Erratum (DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2006.04.015);11C-Choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography for Tumor Localization of Primary Prostate Cancer in Comparison With 12-Core Biopsy

Journal of Urology

Volumn 176, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 954-960

  Martorana, G ^a   Schiavina, R ^a   Corti, B ^a   Farsad, M ^a   Salizzoni, E ^b   Brunocilla, E ^a   Bertaccini, A ^a   Manferrari, F ^a   Castellucci, P ^a   Fanti, S ^a   Canini, R ^b   Grigioni, W F ^a   D'Errico Grigioni, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

biopsy; magnetic resonance imaging; methyl carbon 11 choline; positron emission tomography; prostatic neoplasms

Indexed keywords

CARBON 11; CHOLINE; CARBON; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; TUMOR BIOPSY; TUMOR LOCALIZATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PATHOLOGY; PROSTATE TUMOR;

AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; CARBON RADIOISOTOPES; CHOLINE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33746580540     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.005     Document Type: Erratum

References (18)

1. Onur R., Littrup P.J., Pontes J.E., and Bianco Jr. F.J. Contemporary impact of transrectal ultrasound lesions for prostate cancer detection. J Urol 172 (2004) 512
2. Dhingsa R., Qayyum A., Coakley F.V., Lu Y., Jones K.D., and Swanson M.G. Prostate cancer localization with endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging. effect of clinical data on reader accuracy. Radiology 230 (2004) 215
3. Nakashima J., Tanimoto A., Imai Y., Mukai M., Horiguchi Y., Nakagawa K., et al. Endorectal MRI for prediction of tumor site, tumor size, and local extension of prostate cancer. Urology 64 (2004) 101
4. Cornud F., Flam T., Chauveinc L., Hamida K., Chretien Y., Vieillefond A., et al. Extraprostatic spread of clinically localized prostate cancer. factors predictive of pT3 tumor and of positive endorectal MR imaging examination results. Radiology 224 (2002) 203
5. Wefer A.E., Hricak H., Vigneron D.B., Coakley F.V., Lu Y., Wefer J., et al. Sextant localization of prostate cancer. comparison of sextant biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with step section histology. J Urol 164 (2000) 400
6. Coakley F.V., Qayyum A., and Kurhanewicz J. Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopic imaging of prostate cancer. J Urol 170 (2003) S69
7. De Jong I.J., Pruim J., Elsinga P.H., Vaalburg W., and Mensink H.J. Visualization of prostate cancer with 11C-choline positron emission tomography. Eur Urol 42 (2002) 18
8. Yamaguchi T., Lee J., Uemura H., Sasaki T., Takahashi N., Oka T., et al. Prostate cancer. a comparative study of 11C-choline PET and MR imaging combined with proton MR spectroscopy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 32 (2005) 742
9. Picchio M., Messa C., Landoni C., Gianolli L., Sironi S., Brioschi M., et al. Value of [11C]choline-positron emission tomography for re-staging prostate cancer. a comparison with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography. J Urol 169 (2003) 1337
10. Beyer T., Townsend D.W., Brun T., Kinahan P.E., Charron M., Roddy R., et al. A combined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology. J Nucl Med 41 (2000) 1369
11. Farsad M., Schiavina R., Castellucci P., Nanni C., Corti B., Martorana G., et al. Detection and localization of prostate cancer. correlation of (11)C-choline PET/CT with histopathologic step-section analysis. J Nucl Med 46 (2005) 1642
12. Presti Jr. J.C., O'Dowd G.J., Miller M.C., Mattu R., and Veltri R.W. Extended peripheral zone biopsy schemes increase cancer detection rates and minimize variance in prostate specific antigen and age related cancer rates. results of a community multi-practice study. J Urol 169 (2003) 125
13. Prostate. In: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th ed. Edited by F. L. Greene, D. L. Page, I. D. Fleming, A. G. Fritz, C. M. Balch, D. G. Haller et al. New York: Springer-Verlag, part IX, chapt. 34, pp. 309-316, 2002
14. Montironi R., van der Kwast T., Boccon-Gibod L., Bono A.V., and Boccon-Gibod L. Handling and pathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens. Eur Urol 44 (2003) 626
15. Kundel H.L., and Polansky M. Measurement of observer agreement. Radiology 228 (2003) 303
16. Breeuwsma A.J., Pruim J., Jongen M.M., Suurmeijer A.J., Vaalburg W., Nijman R.J., et al. In vivo uptake of [11C]choline does not correlate with cell proliferation in human prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 32 (2005) 668
17. Sutinen E., Nurmi M., Roivainen A., Varpula M., Tolvanen T., Lehikoinen P., et al. Kinetics of [11C]choline uptake in prostate cancer. a PET study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31 (2004) 317
18. Bott S.R., Young M.P., Kellett M.J., and Parkinson M.C. Contributors to the UCL Hospitals' Trust Radical Prostatectomy Database: Anterior prostate cancer: is it more difficult to diagnose?. BJU Int 89 (2002) 886