Cryptic speciation in the Caesalpinia hintonii complex (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae) in a seasonally dry Mexican forest

Annals of Botany

Volumn 100, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1307-1314

  Sotuyo, Solange ^a   Delgado Salinas, Alfonso ^a   Chase, Mark W ^b   Lewis, Gwilym P ^c   Oyama, Ken ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^b JODRELL LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

^c ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Caesalpinia hintonii complex; Legumes; Mesoamerica; Mexico; Plant phylogeography; Population differentiation; Seasonally dry forest

Indexed keywords

PLANT DNA; SPACER DNA;

ADAPTATION; CRYPSIS; DRY FOREST; ENDEMIC SPECIES; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC VARIATION; LEGUME; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; PLASTID; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ARTICLE; CAESALPINIA; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GEOGRAPHY; MEXICO; PHYLOGENY; PLASTID;

CAESALPINIA; DNA, INTERGENIC; DNA, PLANT; GEOGRAPHY; MEXICO; PHYLOGENY; PLASTIDS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; VARIATION (GENETICS);

CAESALPINIA; CAESALPINIA EPIFANIOI; CAESALPINIA HINTONII; CAESALPINIA LAXA; CAESALPINIA MACVAUGHII; CAESALPINIA MELANADENIA; CAESALPINIOIDEAE; FABACEAE;

EID: 35348988223     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcm213     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Abbott RJ, Smith LC, Milne RI, et al. 2000. Molecular analysis of plant migration and refugia in the Arctic. Science 289: 1343-1346.
2. Austin JD, Lougheed SC, Neidrauer L, Chek AA, Boag PT. 2002. Cryptic lineages in a small frog: the post-glacial history of the spring peeper, Pseudacris crucifer (Anura: Hylidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 25: 316-329.
3. Becerra J, Venable L. 1999. Nuclear ribosomal DNA and its implications for evolutionary trends in Mexican Bursera (Burseraceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 1047-1057.
4. Bruneau A, Forest F, Herendeen PS, Klitgaard BB, Lewis GP. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships in the Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae) as inferred from chloroplast trnL intron sequences. Systematic Botany 26: 487-514.
5. Cabral-Cano E, Lang HR, Harrison CGA. 2000. Stratigraphic assessment of the Arcelia-Teloloapan area, southern Mexico: implications for southern Mexico's post-Neocomian tectonic evolution. American Earth Science 13: 443-457.
6. Caron H, Dumas S, Marque G, Messier C, Bandou E, Petit RJ, et al. 2000. Spatial and temporal distribution of chloroplast DNA polymorphism in a tropical tree species. Molecular Ecology 9: 1089-1098.
7. Chase MW, Hills HG. 1991. Silica gel: an ideal dessicant for preserving field-collected leaves for use in molecular studies. Taxon 40: 215-220.
8. Comes HP, Kadereit JW. 1998. The effect of Quaternary climatic changes on plant distribution and evolution. Trends in Plant Sciences 3: 432-438.
9. Contreras JL. 1991. Contribución al conocimiento del género Caesalpinia (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae) en el estado de Guerrero. BSc Thesis, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM, México.
10. Desmastes JW, Spradling TA, Hafner DJ, Reed DL. 2002. Systematics and phylogeography of pocket gophers in the genera Crarogeomys and Pappogeomys. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 22: 144-154.
11. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. 1987. A rapid isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
12. Dumolin-Lapègue S, Demesure B, Le Corre V, Petit RJ. 1997. Phylogeographic structure of white oaks throughout the European continent. Genetics 146: 1475-1487.
13. Dutech C, Maggia L, Joly HI. 2000. Chloroplast diversity in Vouacapoua americana (Caesalpiniaceae), a Neotropical forest tree. Molecular Ecology 9: 1427-1432.
14. Dynesius M, Jansson R. 2000. Evolutionary consequences of changes in species' geographical distribution driven by Milankovitch climate oscillations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 97: 9115-9120.
15. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
16. Ferrari L, López-Martínez M, Aguirre-Díaz G, Carrasco-Núñez G. 1999. Space-time patterns of Cenozoic arc volcanism in central Mexico: from the Sierra Madre Occidental to the Mexican Volcanic Belt. Geology 27: 303-306.
17. Ferrusquía-Villafranca I. 1993. Geology of Mexico: a synopsis. In: Ramamoorthy AP, Bye R, Lot A, Fa J, eds. Biological diversity in Mexico: origins and distribution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 3-108.
18. Haffer J. 1969. Speciation in Amazonian birds. Science 165: 131-137.
19. Hamilton MB. 1999. Four primer pairs for the amplification of chloroplast intergenic regions with intraspecific variation. Molecular Ecology 8: 521-523.
20. Hansen TF. 1997. Stabilizing selection and the comparative analysis of adaptation. Evolution 51: 1341-1351.
21. Hewitt GM. 1996. Some genetic consequences of ice ages and their role in divergence and speciation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 58: 247-276.
22. Hewitt GM. 2000. The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature 405: 907-913.
23. Hewitt GM. 2001. Speciation, hybrid zones and phylogeography or seeing genes in space and time. Molecular Ecology 10: 537-549.
24. Kelchner SA. 2000. The evolution of noncoding chloroplast DNA and its application in plant systematics. Annals of Missouri Botanical Garden 87: 482-498.
25. King RA, Ferris C. 1998. Chloroplast DNA phylogeography of Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn. Molecular Ecology 7: 1151-1161.
26. Knapp S, Mallet J. 2003. Refuting refugia? Science 300: 71-72.
27. Kropf M, Kadereit JW, Comes HP. 2002. Late Quaternary distributional stasis in the submediterranean mountain plant Anthyllis montana L. (Fabaceae) inferred from ITS sequences and amplified fragment length polymorphism markers. Molecular Ecology 11: 447-463.
28. Lewis GP. 1998. Caesalpinia: a revision of the Poincianella-Erythrostemon Group. London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
29. McDaniel SF, Shaw JA. 2003. Phylogeographic structure and cryptic speciation in the trans-Antarctic moss Pyrrhobryum minioides. Evolution 57: 205-215.
30. Mayle FE. 2004. Assesment of the Neotropical dry forest refugia hypothesis in the light of paleoecological data and vegetation model simulations. Journal of Quaternary Science 19: 713-720.
31. Mendenhall M. 1994. Phylogeny of Baptisia and Thermopsis (Leguminosae) as inferred from chloroplast DNA and nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences, secondary chemistry, and morphology. PhD Thesis, University of Texas, Austin, TX.
32. Miranda F. 1947. Estudios sobre la vegetación de México - rasgos de la vegetación en la Cuenca del Río Balsas. Revista de la Sociedad Mexicana de Historia Natural, Tomo VIII, 1-4.
33. Ogden R, Thorpe RS. 2002. Molecular evidence for ecological speciation in tropical habitats. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 99: 13612-13615.
34. Okada M, Whitkins R, Lowrey TK. 1997. Genetics of adaptative radiation in Hawaiian and Cook Islands species of Tetramolopium (Asteraceae: Astereae). I. Nuclear RFLP marker diversity. American Journal of Botany 84: 1236-1246.
35. Orr M, Smith TB. 1998. Ecology and speciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: 502-506.
36. Pennington T, Prado DE, Pendry CA. 2000. Neotropical seasonally dry forests and the Quaternary vegetation changes. Journal of Biogeography 27: 261-273.
37. Pennington T, Lavin M, Prado DE, Pendry CA, Pell SK, Butterworth CA. 2004. Historical climate change and speciation: Neotropical seasonally dry forest plants show patterns of both Tertiary and Quaternary diversification. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 359: 515-537.
38. Petit RJ, Pineau ED, Demesure B, Bacilieri R, Ducousso A, Kremer A. 1997. Chloroplast DNA footprints of postglacial recolonization by oaks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 94: 9996-10001.
39. Posada D, Crandall KA. 2001. Intraspecific phylogenetics: trees grafting into networks. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16: 37-45.
40. Ramírez JL, Cevallos-Ferriz SR. 2000. Consideraciones sobre las angiospermas (plantas con flor) fósiles de México. GEOS Diciembre 433-444.
41. Riddle BR, Hafner DJ, Alexander LF, Jaeger JR. 2002. Cryptic vicariance in the historical assembly of Baja California Peninsular desert biota. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 97: 14438-14443.
42. Sáez A, Probert I, Geisen M, Quinn P, Young J, Medlin L. 2003. Pseudo-cryptic speciation in coccolithophores. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 12: 7163-7168.
43. Sewell MM, Parks CR, Chase MW. 1996. Intraspecific chloroplast DNA variation and biogeography of North American Liriodendron L. (Magnoliaceae). Evolution 50: 1147-1154.
44. Shaw AJ. 2001. Molecular phylogeography and cryptic speciation in bryophytes. Journal of Biogeography 28: 253-261.
45. Sheldon P. 1996. Plus ça change - a model for stasis and evolution in different environments. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology and Palaeoecology 127: 209-227.
46. Simmons MP, Ochoterena H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Systematic Biology 49: 369-381.
47. Simpson B, Latkin L, Weeks A. 2003. Progress towards resolving the relationships of the Caesalpinia group (Caesalpinieae: Caesalpinioideae: Leguminosae). In: Klitgaard B, Bruneau A, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Vol. 10. Higher Level Systematics. London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 123-148.
48. Sotuyo S, Lewis GP. 2007. A new species of Caesalpinia from the Rio Balsas Depression, Mexico and an updated taxonomic circumscription of the Caesalpinia hintonii complex (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae: Caesalpinieae: Poincianella Group). Brittonia 59: 33-36.
49. Sotuyo S, Contreras JL, Delgado-Salinas A, Oyama K. 2004. Genetic structure of the endemic Caesalpinia hintonii complex (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 247: 131-143.
50. Sousa MS, Delgado-Salinas A. 1993. Mexican Leguminosae: Phytogeography, endemism, and origins. In: Ramamoorthy AP, Bye R, Lot A, Fa J, eds. Biological diversity in Mexico: origins and distribution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 459-511.
51. Sousa MS, Soto JC. 1987. Nuevos taxa de Lonchocarpus (Leguminosae) de las cuencas baja y media del Río Balsas, México. Anales del Instituto de Biología, UNAM, serie Botánica 58: 69-86.
52. Swofford DL. 2001. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Ver. 4·0b8. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
53. Taberlet P, Gielly L, Pautou G, Bouvet J. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of the chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1105-1109.
54. Taberlet P, Fumagalli L, Wust-Saucy AG, Cosson JF. 1998. Comparative phylogeography and postglacial colonization routes in Europe. Molecular Ecology 7: 453-464.
55. Tremblay NO, Schoen DJ. 1999. Molecular phylogeography of Dryas integrifolia: glacial refugia and postglacial recolonization. Molecular Ecology 8: 1187-1198.
56. Tsitrone A, Kirkpatrick M, Levin DA. 2003. A model for chloroplast capture. Evolution 57: 1776-1782.
57. Vijverberg K, Kuperus P, Breeuwer JA, Bachmann K. 2000. Incipient radiation of New Zealand and Australian Microseris (Asteraceae): an amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) study. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13: 997-1007.
58. Wakeley J. 2000. The effects of subdivision on the genetic divergence of populations and species. Evolution 54: 1092-1101.
59. Weinberg JR, Starczak VR, Jora P. 1992. Evidence for rapid speciation following a founder event in the laboratory. Evolution 46: 1214-1220.