Comparison of electrical velocimetry and thermodilution techniques for the measurement of cardiac output

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Volumn 51, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 1314-1319

  Zoremba, N ^a   Bickenbach, J ^a   Krauss, B ^a   Rossaint, R ^a   Kuhlen, R ^b   Schalte G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

^b HELIOS KLINIKUM BERLIN BUCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cardiac output; Electrical velocimetry; PiCCO; Pulmonary artery catheter

Indexed keywords

SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRITICAL ILLNESS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTRODE; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART OUTPUT MEASUREMENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER; THERMODILUTION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CARBON MONOXIDE; CARDIAC OUTPUT; ELECTRICITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; THERMODILUTION;

EID: 35349023241     PISSN: 00015172     EISSN: 13996576     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01445.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ramsey SD, Saint S, Sullivan SD et al. Clinical and economic effects of pulmonary artery catheterization in nonemergent coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anaesth 2000 14 (2 113 8.
2. Awaida JP, Dupuis J, Theroux P et al. Demographics, treatment and outcome of acute coronary syndromes: 17 years of experience in a specialized cardiac centre. Can J Cardiol 2006 22 (2 121 4.
3. Swan HJC, Ganz W, Forrester J et al. Catheterization of the heart in man with use of a flow-directed balloon-tipped catheter. N Engl J Med 1970 283 : 447 51.
4. Boeck JC, Barker BC, MacKersie RC et al. Cardiac output measurements using femoral artery thermodilution in patients. J Crit Care 1989 4 : 106 11.
5. Ostergaard M, Niellsen J, Rasmussen JP, Berthelsen PG. Cardiac output - pulse contour analysis vs. pulmonary artery thermodilution. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006 50 : 1044 9.
6. Goedje O, Hoeke K, Lichtwarck-Aschoff M et al. Continuous cardiac output by femoral arterial thermodilution calibrated pulse contour analysis: comparison with pulmonary arterial thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1999 27 : 2407 12.
7. Sakka SG, Reinhardt K, Meier-Hellmann A. Comparison of pulmonary artery and arterial thermodilution cardiac output in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 1999 25 : 843 6.
8. Sandham JD, Hull RD, Brandt RF et al. A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery-catheters in high-risk surgical patients. N Engl J Med 2003 348 : 5 14.
9. Moshkovitz Y, Kaluski E, Milo O et al. Recent developments in cardiac output determination by bioimpedance: comparison with invasive cardiac output and potential cardiovascular applications. Curr Opin Cardiol 2004 19 : 229 37.
10. Marik P, Pendelton J, Smith R. A comparison of hemodynamic parameters derived from transthoracic electrical bioimpedance with those parameters obtained by thermodilution and ventricular angiography. Chest 1997 25 : 1545 50.
11. Schmidt G, Theilmeier G, Van Aken H et al. Comparison of electrical velocimetry and transoesophageal Doppler echocardiography for measuring stroke volume and cardiac output. Br J Anaesth 2005 95 (5 603 10.
12. Bernstein DP, Osypka MJ. Apparatus and method for determining an approximation of the stroke volume and the cardiac output of the heart. US Patent 6,511,438 B2, January 28, 2003.
13. Hillis LD, Firth BG, Winniford MD. Analysis of factors affecting the variability of Fick versus indicator dilution measurements of cardiac output. Am J Cardiol 1985 56 : 764 8.
14. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986 1 : 307 10.
15. Srinivas M, Roizen MF, Fleisher LA et al. Comparing methods of clinical measurements: reporting standards for Bland and Altman analysis. Anesth Analg 2000 90 : 593 602.
16. Tuman KJ, McCarthy RJ, Spiess BD et al. Effect of pulmonary artery catheterization on outcome in patients undergoing coronary artery surgery. Anesthesiology 1989 70 : 199 206.
17. Connors AF, Speroff T, Dawson NV et al. The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. J Am Med Assoc 1996 276 : 889 97.
18. Critchley LAH, Critchley JAJH. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit 1999 15 : 85 91.
19. Kubicek WG, Karnegis JN, Patterson RP et al. Development and evaluation of an impedance cardiac output system. Aerosp Med 1966 37 : 1208 12.
20. Bernstein DP. A new stroke volume equation for thoracic bioimpedance: theory and rationale. Crit Care Med 1986 14 : 904 9.
21. Tischenko MI. Estimation of stroke volume by integral rheogram of the human body. Sechenov Physiol J 1973 59 : 1216 24.
22. Schuerholz T, Cobas Meyer M, Friedrich L et al. Reliability of continuous cardiac output determination by pulse-contour analysis on porcine septic shock. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006 50 : 407 13.
23. Mayer J, Boldt J, Schöllhorn T et al. Semi-invasive monitoring of cardiac output by a new device using arterial pressure waveform analysis: a comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2007 98 : 176 82.
24. Ostergaard M, Nilsson LB, Nilsson JC et al. Prediction of bolus thermodilution cardiac measurements in patients with atrial fibrillation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005 49 : 366 72.