Sixty-four-slice CT in the assessment of global and regional left ventricular function: Comparison with MRI in a porcine model of acute and subacute myocardial infarction

European Radiology

Volumn 17, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 2948-2956

  Brodoefel, H ^a   Reimann, A ^a   Klumpp, B ^a   Fenchel, M ^a   Heuschmid, M ^a   Burgstahler, C ^a   Schroeder, S ^a   Miller, S ^a   Claussen, C D ^a   Scheule, A M ^b   Kopp, A F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b Cardiac and Vascular Surgery ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

64 slice CT; Animal model; LV function; MR imaging; Myocardial infarction

Indexed keywords

IMERON 400; IOMEPROL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CINERADIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FOLLOW UP; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE WALL MOTION; HEART MUSCLE REPERFUSION; HEART STROKE VOLUME; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KAPPA STATISTICS; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SWINE;

ACUTE DISEASE; ANIMALS; DIASTOLE; HEART; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; MYOCARDIUM; SWINE; SYSTOLE; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 35348948634     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0673-3     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Emond M, Mock MB, Davis KB et al (1994) Long-term survival of medically treated patients in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry. Circulation 90:2645-2657
2. Moise A, Bourassa MG, Theroux P et al (1985) Prognostic significance of progression of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 55:941-946
3. Kuettner A, Beck T, Drosch T et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary imaging using 16-detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:123-127
4. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al (2005) Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: First experience. Eur Heart J 26:1482-1487
5. Grude M, Juergens KU, Wichter T et al (2003) Evaluation of global left ventricular myocardial function with electrocardiogram-gated multidetector computed tomography: Comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 38:653-661
6. Heuschmid M, Rothfuss JK, Schroeder S et al (2006) Assessment of left ventricular myocardial function using 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography: Comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography. Eur Radiol 16:551-559
7. Juergens KU, Seifarth H, Maintz D et al (2006) MDCT determination of volume and function of the left ventricle: Are short-axis image reformations necessary? AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:S371-S378
8. Koch K, Oellig F, Kunz P et al (2004) Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function with a 16-slice spiral-CT using two different software tools for quantitative functional analysis and qualitative evaluation of wall motion changes in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Rofo 176:1786-1793
9. Mahnken AH, Katoh M, Bruners P et al (2005) Acute myocardial infarction: assessment of left ventricular function with 16-detector row spiral CT versus MR imaging-study in pigs. Radiology 236:112-117
10. Raman SV, Shah M, McCarthy B, Garcia A, Ferketich AK (2006) Multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance. Am Heart J 151:736-744
11. Schlosser T, Pagonidis K, Herborn CU et al (2005) Assessment of left ventricular parameters using 16-MDCT and new software for endocardial and epicardial border delineation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:765-773
12. Yamamuro M, Tadamura E, Kubo S et al (2005) Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm: comparison with echocardiography, SPECT, and MR imaging. Radiology 234:381-390
13. Ehara M, Surmely JF, Kawai M et al (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: Comparison with conventional invasive angiography. Circ J 70:564-571
14. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F et al (2005) Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: A comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:147-154
15. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA et al (2005) High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112:2318-2323
16. Nikolaou K, Knez A, Rist C et al (2006) Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:111-117
17. Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G et al (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 16:575-582
18. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:552-557
19. Thompson BH, Stanford W (1994) Evaluation of cardiac function with ultrafast computed tomography. Radiol Clin North Am 32:537-551
20. Sievers B, Kirchberg S, Bakan A, Franken U, Trappe HJ (2004) Impact of papillary muscles in ventricular volume and ejection fraction assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 6:9-16
21. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V et al (2002) Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105:539-542
22. Miller S, Simonetti OP, Carr J, Kramer U, Finn JP (2002) MR Imaging of the heart with cine true fast imaging with steady-state precession: influence of spatial and temporal resolutions on left ventricular functional parameters. Radiology 223:263-269
23. Setser RM, Fischer SE, Lorenz CH (2000) Quantification of left ventricular function with magnetic resonance images acquired in real time. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:430-438
24. Weissler AM, Harris WS, Schoenfeld CD (1968) Systolic time intervals in heart failure in man. Circulation 37:149-159
25. Juergens KU, Grude M, Fallenberg EM et al (2002) Using ECG-gated multidetector CT to evaluate global left ventricular myocardial function in patients with coronary artery disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1545-1550
26. Juergens KU, Grude M, Maintz D et al (2004) Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: Initial experience. Radiology 230:403-410
27. Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M et al (2005) Sixteen-slice spiral CT versus MR imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction. Eur Radiol 15:714-720
28. Marban E (1991) Myocardial stunning and hibernation. The physiology behind the colloquialisms. Circulation 83:681-688
29. Henneman MM, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW et al (2006) Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function and volumes with 64-slice MSCT: A comparison with 2D echocardiography. J Nucl Cardiol 13:480-487
30. Schepis T, Gaemperli O, Koepfli P et al (2006) Comparison of 64-slice CT with gated SPECT for evaluation of left ventricular function. J Nucl Med 47:1288-1294
31. Trabold T, Buchgeister M, Kuttner A et al (2003) Estimation of radiation exposure in 16-detector row computed tomography of the heart with retrospective ECG-gating. Rofo 175:1051-1055