Stochastic modeling of RNA pseudoknotted structures: A grammatical approach

Bioinformatics

Volumn 19, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2003, Pages

  Cai, Liming ^a   Malmberg, Russell L ^b   Wu, Yunzhou ^a  

^a University of Georgia ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOINFORMATICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER MODEL; CONFERENCE PAPER; LINGUISTICS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RNA STRUCTURE; STOCHASTIC MODEL; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; BASE PAIRING; BINDING SITE; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CONFORMATION; EVALUATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; VALIDATION STUDY;

RNA;

ALGORITHMS; BASE PAIRING; BASE SEQUENCE; BINDING SITES; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; NUCLEIC ACID CONFORMATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; RNA; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, RNA; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, NUCLEIC ACID; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 3543069105     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1007     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Akutsu, T. (2000) Dynamic programming algorithms for RNA secondary prediction with pseudoknots. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 104, 45-62.
2. Brown, M.P. (2000) Small subunit ribosomal RNA modeling using stochastic context-free grammars. Proc. Int. Conf. Intel. Syst. Mol. Biol., 56, 57-66.
3. Brown, M. and Wilson, C. (1995) RNA pseudoknot modeling using intersections of stochastic context-free grammars with applications to database search. In Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. pp. 109-125.
4. Cai, L. (1995) Computational complexity of PCGS with regular components. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Development of Language Theory. pp. 209-219.
5. Cai, L. (1996) Computational complexity of linear PCGSs. Computer and Artificial Intelligence, 15, 199-210.
6. Cary, R.B. and Stormo, G.D. (1995) Graph-theoretic approach to RNA modeling using comparative data. In Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Systems in Molecular Biology, pp. 75-80.
7. Chomsky, N. (1956) Three models for the description of languages. IRE Transactions on Information Theory, 2, 113-124.
8. Durbin, R., Eddy, S.R., Krogh, A. and Mitchison, J.G. (1998) BiologicalSequence Analysis: Probabilistic Models of Proteins and Nucleic Acids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
9. Eddy, S.R. and Durbin, R. (1994) RNA sequence analysis using covariance models. Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 2079-2088.
10. Felden, B., Massire, C., Westhof, E., Atkins, J.F. and Gesteland, R.F. (2001) Phylogenetic analysis of tmRNA genes within a bacterial subgroup reveals a specific structural signature. Nucleic Acids Res., 29, 1602-1607.
11. Holmes, I. and Rubin, D.H. (2002) Pairwise RNA structure comparison with stochastic context-free grammars. In Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. pp. 191-203.
12. Knudsen, B. and Hein, J. (1999) RNA secondary structure prediction using stochastic context-free grammars and evolutionary history. Bioinformatics, 15, 446-454.
13. Lyngso, R.B. and Pedersen, C.N.S. (2000) RNA pseudoknot prediction in energy based models. J. Comput. Biol., 7, 409-428.
14. Paillart, J.C., Skripkin, E., Ehresmann, B., Ehresmann, C. and Marquet, R. (2002) In vitro evidence for a long range pseudoknot in the 5′-untranslated and matrix coding regions of HIV-1 genomic RNA. J. Biol. Chem., 277, 5995-6004.
15. Paun, Gh. and Santean, L. (1990) Further remarks on parallel communicating grammar systems. Int. J. Comput. Math., 34, 187-203.
16. Rivas, E. and Eddy, S.R. (1999) A dynamic programming algorithm for RNA structure prediction including pseudoknots. J. Mol. Biol., 285, 2053-2068.
17. Rivas, E. and Eddy, S.R. (2000) The language of RNA: A formal grammar that includes pseudoknots. Bioinformatics, 16, 334-340.
18. Sakakibara, Y., Brown, M., Hughey, R., Mian, I.S., Sjolander, K., Underwood, R.C. and Haussler, D. (1994) Stochastic context-free grammars for tRNA modeling. Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 5112-5120.
19. Searls, D.B. (1992) The linguistics of DNA. American Scientist, 20, 579-591.
20. Searls, D.B. (1999) Formal language theory and biological macromolecules. Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, 47, 117-140.
21. Tabaska, J.E., Cary, R.B., Gabow, H.N. and Stormo, G.D. (1998) An RNA folding method capable of identifying pseudoknots and base triples. Bioinformatics, 8, 691-699.
22. Tanaka, Y., Hori, T., Tagaya, M., Sakamoto, T., Kurihara, Y., Katahira, M. and Uesugi, S. (2002) Imino proton NMR analysis of HDV ribozymes: nested double pseudoknot structure and Mg2+ ion-binding site close to the catalytic core in solution. Nucleic Acids Res., 30, 766-774.
23. Uemura, Y., Hasegawa, A., Kobayashi, Y. and Yokomori, T. (1999) Tree adjoining grammars for RNA structure prediction. Theoretical Computer Science, 210, 277-303.
24. Wu, Y., Cai, L. and Malmberg, R.L. (2003) Implementation improvements to a pseudoknot prediction algorithm. Manuscript.
25. Zuker, M. and Stiegler, P. (1981) Optimal computer folding of large RNA sequences using thermodynamics and auxiliary information. Nucleic Acids Res., 9, 133-148.
26. Zuker, M. (1989) Computer prediction of RNA structure. Meth. Enzymol., 180, 262-288.
27. Zweib, C., Wower, I. and Wower, J. (1999) Comparative sequence analysis of tmRNA. Nucleic Acids Res., 27, 2063-2071.