|
Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 161-168
|
Comparison of 11C-choline-PET/CT and whole body-MRI for staging of prostate cancer
|
Author keywords
11C choline PET CT; MRI; Prostate cancer; Staging
|
Indexed keywords
CHOLINE C 11;
PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;
RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT;
UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;
CARBON;
DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
BONE METASTASIS;
BRAIN METASTASIS;
CANCER STAGING;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
FOLLOW UP;
HUMAN;
LUNG METASTASIS;
LYMPH NODE METASTASIS;
MALE;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY;
PROSTATE CANCER;
REVIEW;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
WHOLE BODY IMAGING;
ARTICLE;
BONE TUMOR;
METASTASIS;
METHODOLOGY;
PATHOLOGY;
PROSTATE TUMOR;
RADIOGRAPHY;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
SCINTISCANNING;
BONE NEOPLASMS;
CARBON RADIOISOTOPES;
HUMANS;
LYMPHATIC METASTASIS;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
MALE;
NEOPLASM METASTASIS;
NEOPLASM STAGING;
POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY;
PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;
|
EID: 35349004770
PISSN: 00295566
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1160/nukmed-0075 Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (79)
|
References (13)
|