-
1
-
-
14544300945
-
-
a) A. R. Carroll, G. Arumugan, R. J. Quinn, J. Redburn, G. Guymer, P. Grimshaw, J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 1889;
-
(2005)
J. Org. Chem
, vol.70
, pp. 1889
-
-
Carroll, A.R.1
Arumugan, G.2
Quinn, R.J.3
Redburn, J.4
Guymer, G.5
Grimshaw, P.6
-
2
-
-
33750030763
-
-
b) P. L. Katavic, D. A. Venables, P. I. Forster, G. Guymer, A. R. Carroll, J. Nat. Prod. 2006, 69, 1295.
-
(2006)
J. Nat. Prod
, vol.69
, pp. 1295
-
-
Katavic, P.L.1
Venables, D.A.2
Forster, P.I.3
Guymer, G.4
Carroll, A.R.5
-
3
-
-
35348963054
-
-
Personal communication from Prof. Anthony Carroll corresponding author on Ref, 1a
-
Personal communication from Prof. Anthony Carroll (corresponding author on Ref. [1a]).
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
0033529014
-
-
M. Williams, E. A. Kowaluk, S. P. Arneric, J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 1481.
-
(1999)
J. Med. Chem
, vol.42
, pp. 1481
-
-
Williams, M.1
Kowaluk, E.A.2
Arneric, S.P.3
-
6
-
-
34547852201
-
-
The exo:endo ratio for the LACDAC reaction of 6 and acetaldehyde varied from about 2:1 to as high as 7:1; D. J. Maloney, S. J. Danishefsky, Heterocycles 2007, 72, 167.
-
The exo:endo ratio for the LACDAC reaction of 6 and acetaldehyde varied from about 2:1 to as high as 7:1; D. J. Maloney, S. J. Danishefsky, Heterocycles 2007, 72, 167.
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
17144424601
-
-
a) R. Sebesta, M. G. Pizzuti, A. J. Boersma, A. J. Minnaard, B. L. Feringa, Chem. Commun. 2005, 1711;
-
(2005)
Chem. Commun
, pp. 1711
-
-
Sebesta, R.1
Pizzuti, M.G.2
Boersma, A.J.3
Minnaard, A.J.4
Feringa, B.L.5
-
12
-
-
24944469869
-
-
b) S. Knapp, C. Yang, S. Pabbaraja, B. Rempel, S. Reid, S. G. Withers, J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 7715;
-
(2005)
J. Org. Chem
, vol.70
, pp. 7715
-
-
Knapp, S.1
Yang, C.2
Pabbaraja, S.3
Rempel, B.4
Reid, S.5
Withers, S.G.6
-
13
-
-
20544440852
-
-
c) R. B. Jagt, J. G. De Vries, B. L. Feringa, A. J. Minnaard, Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2433.
-
(2005)
Org. Lett
, vol.7
, pp. 2433
-
-
Jagt, R.B.1
De Vries, J.G.2
Feringa, B.L.3
Minnaard, A.J.4
-
14
-
-
35348990738
-
-
Reactions after the aldol reaction were carried through as a mixture of epimeric alcohols at C10 until 11.
-
Reactions after the aldol reaction were carried through as a mixture of epimeric alcohols at C10 until 11.
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
0000284024
-
-
For a study and analysis of these mechanistic issues, see for example a
-
For a study and analysis of these mechanistic issues, see for example a) S. Danishefsky, E. Larson, D. Askin, N. Kato, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 1246;
-
(1985)
J. Am. Chem. Soc
, vol.107
, pp. 1246
-
-
Danishefsky, S.1
Larson, E.2
Askin, D.3
Kato, N.4
-
16
-
-
0000202701
-
-
b) S. J. Danishefsky, W. H. Pearson, D. F. Harvey, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 2455;
-
(1984)
J. Am. Chem. Soc
, vol.106
, pp. 2455
-
-
Danishefsky, S.J.1
Pearson, W.H.2
Harvey, D.F.3
-
17
-
-
0005121787
-
-
c) S. J. Danishefsky, W. H. Pearson, D. Harvey, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 2456;
-
(1984)
J. Am. Chem. Soc
, vol.106
, pp. 2456
-
-
Danishefsky, S.J.1
Pearson, W.H.2
Harvey, D.3
-
18
-
-
0003257831
-
-
d) S. Danishefsky, E. R. Larson, D. Askin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 6457;
-
(1982)
J. Am. Chem. Soc
, vol.104
, pp. 6457
-
-
Danishefsky, S.1
Larson, E.R.2
Askin, D.3
-
21
-
-
0000570755
-
-
g) S. Danishefsky, J. F. Kerwin, S. Kobayashi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 358;
-
(1982)
J. Am. Chem. Soc
, vol.104
, pp. 358
-
-
Danishefsky, S.1
Kerwin, J.F.2
Kobayashi, S.3
-
22
-
-
0001283316
-
-
h) S. Danishefsky, N. Kato, D. Askin, J. F. Kerwin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 360.
-
(1982)
J. Am. Chem. Soc
, vol.104
, pp. 360
-
-
Danishefsky, S.1
Kato, N.2
Askin, D.3
Kerwin, J.F.4
-
23
-
-
35349007934
-
-
The relative stereochemistry was determined by extensive 2D NMR analysis; see the Supporting Information for a detailed procedure of the HPLC (chiral support) separation of the enantiomers.
-
The relative stereochemistry was determined by extensive 2D NMR analysis; see the Supporting Information for a detailed procedure of the HPLC (chiral support) separation of the enantiomers.
-
-
-
-
24
-
-
35348935473
-
-
2, -78°C.
-
2, -78°C.
-
-
-
-
25
-
-
35349002718
-
-
A more direct route that involved a cross-metathesis of 18 with methyl or ethyl acrylate was attempted; however, despite a number of different catalysts and reaction conditions being used, only starting material was recovered. Presumably this result is due to the hindered nature of the vinyl group.
-
A more direct route that involved a cross-metathesis of 18 with methyl or ethyl acrylate was attempted; however, despite a number of different catalysts and reaction conditions being used, only starting material was recovered. Presumably this result is due to the hindered nature of the vinyl group.
-
-
-
-
26
-
-
35349012983
-
-
13C spectra of the authentic and synthetic natural products. The accuracy of our polarimeter was verified with commercially available optically pure compounds (R)-(+)-1,1′-bi-2-naphthol and (S)-(-)-4-benzyl-2- oxazolidinone.
-
13C spectra of the authentic and synthetic natural products. The accuracy of our polarimeter was verified with commercially available optically pure compounds (R)-(+)-1,1′-bi-2-naphthol and (S)-(-)-4-benzyl-2- oxazolidinone.
-
-
-
-
27
-
-
35348971356
-
-
At the time that we were planning the closing phases of the total synthesis, the absolute configuration of naturally occurring grandisine A was not known. By happenstance, we first used the R form of 3-hydroxybutyrate, which in turn led to the R aldehyde 16. Ultimately, this was coupled to both, )-15 and, -15. At that stage we had no way of knowing which one would be opportune for merger with (R)-16 to attain the relative configuration of grandisine A. As shown above, coupling with, )-15 led eventually to grandisine A (1, The same sequence of steps starting with, )-15 led to a final product whose 1H NMR spectrum is similar, but clearly different from that of grandisine A. This product is thus assigned the structure, 16-epi-ent-grandisine A, the 1H and 13C spectra of which are provided in the Supporting Information. Hence there can be no doubt that the relative configurati
-
13C spectra of which are provided in the Supporting Information. Hence there can be no doubt that the relative configuration of synthetic 1 corresponds to that of natural grandisine A. It also seems likely (discrepancies in the magnitude of dextrarotation notwithstanding) that the absolute configuration of synthetic 1 also corresponds to that of natural grandisine A.
-
-
-
-
28
-
-
0000785023
-
-
S. E. Denmark, B. R. Henke, E. Weber, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 2512.
-
(1987)
J. Am. Chem. Soc
, vol.109
, pp. 2512
-
-
Denmark, S.E.1
Henke, B.R.2
Weber, E.3
|