Behavior, Discipline, and Students with Emotional or Behavioral Disorders: Promises to Keep . . . Miles to Go

Behavioral Disorders

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 289-299

  Smith, Carl R ^a   Katsiyannis, Antonis ^b  

^a DRAKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3543140226     PISSN: 01987429     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/019874290402900310     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Bear, G. G. (1999), Interim alternative educational settings: Related research and program considerations. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
2. Board of Education v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 102 S. Ct. 3034, 73 L.Ed., 2d 690 (1982).
3. Children's Behavioral Alliance. (2003). In the best interests of all: A position paper of the Children's Behavioral Alliance, Landover, MD: Children and Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (CHADD).
4. CJN v. Minneapolis Public Schools, 38 IDELR 208 (8th Cir. 2003).
5. Conroy, M. A., Katsiyannis, A., Clark, D., Gable, R. A., & Fox, J. J. (2002). State office of education practices: Implementing the IDEA disciplinary provisions. Behavioral Disorders, 27, 98-108.
6. County of San Diego v. California Special Education Hearing Office, 24 IDELR 756 (9th Cir. 1996).
7. Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District v. Michael F., 23 IDELR 1041 (S.D.Tex. 1995).
8. Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District v. Michael F., 26 IDELR 303 (5th Cir. 1997).
9. Gonzalez v. Puerto Rico Department of Education, 34 IDELR 291 (1st Cir. 2001).
10. Hendrickson, J. M., Smith, C. R., Frank, A.R., & Merical, C. (1998). Decision making factors associated with placement of students with emotional and behavioral disorders in restrictive educational settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 21, 275-302.
11. Hoagwood, K. (2001). Evidence-based practice in children's mental health services: What do we know? Why aren't we putting it to use. Emotional and Behavioral Disorders in Youth, 1, 84-90.
12. Independent School District No. 284 v. A.C., 35 IDELR 59 (8th Cir. 2001).
13. Katsiyannis, A., & Maag, W. J. (1998). Disciplining students with disabilities: Practice considerations for implementing IDEA '97. Behavioral Disorders, 23, 276-289.
14. Katsiyannis, A., & Maag, W. J. (2001). Manifestation determination as a golden fleece. Exceptional Children, 68, 85-96.
15. Katsiyannis, A., & Smith, C. (2003). Disciplining students with disabilities: Legal trends and the issue of interim alternative education settings. Behavioral Disorders, 28, 410-418.
16. Leone, P. E., Mayer, M. J., Malmgren, K., & Meisel, S. M. (2000). School violence and disruption: Rhetoric, reality, and reasonable balance. Focus on Exceptional Children, 33(1), 1-20.
17. Maag, J. W. (1999). Behavior management: From theoretical implications to practical applications. San Diego, CA: Singular.
18. McGinnis, E., Kiraly, J., & Smith, C. R. (1984). The types of data used in identifying public school students as behaviorally disordered. Behavioral Disorders, 9, 239-246.
19. Morrison, G., & D'Incau, B. (2000). Developmental and service trajectories of students with disabilities recommended for expulsion from school. Exceptional Children, 66, 257-272.
20. Neosho R-V School District v. Clark, 38 IDELR 61 (8th Cir. 2003).
21. Palmer, P. J. (1998). The courage to teach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22. Roland M. and Miriam M. v. The Concord School Committee, 16 IDELR 1129 (1st Cir. 1990).
23. Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J. (2001). Assessment (8th ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
24. Sasso, G. M., Conroy, M. A., Stichler, J. P., & Fox, J. J. (2001). Slowing down the bandwagon: The misapplication of functional assessment for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 26, 282-296.
25. Simpson, R. L., & Myles, B. S. (1998, September). Functional behavioral assessment: Where we've been and where we seem to be going. In IDEA Institute Series: Discipline provisions: Positive behavioral supports and beyond. Kansas City, MO: IDEA Institute.
26. Smith, C. R. (1996). Determining eligibility and program appropriateness for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: Questions and some answers. Proceedings of the 17th National Institute on Legal Issues of Educating Individuals with Disabilities. Horsham, PA: LRP Publications.
27. Smith, C. R. (1997). Advocacy for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: One call for redirected efforts. Behavioral Disorders, 22, 96-105.
28. Smith, C. R. (2000). Behavioral and discipline provisions of IDEA 97: Implicit competencies yet to be confirmed. Exceptional Children, 66, 403-412.
29. Smith, C. R. (2003). Meeting the behavioral and discipline needs of students with emotional and behavioral disorders: Are we missing the forest for the trees? Beyond Behavior, 13, 1, 8-11.
30. Smith, C. R., Frank, A. R., & Snider, B. F. (1984). School psychologists' and teachers' perceptions of data used in the identification of behaviorally disordered students. Behavioral Disorders, 10, 27-32.
31. Sugai, G. (1998, August). Primer on functional assessment-based behavior support planning. Paper presented at the Iowa Summer Institute on IDEA '97 Behavioral Programming and Discipline Provisions, Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa.
32. Townsend, B. L. (2000). The disproportionate discipline of African American learners: Reducing school suspensions and expulsions. Exceptional Children, 66, 381-391.
33. Venus Independent School District v. Daniel S., 36 IDELR 185 (N.D.Tex. 2002).
34. Walker, H. M., Colvin, G., & Ramsey, E. (1995). Antisocial behavior in school: Strategies and best practices. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
35. Yell, M. L., & Katsiyannis, A. (2000). Functional behavioral assessment and IDEA '97: Legal and practice considerations. Preventing School Failure, 44, 158-162.
36. Zhang, D., Katsiyannis, A., & Herbst, M. (2003). Disciplinary exclusions in special education: A four-year analysis. Unpublished manuscript, Clemson University, Clemson, SC.