Heritability of acoustic signalling time in the Texas field cricket, Gryllus texensis

Evolutionary Ecology Research

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 975-986

  Bertram, Susan M ^a,b   Kemp, Darrell J ^a,c   Johnson, Jennifer S ^a   Orozco, S Xochitl ^a   Gorelick, Root ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Calling time; Dominance; Environmental variance; Gryllidae; Heritability; Maternal effects; Texas field cricket

Indexed keywords

GRYLLIDAE; GRYLLINAE; GRYLLUS TEXENSIS; ORTHOPTERA;

EID: 35348967944     PISSN: 15220613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ali, A. and Johnson, D.L. 2000. Heritability estimates for winter hardiness in lentil under natural and controlled conditions. Plant Breed., 119: 283-285.
2. Avery, D.E. 2005. Induction of embryonic dormancy in the calanoid copepod Acartia hudsonica: heritability and phenotypic plasticity in two geographically separated populations. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 314: 215-225.
3. Bertram, S.M. 2002. Temporally fluctuating selection of sex-limited signaling traits in the Texas field cricket, Gryllus texensis. Evolution, 56: 1831-1839.
4. Bertram, S.M. and Johnson, L. 1998. An electronic technique for monitoring the temporal aspects of acoustic signals of captive organisms. Bioacoustics, 9: 107-118.
5. Bertram, S.M., Johnson, L., Clark, J. and Chief, C. 2004. An electronic acoustic recorder (EAR) for quantifying when, how much, and how loud individuals signal acoustically. Tech. Acoustics, 20: 1-10.
6. Cade, W.H. 1975. Acoustically orienting parasitoids - fly phonotaxis to cricket song. Science, 190: 1312-1313.
7. Cade, W.H. 1981. Alternative male strategies: genetic differences in crickets. Science, 212: 563-565.
8. Cade, W.H. 1991. Inter- and intraspecific variation in nightly calling duration in field crickets, Gryllus integer and G. rubens (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). J. Insect Behav., 4: 185-194.
9. Cade, W.H. and Cade, E.S. 1992. Male mating success, calling and searching behavior at high and low densities in the field cricket, Gryllus integer. Anim. Behav., 43: 49-56.
10. Crnokrak, P. and Roff, D.A. 1995. Fitness differences associated with calling behaviour in the two wing morphs of male sand crickets, Gryllus firmus. Anim. Behav., 50: 1475-1481.
11. Falconer, D.S. and Mackay, T.F.C. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Harlow, UK: Prentice-Hall.
12. Fisher, R.A. 1958. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. New York: Dover.
13. Gilmour, A.R., Gogel, B.J., Cullis, B.R., Welham, S.J. and Thompson, R. 2002. ASReml User Guide. Hemel Hempstead, UK: VSN International.
14. Gorelick, R. 2005. Environmentally alterable additive genetic effects. Evol. Ecol. Res., 77: 371-379.
15. Gray, D.A. and Cade, W.H. 1999. Quantitative genetics of sexual selection in the field cricket, Gryllus integer. Evolution, 53: 848-854.
16. Gray, D.A. and Cade, W.H. 2000. Sexual selection and speciation in field crickets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97: 14449-14454.
17. Hedrick, A. 1988. Female choice and the heritability of attractive male traits: an empirical study. Am. Nat., 132: 267-276.
18. Hedrick, A.V. 2005. Environmental condition-dependent effects on a heritable, preferred male trait. Anim. Behav., 70: 1121-1124.
19. Holzer, B., Jacot, A. and Brinkhof, M.W.G. 2003. Condition-dependent signaling affects male sexual attractiveness in field crickets, Gryllus campestris. Behav. Ecol., 14: 353-359.
20. Knott, S.A., Sibly, R.M., Smith, R.H. and Møller, H. 1995. Maximum likelihood estimation of genetic parameters in life history studies using the 'animal model'. Funct. Ecol., 9: 122-126.
21. Lynch, M. and Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
22. Mallard, S. and Barnard, C. 2004. Food stress, fluctuating asymmetry and reproductive performance in the Gryllid crickets Gryllus bimaculatus and Grylloides sigillatus. Behaviour, 141: 219-232.
23. Mather, K. and Jinks, J.L. 1977. Introduction to Biometrical Genetics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
24. Moore, A.J., Wolf, J.B. and Brodie, E.D. 1997. Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process: I. Direct and indirect effects of social interactions. Evolution, 51: 1352-1362.
25. Mousseau, T.A. and Dingle, H. 1991. Maternal effects in insect life histories. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 37: 511-534.
26. Mousseau, T.A. and Fox, C.W. 1998. Maternal Effects as Adaptations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Otte, D. and Cade, W.H. 2000. Gryllus texensis n. sp.: A widely studied field cricket (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) from the southern United States. Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc., 126: 117-123.
28. Qvarnström, A. and Price, T.D. 2001. Maternal effects, paternal effects and sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol., 16: 95-100.
29. Roff, D.A. 1997. Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics. New York: Chapman & Hall.
30. Roff, D.A. 2001. The threshold model as a general purpose normalizing transformation. Heredity, 86: 404-411.
31. Roff, D.A. and Sokolovska, N. 2004. Extra-nuclear effects on growth and development in the sand cricket Gryllus firmus. J. Evol. Biol., 17: 663-671.
32. Scheuber, H., Jacot, A. and Brinkhof, M.W.G. 2003. Condition dependence of a multicomponent sexual signal in the field cricket, Gryllus campestris. Anim. Behav., 65: 721-727.
33. Stearns, S.C. 1984. Heritability estimates for age and length at maturity in two populations of mosquitofish that shared ancestors in 1905. Evolution, 38: 368-375.
34. Wagner, W.E. and Hoback, W.W. 1999. Nutritional effects on male calling behaviour in the variable field cricket. Anim. Behav., 57: 89-95.
35. Wagner, W.E., Murray, A.M. and Cade, W.H. 1995. Phenotypic variation in the mating preferences of female field crickets, Gryllus integer. Anim. Behav., 49: 1269-1281.
36. Weigensberg, I., Carriere, Y. and Roff, D.A. 1998. Effects of male genetic contribution and paternal investment to egg and hatchling size in the cricket, Gryllus firmus. J. Evol. Biol., 11: 135-146.