Stabilization of CO2 concentrations: mitigation scenarios using the Petro model

Environmental Economics and Policy Studies

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 195-224

  Kverndokk, Snorre ^a   Lindholt, Lars ^b   Rosendahl, Knut Einar ^b  

^a RAGNAR FRISCH CENTRE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH   (Norway)

^b STATISTICS NORWAY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Carbon leakage; Carbon taxes; CO2 concentration; Exhaustible resources; Petroleum wealth

Indexed keywords

EID: 1642269611     PISSN: 1432847X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03354037     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. 2 emissions reductions: the debate revisited. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 10(3/4):508–521
2. 2. Science, 276:1818–1819, 20 June
3. 2 taxation and oil wealth. The Energy Journal, 18(4):33–71
4. Berg E, Kverndokk S, Rosendahl KE (1997b) Gains from cartelisation in the oil market. Energy Policy, 25(13):1075–1091
5. Berg E, Kverndokk S, Rosendahl KE (1999) Optimal oil exploration under climate treaties. Discussion Papers 245, Statistics Norway
6. Bernstein P, Montgomery D, Rutherford T (1999) Global impacts of the Kyoto agreement: results from the MS-MRT model. Resource and Energy Economics, 21:375–413
7. BP (1995) Statistical Review of World Energy. June
8. 2 emissions: evidence from six global models. Working Paper No. 122, Economics Department, OECD, Paris
9. 2 reduction agreement. Resource and Energy Economics, 18:83–102
10. 2 reductions and carbon leakage: the consequences of international trade in basic materials. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 25:162–176
11. Heal G (1976) The relationship between price and extraction cost for a resource with a backstop technology. The Bell Journal of Economics, 7(2):371–378
12. IPCC (1992) Climate Change 1992: The supplementary report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
13. IPCC (1995) Climate change 1994, Radiative forcing of climate. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
14. Joos et al. (1996) An efficient and accurate representation of complex oceanic and biospheric models of anthropogenic carbon uptake. Tellus, 48B:389–417
15. 2 permit prices and the market for fossil fuels. Discussion Papers 258, Statistics Norway
16. McKibbin W, Ross M, Shackleton R, Wilcoxen P (1999) Emissions trading, capital flows and the Kyoto Protocol. In Weyant (ed) (1999):287–333
17. IPCC (2000) Special report on emission scenarios. Cambridge, London (to be published)
18. Salant S (1976) Exhaustible resources and industrial structure: a Nash-Cournot approach to the world oil market. Journal of Political Economy, 84(5):1079–1093
19. Smith C (1998) Carbon leakage: an empirical assessment using a global econometric model. In Barker T, Kohler, J (eds) International competitiveness and environmental policies, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK
20. Tulpulé V, Brown S, Lim J, Polidano C, Pant H, Fischer B (1999) The Kyoto Protocol: an economic analysis using GTEM. In Weyant (ed) (1999):257–285
21. United Nations (1992) UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. United Nations, Climate Change Secretariat, Geneva
22. Weyant J (ed) (1999) The costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A multi-model evaluation. Special Issue of The Energy Journal, 1999
23. 2 concentrations. Nature, 379:240–243, 18 January