Peer review: An essential step in the publishing process

Journal of Genetic Counseling

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 183-187

  Weil, Jon ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Genetic counseling; Peer review

Indexed keywords

BACTERIOPHAGE; CAREER; CONSULTATION; DATA ANALYSIS; EVALUATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC COUNSELING; HUMAN GENETICS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEARNING; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL PROFESSION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; SKILL; WRITING;

CALIFORNIA; GENETIC COUNSELING; HUMANS; MANUSCRIPTS; PEER REVIEW; PUBLISHING; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 3543031610     PISSN: 10597700     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:JOGC.0000028252.93942.40     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Bowen, N. K. (2003). How to write a research article for the Journal of Genetic Counseling. J Genet Counsel, 12, 5-21.
2. Jefferson, T., Wager, E., & Davidoff, F. (2002). Measuring the quality of editorial peer review. JAMA, 287, 2786-2790.
3. McConkie-Rosell, A., & Sullivan, J. A. (2002). Editorial. J Genet Counsel, 11, 237-239.
4. McConkie-Rosell, A., & Sullivan, J. A. (2003). Editorial Notes. J Genet Counsel, 12, 1-3.
5. McConkie-Rosell, A., & Sullivan, J. A. (2004). Editorial notes. J Genet Counsel, 13, 179-182.
6. Rennie, D. (2002). Fourth international congress on peer review in biomedical publication. JAMA, 287, 2759-2760.
7. Resta, R. G., & Kim, K. S. (1998). Editorial introduction: New journal features. J Genet Counsel, 7, 131-132.
8. Weber, E. J., Katz, P. P., Waeckerle, J. F., & Callaham, M. L. (2002). Author perception of peer review: Impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction. JAMA, 287, 2790-2793.
9. Weil, J. (2003). Psychosocial genetic counseling in the post-nondirective era: A point of view. J Genet Counsel, 12, 199-211.