Improving teacher quality: Ideological perspectives and policy prescriptions

Educational Forum

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 14-25

  Lasley, Thomas J ^a   Bainbridge, William L ^a   Berry, Barnett ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35348912593     PISSN: 00131725     EISSN: 19388098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00131720208984530     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Apple, M. VV. 2001. Markets, standards, teaching, and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education 52(3): 182-96.
2. Archer, J. 2002. Research: Focusing in on teachers. Education Week 21 (29): 36-39.
3. Ballou, D. 2002. Sizing up test scores. Education Next 2(2): 10-15.
4. Berliner, D. C. 2000. A personal response to those who bash teacher education, journal of Teacher Education 51(5); 358-71.
5. Bransford, J. D., A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking, eds. 1999. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
6. Bush, G. W. 2001. No child left behind. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education. Available at: http://www. ed.gov/offices/O E S E/esea/nclb/t i 11 epag e.htrnl.
7. Collins, J. 2001. Good to great: Why some companies make the leap-and others don't. New York: HarperBusiness.
8. Consortium for the Application of Technology and Learning Innovations in Schools of Education. 2001. The commercialization of teacher preparation: For profit providers in teacher education. Available at: http://www.catalise.org.
9. Darling-Hammond, L. 1997. Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. Kutztown, Pa.: National Commission on Teaching & America’s Future. ERIC ED 415 183.
10. Darling-Hammond, L., B. Berry, and A. Thoreson. 2001. Does teacher licensure matter? Evaluating the evidence. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 23(1): 57-77.
11. Diez, M. E. 2002. The certification connection. Education Next 2(1): 8-15.
12. Etzioni, A., ed. 1969. The semi-professions and their organization: Teachers, nurses, social workers. New York: Free Press.
13. Fraser, J. W. 2002. A tenuous hold. Education Next 2(1): 16-21.
14. Gitomer, D., and A. S. Latham, and R. Ziomek. 1999. The academic quality of prospective teachers: The impact of admissions and licensure testing. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service.
15. Goldhaber, D. D., and D. J. Brewer. 1999. Teacher licensing and student achievement. In Better teachers, better schools, ed. M. Kanstoroom and C. E. Finn Jr., 83-102. Washington, D.C.: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
16. Haycock, K. 2001. Teachers matter hugely. Paper presented to the Governor’s Commission on Teaching Success, 16 November, Columbus, Ohio.
17. Hess, F. M. 2002. Break the link. Education Next 2(1): 22-28.
18. Holmes Group. 1986. Tomorrow’s teachers. East Lansing, Mich.: HG. ERIC ED 270 454.
19. Hoxby, C. M. 2001. Changing the profession. Education Next 1(1): 57-64.
20. Ingersoll, R. M. 2002. Holes in the teacher supply bucket. The School Admiliistrator 53(3): 42-43.
21. Jerald, C. D., and R. M. Lngersoll. 2002. All talk, no action: Putting an end to out-of-field teaching. Washington, D.C.: The Education Trust.
22. Kanstoroom, M., and C. E. Finn Jr. 1999. Better teachers, better schools. Washington, D.C.: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
23. National Caucus of Black State Legislators. 2001. Closing the achievement gap. Washington, DC: NCBSL.
24. National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. 1996. What matters most: Teaching for America’s future. New York: NCTAF.
25. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. 2000. National reading panel: Teaching children to read. Washington, D.C.: NICHD.
26. Oakes, J., M. L. Franke, K. H. Quartz, and J. Rogers. 2002. Research for high quality teaching: Defining it, developing it, assessing it. journal of Teacher Education 53(3): 228-34.
27. Sanders, W. 2002. Personal communication.
28. Tell, C. 2001. Making room for alternative routes. Educational Leadership 58(8): 38-41.
29. U.S. Department of Education. 2002. Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: The Secretary’s annual report on teacher quality. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, Office of Policy Planning and Innovation.
30. Wenglinsky, H. 2002. Testing the teachers: Different settings, different results. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service.
31. Wilson, S. M., R. E. Floden, and J. Ferrini-Mundy. 2001. Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps and recommendations. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
32. Wise, A. E., and J. A. Leibbrand. 2000. Standards and teacher quality: Entering the new millennium. Phi Delta Kappan 81(3): 612-16, 621.