recognition of skilled object-related actions in humans. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 226-239.
6. Buxbaum, L.J., Kyle, K.M., Tang, K., & Detre, J.M. (2006). Neural substrates of knowledge of hand postures for object grasping and functional object use: Evidence from fMRI. Brain Research, 1117, 175-185.
7. Buxbaum, L.J., Sirigu, A.S., Schwartz, M.F., & Klatsky, R. (2003). Cognitive representations of hand posture in ideomotor apraxia. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1091-1113.
8. Chao, L.L. & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage, 12, 478-484.
9. Clark, M.A., Merians, A.S., Kothari, A., Poizner, H., Macauley, B., & Rothi, L.J.G. (1994). Spatial planning deficits in limb apraxia. Brain, 117, 1093-1106.
10. Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Rizzolatti, G., & Umilta, C. (1999). Action for perception: A motorvisual attentional effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1673-1692.
11. Creem-Regehr, S.H. & Lee, J.N. (2005). Neural representations of graspable objects: Are tools special? Cognitive Brain Research, 22 457-469.
12. DeRenzi, E., Faglioni, P., & Sorgato, P. (1982). Modality-specific and supramodal mechanisms of apraxia. Brain, 105, 301-312.
13. Ellis, R. & Tucker, M. (2000). Micro-affordance: The potentiation of components of action by seen objects. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 451-471.
14. Fagg, A.H. & Arbib, M.A. (1998). Modeling parietal-premotor interactions in primate control of grasping. Neural Networks, 11, 1277-1303.
15. Fiez, J.A., Damasio, H., & Grabowski, T.J. (2000). Lesion segmentation and manual warping to a reference brain: Intra- and inter-observer reliability. Human Brain Mapping, 9, 192-211.
16. Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1998). Neurons responding to the sight of goal-directed hand/arm actions in the parietal area PF (7b) of the macaque monkey. Society of Neuroscience Abstracts, 24, 654.
17. Frey, S.H. (2007). What puts the how in where? Tool use and the divided visual streams hypothesis. Cortex, 43, 368-375.
18. Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Luppino, G., & Murata, A. (1997). A parietal-frontal circuit for hand grasping movements in the monkey: Evidence from reversible inactivation experiements. In P. Their & H.-O. Karnath (Eds.), Parietal lobe contributions to orientation in 3-D space. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
19. Garbarini, F. & Adenzato, M. (2004). At the root of embodied cognition: Cognitive science meets neurophysiology. Brain and Cognition, 56, 100-106.
20. Gerardin, E., Sirigu, A., Lehericy, S., Poline, J., Gaymard, B., Agid, Y., & LeBihan, D. (2000). Partially overlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movements. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 1093-1094.
21. Gibson, J.L. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton and Mifflin.
22. Goldenberg, G. & Hagmann, S. (1998). Tool use and mechanical problem solving in apraxia. Neuropsychologia, 36, 581-589.
23. Goldenberg, G., Hentze, S., & Hermsdorfer, J. (2004). The effect of tactile feedback on pantomime of tool use in apraxia. Neurology, 63 1863-1867.
24. Gonzalez-Rothi, L.J. & Heilman, K.M. (1984). Acquisition and retention of gestures by apraxic patients. Brain & Cognition, 3, 426-437.
25. Grafton, S.T., Fadiga, L., Arbib, M.A., & Rizzolatti, G. (1997): Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. Neuroimage, 6, 231-236.
26. Haaland, K.Y., Harrington, D.L., & Knight, R.T. (2000). Neural representations of skilled movement. Brain, 123, 2306-2313.
27. Hannus, A., Cornelissen; F.W., Lindemann, O., & Bekkering, H. (2005). Selection-for-action in visual research. Acta Psychologica, 118, 171-191.
28. Heilman, K.M. & Gonzalez-Rothi, L.J. (1993). Apraxia. In K.M. Heilman & E. Valenstein (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Heilman, K.M., Gonzalez-Rothi, L.J., & Valenstein, E. (1982). Two forms of ideomotor apraxia. Neurology, 32, 342-346.
30. Hermsdorfer, J., Hentze, S., & Goldenberg, G. (2006). Spatial and kinematic features of apraxic movements depend on the mode of execution. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1642-1652.
31. Mecklinger, A., Gruenewald, C., Weiskopf, N., & Doeller, C.F. (2004). Motor affordance and its role for visual working memory: Evidence from fMRI studies. Experimental Psychology, 51, 258-269.
32. Milner, A.D., Dijkerman, H.C., Pisella, L., Mcintosh, R.D., Tilikete, C., Vighetto, A., & Rossetti, Y. (2001). Grasping the past: Delay can improve visuomotor performance. Current Biology, 11, 1896-1901.
33. Mozaz, M., Rothi, L.G, Anderson, J., Crucian, G.P., & Heilman, K. (2002). Postural knowledge of transitive pantomimes and intransitive gestures. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8 958-962.
34. Murata, A., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Raos, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1997). Object representation in the ventral premotor cortex (area F5) of the monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 78, 2226-2230.
35. Murata, A., Gallese, V., Kaseda, M., & Sakata, H. (1996). Parietal neurons related to memory guided hand manipulation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 75, 2180-2186.
36. Murata, A., Gallese, V., Luppino, G., Kaseda, M., & Sakata, H. (2000). Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. Journal of Neurophysiology, 83, 2580-2601.
37. Norman, J. (2002). Two visual systems and two theories of perception: An attempt to reconcile the constructivist and ecological approaches. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 73-144.
38. Rizzolatti, G. & Fadiga, L. (1998). Grasping objects and grasping action meanings: The dual role of monkey rostroventral premotor cortex (area F5). Novartis Foundation Symposia, 218, 81-95.
39. Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2002). Motor and cognitive functions of the ventral premotor cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 12, 149-154.
40. Rizzolatti, G. & Luppino, G. (2001). The cortical motor system. Neuron, 31, 889-901.
41. Rizzolatti, G. & Matelli, M. (2003). Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: Anatomy and functions. Experimental Brain Research, 153, 146-157.
42. Rorden, C. & Brett, M. (2000). Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behavioral Neurology, 12, 191-200.
43. Schindler, I., Rice, N.J., McIntosh, R.D., Rossetti, Y., Vighetto, A., & Milner, D. (2004). Automatic avoidance of obstacles is a dorsal stream function: Evidence from optic ataxia. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 779-784.
44. Sirigu, A., Cohen, L., Duhamel, J.R., Pillon, B., Dubois, B., & Agid, Y. (1995). A selective impairment of hand posture for object utilization in apraxia. Cortex, 31, 41-55.
45. Symes, E., Ellis, R., & Tucker, M. (2007). Visual object affordances: Object orientation. Acta Psychologica, 124, 238-255.
46. Tucker, M. & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 830-846.
47. Wada, Y., Nakagawa, Y., Nishikawa, T., Aso, N., Inokawa, M., Kashiwagi, A., Tanaba, H., & Takeda, M. (1999). Role of somatosensory feedback from tools in realizing movements by patients with ideomotor apraxia. European Neurology, 41, 73-78.
48. Watson, R.T., Fleet, W.S., Rothi, L.J.G., & Heilman, K.M. (1986). Apraxia and the supplementary motor area. Archives of Neurology, 43 787-792.
49. Young, G. (2006). Are different affordances subserved by different neural pathways? Brain and Cognition, 62, 134-142.