Profitability of fossil-fuel production under different instruments in international climate policies

Climate Policy

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 60-72

  Aune, Finn Roar ^a   Kverndokk, Snorre ^b   Lindholt, Lars ^a   Rosendahl, Knut Einar ^a  

^a STATISTICS NORWAY   (Norway)

^b RAGNAR FRISCH CENTRE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH   (Norway)

Author keywords

Climate policy; Energy markets; Technological change

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; ENERGY MARKET; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FOSSIL FUEL; INTERNATIONAL LAW; PROFITABILITY; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; SUBSIDY SYSTEM; TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE;

EID: 35348974466     PISSN: 14693062     EISSN: 17527457     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2007.9685638     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Aldy, J. E., Barrett, S., and Stavins, R. N., 2003. ‘Thirteen plus one:a comparison of global climate policy architectures’. Climate Policy, 3:373–397.
2. Arrow, K. J., 1962. ‘The economic implications of learning by doing’. Review of Economic Studies, 29:155–173.
3. Aune, F. R., Kverndokk, S., Lindholt, L., and Rosendahl, K. E., 2005. ‘Profitability of Different Instruments in International Climate Policies’, Discussion Paper No. 403 Statistics Norway
4. Barrett, S., 2003. Environment and Statecraft Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
5. 2 taxation and petroleum wealth’. Energy Journal, 18 (4):33–71.
6. Berg, E., Kverndokk, S., and Rosendahl, K. E., 2002. ‘Oil exploration under climate treaties’. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44:493–516.
7. 2 abatement in the presence of induced technological change’. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39:1–38.
8. Grübler, A., and Messner, S., 1998. ‘Technological change and the timing of mitigation measures’. Energy Economics, 20:495–512.
9. Holtsmark, B., 2003. ‘Strategic behaviour in the market for permits under the Kyoto Protocol’. Climate Policy, 3 (4):399–415.
10. IEA. 2003. Renewables for Power Generation:Status & Prospects, OECD/IEA
11. IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]. 2000. Special Report on Emission Scenarios (SRES) Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
12. Jaffe, A. B., Newell, R. G., and Stavins, R. N., 2002. ‘Environmental policy and technological change’. Environmental and Resource Economics, 22:41–69.
13. Johansen, L., 1965. Public Economics Amsterdam:North-Holland.
14. 2 concentrations:mitigation scenarios using the Petro model’. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 3 (2):195–224.
15. Kverndokk, S., Rosendahl, K. E., and Rutherford, T. F., 2004. Climate Policies and Induced Technological Change:Impacts and Timing of Technology Subsidies, Memorandum No. 05/2004 University of Oslo:Department of Economics.
16. Rosendahl, K. E., 2004. ‘Cost-effective environmental policy:implications of induced technological change’. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 48:1099–1121.
17. Tirole, J., 1988. The Theory of Industrial Organization Cambridge, MA, USA:TheMIT Press.
18. 2 concentrations’. Nature, 379:240–243.